Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 65(1): 23-31, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38231041

ABSTRACT

Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy in various technical combinations have been the main driver of acute deep venous interventions for over a decade. While the majority of high-level evidence was based on it, CDT requires longer procedural care and is associated to a small but not negligible bleeding risk. Contemporary DVT intervention, following the paradigm shift in myocardial infarction and stroke management, has steadily migrated towards minimizing or eliminating thrombolytics due to the introduction of mechanical/aspiration thrombectomy. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) devices are undoubtedly improving our ability to remove thrombus more efficiently in a single session without the adverse events and complex logistics related to the use of thrombolytics.


Subject(s)
Thrombolytic Therapy , Venous Thrombosis , Humans , Thrombolytic Therapy/adverse effects , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Venous Thrombosis/therapy , Thrombectomy/adverse effects , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
Curr Pharm Des ; 28(10): 771-777, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35440299

ABSTRACT

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication after major orthopaedic operations, such as a total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. Therefore, perioperative VTE prophylaxis is recommended; a multitude of modern options are available, including both pharmacologic (aspirin, unfractionated and lowmolecular- weight heparin, vitamin K antagonists, and novel oral anticoagulants) and/or mechanical interventions (early mobilization, graduated compression stockings, intermittent pneumatic compression devices, and venous foot pumps). However, because of the abundance of these possibilities, it is crucial to understand the benefits and drawbacks of each VTE prophylaxis option to ensure that the optimal treatment plan is developed for each patient. The American College of Chest Physicians (AACP) and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) have both published individual guidelines on VTE prophylaxis regimens, alongside numerous studies evaluating the efficacy and outcomes of the different prophylaxis modalities. The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of the evidence on VTE prophylaxis after elective total hip and knee arthroplasty based on current guidelines and highlight the major concerns and potential complications.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Venous Thromboembolism , Venous Thrombosis , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Humans , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , United States , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control
3.
J Vasc Surg ; 74(5): 1752-1762.e1, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33617979

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to systematically review results of endovascular aneurysm repair for isolated common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAA) regarding outcomes and to determine if changes should be made to current diameter threshold recommendations for intervention. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central databases were searched. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were deemed eligible and provided data for 879 patients and 981 isolated CIAA treated with endovascular repair. The majority of the patients (90.8%) were males. The weighted mean age of the patients was 71.7 years (range, 37-91 years). The weighted mean diameter for the CIAA was 41. mm 1 (range, 15-110 mm) and for ruptured aneurysms 58.4 mm. The overall technical success rate was 97.6%. The perioperative mortality rate was 0.7%. Secondary patency rates were reported in only four studies and varied between 96.7% and 100%. The overall morbidity rate was 14%, ranging from 0% to 25%. Most of the studies did not report long-term or adequate follow-up data. Rupture of an isolated CIAA at <4 cm diameter was extremely low. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of isolated CIAA is feasible and safe with a low mortality and excellent technical success rates. Consideration of increasing the diameter threshold for intervention of CIAA to 4 cm should be considered. Studies with longer follow-up and reliable long-term results are needed.


Subject(s)
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Iliac Aneurysm/surgery , Iliac Artery/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Clinical Decision-Making , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Iliac Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Aneurysm/mortality , Iliac Artery/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 75: 406-419, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33549794

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim in this study was to systematically review the literature to identify the time of occurrence of a newly diagnosed Type II endoleak (T2E) following an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and its potential impact on aneurysmal sac diameter changes. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane until January 2020. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of a random effects model. The I-square statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity. RESULTS: Thirty-three observational studies were deemed eligible and provided data for 2643 T2E detected following EVAR. A total of 1432 (54.2%) T2E were diagnosed before 30 days follow-up, while 1035 (39.1%) T2E were diagnosed beyond 30 days following EVAR. A total of 222 (8.4%) T2E were diagnosed after 12 months of follow-up. A pooled meta-analysis of 6 studies, showed that early diagnosed T2E had a statistically significant higher odds of resolving as compared to those detected late (OR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.14-5.09; P = 0.021; I2 = 68.9%). Sac expansion was documented in 313 (29%) T2E. The ruptured endoleaks were 14 (1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of a T2E is a dynamic process detected throughout the lifetime of a patient with 8% detected beyond 12 months following EVAR. Long-term follow up is required with future prospective studies with consist reporting on changes in sac diameter, the thrombus characteristics. Long-term outcomes are needed to optimize management of patients with a newly diagnosed T2E.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Endoleak/epidemiology , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Endoleak/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Observational Studies as Topic , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...