ABSTRACT
AIM: To determine whether PET/CT and brain MRI used in staging NSCLC can be accurate, reliable and cost-effective tools. NSCLC represents 80-85% of lung cancer and adequate information on the initial tumor staging is critical for planning an optimal therapeutic strategy. PATIENTS & METHODS: Data from 30 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients in Greece were collected and prospectively recorded. Patients with potential resectable disease were evaluated to ensure that there are no detectable metastases that would rule out the possibility of a curative surgery. RESULTS: Divergence occurred in 50% of cases of staging with CT or PET/CT alone, while metastases undetectable by the CT were revealed using PET/CT. Unnecessary thoracotomies were avoided by 10% of patients and another 10% was operated on after chemotherapy with a better prognosis. CONCLUSION: PET/CT and brain MRI combined are reliable for correct staging, reducing avoidable thoracotomies, morbidity rates and costs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity associated with adjuvant administration of carboplatin and pemetrexed for completely resected patients with stage IB, II and IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five eligible NSCLC patients received surgical resection for pathological stage IB, II or IIIA followed by postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin AUC5 and pemetrexed administered on days 1 and 14 on a 28-day cycle. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CF) was given prophylactically. RESULTS: The mean time to disease progression of patients was 26 months. Toxicities were generally mild to moderate and entirely manageable. CONCLUSION: The administration of carboplatin and pemetrexed is a safe, well-tolerated and convenient regimen in the adjuvant setting of completely resected NSCLC, with efficacy similar to that reported in other regimens but less toxicity.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carboplatin/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Glutamates/administration & dosage , Glutamates/adverse effects , Guanine/administration & dosage , Guanine/adverse effects , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , PemetrexedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We recorded the epidemiologic and clinical features of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in order to provide information on the management of these patients. We also developed a desensitization protocol and evaluated its clinical application. For these reasons, we analyzed retrospectively the records of 215 CRC patients treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens either as an adjuvant, first-line, second-line, or more. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 52 patients with HSRs were analyzed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), v3.0. Three patients were chosen for the desensitization protocol. After determining the starting point for desensitization, we applied the standard protocol for parenteral desensitization to b-lactam antibiotics. Oxaliplatin treatment was then carried out with serial 10-fold dilutions in sufficient volume to administer the total dose. A total of 52 patients (24.2%) were recorded as having an allergic reaction to oxaliplatin. RESULTS: Hypersensitivity reactions were recorded after a mean of 6.5 (SD +/- 4.5) cycles. Only 4 patients (4 of 215; 1.8%) developed CTCAE grade 3/4 HSRs. Hypersensitivity reactions were seen more likely in patients receiving second-line or more of chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy-naive patients. No other correlations were seen (the presence of atopic disease, positive skin prick test). The 3 patients, having completed the parenteral desensitization protocol, completed their treatment uneventfully as well. CONCLUSION: Hypersensitivity reactions from oxaliplatin respond quickly to the discontinuation of the drug and appropriate support. Premedication and an increased infusion time could allow for readministration. The desensitization protocol we developed can provide a reliable alternative to permanent discontinuation of oxaliplatin.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Female , Greece/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxaliplatin , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Background: We recorded the epidemiologic and clinical features of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in order to provide information on the management of these patients. We also developed a desensitization protocol and evaluated its clinical application. For these reasons, we analyzed retrospectively the records of 215 CRC patients treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens either as an adjuvant, first-line, second-line, or more. Patients and Methods: Data from 52 patients with HSRs were analyzed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), v3.0. Three patients were chosen for the desensitization protocol. After determining the starting point for desensitization, we applied the standard protocol for parenteral desensitization to b-lactam antibiotics. Oxaliplatin treatment was then carried out with serial 10-fold dilutions in sufficient volume to administer the total dose. A total of 52 patients (24.2%) were recorded as having an allergic reaction to oxaliplatin. Results: Hypersensitivity reactions were recorded after a mean of 6.5 (SD +/- 4.5) cycles. Only 4 patients (4 of 215; 1.8%) developed CTCAE grade 3/4 HSRs. Hypersensitivity reactions were seen more likely in patients receiving second-line or more of chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy-naive patients. No other correlations were seen (the presence of atopic disease, positive skin prick test). The 3 patients, having completed the parenteral desensitization protocol, completed their treatment uneventfully as well. Conclusion: Hypersensitivity reactions from oxaliplatin respond quickly to the discontinuation of the drug and appropriate support. Premedication and an increased infusion time could allow for readministration. The desensitization protocol we developed can provide a reliable alternative to permanent discontinuation of oxaliplatin.
