[Cutaneous drug reactions]. / Toxidermies.

Cutaneous drug reactions are a common reason for calls and visits. This term chiefly refers to hypersensitivity reactions ranging from benign rash without contraindication of treatment to severe life-threatening clinical pictures, such as anaphylactic shock and epidermal necrolysis. They should be carefully managed from the outset. Indeed, history taking and precise semiological description of the lesions are crucial to the formulation of recommendations for the patient. Allergological investigation of such reactions has developed greatly in recent decades and must now be carried out much more extensively. The arrival of new drug families such as biotherapies and the development of drug habituation protocols constitute the challenges of tomorrow for cutaneous drug reactions.

[Hydrochlorothiazide use and risk of skin cancers: A systematic review]. / Risque de cancers cutanés sous hydrochlorothiazide : revue systématique.

The risk of skin cancer induced by photosensiting drugs is well known. An association between hydrochlorothiazide use and skin cancer has been recently published in some epidemiological studies. A systematic review of case-control or prospectives cohorts showed an increased risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma even if some confusing factors such as tobacco smoking was not analysed. Results are more conflicting for basal cell carcinoma or melanoma. These results do not modify the benefit/risk ratio but should lead to propose preventive mesures: identification of high risk population, avoidance of this drug if possible in immunocompromised patients or with previous skin cancer, regular skin examination in case of long term use of hydrochlorothiazide.

Field-testing the new anaphylaxis' classification for the WHO International Classification of Diseases-11 revision.

BACKGROUND: To consolidate the new classification model addressed to the allergic and hypersensitivity conditions according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 revision timeline, we here propose real-life application of quality assurance methodology to evaluate sensitivity and accuracy of the 'Anaphylaxis' subsection. METHODS: We applied field-testing methodology by analysing all the consecutive inpatients' files documented as allergies from the University Hospital of Montpellier electronic database for the period of 1 year. The files clinically validated as being anaphylaxis were manually blind-coded under ICD-10 and current ICD-11 beta draft. The correspondence of coding and the impressions regarding sensibility were evaluated. RESULTS: From all 2318 files related to allergic or hypersensitivity conditions, 673 had some of the anaphylaxis ICD-10 codes; 309 files (46%) from 209 patients had anaphylaxis and allergic or hypersensitivity comorbidities description. The correspondence between the two coders was perfect for 162 codes from all 309 entities (52.4%) (Cohen-kappa value 0.63) with the ICD-10 and for 221 codes (71.5%) (Cohen-kappa value 0.77) with the ICD-11. There was a high agreement regarding sensibility of the ICD-11 usability (Cohen-kappa value 0.75). CONCLUSION: We here propose the first attempt of real-life application to validate the new ICD-11 'Anaphylaxis' subsection. Clearer was the improvement in accuracy reaching 71.5% of agreement when ICD-11 was used. By allowing all the relevant diagnostic terms for anaphylaxis to be included into the ICD-11 framework, WHO has recognized their importance not only to clinicians but also to epidemiologists, statisticians, healthcare planners and other stakeholders.

[Recommendations for patients on preparing for dermatology-allergology consultations: Evaluation of the information notice of the French Society for Dermatology]. / Recommandations au patient avant les tests cutanés : évaluation de la fiche d'information du groupe dermato-allergologie de la Société française de dermatologie.

BACKGROUND: Skin patch-tests in dermatology-allergology practice require good preparation. To this end, the dermatology-allergology group of the French Society of Dermatology introduced an information notice informing patients about patch testing procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility and understanding of the notice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The information notice was sent out to patients before testing. On the day of the test, a questionnaire was submitted to patients to evaluate their comprehension of the notice. Another questionnaire was submitted simultaneously to the dermatology-allergology practitioner to evaluate whether the patient had complied with the guidelines given in the information notice. Paired questionnaires were analyzed for this study. RESULTS: Eight dermatology-allergology hospital departments participated in the study and collected 921 paired questionnaires over a period of 18months. Among the vast majority (96.2%) of patients who had read the information notice, most found it useful (98.8%), easy to read (97.4%), and appropriate (91.5%). Ten percent of patients had difficulty understanding. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the information notice was clear and explicit for the immense majority of patients. Thanks to the feedback of a number of patients, the information notice was further improved to enhance patient understanding.

Occupational contact urticaria: lessons from the French National Network for Occupational Disease Vigilance and Prevention (RNV3P).

BACKGROUND: Occupational contact urticaria (OCU) is an occupational contact dermatitis that can cause serious health consequences and disability at work. OBJECTIVES: To describe OCU and its temporal trends by the main causal agents and activity sectors in a nationwide scheme in France. METHODS: Using data from the French National Network for Occupational Disease Vigilance and Prevention (RNV3P), we described OCU reported during the period 2001-10 and analysed the temporal trends of OCU and OCU attributed to the most frequent agents over the study period. Trends analyses were supported by reporting odds ratios using a logistic regression model with reference to 2001, or with time as a continuous variable. RESULTS: During the study period, 251 cases of OCU were reported in RNV3P, half of which were due to natural rubber latex, in particular in the health and social work activity sector (HSW). The number of these cases declined significantly over the study period (19% per year), and particularly after 2006. Conversely, the other causes of OCU did not decrease. CONCLUSIONS: Using surveillance data from a French national network, this study has found that there was a significant decline in OCU due to natural rubber latex, particularly in the HSW, when powdered latex gloves were banned from French hospitals. Our results show the effectiveness of this preventive measure, and suggest that this practice should be extended to other sectors.

Occupational allergic contact dermatitis and major allergens in France: temporal trends for the period 2001-2010.

BACKGROUND: Occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD) is one of the most common occupational skin diseases in developed countries, but data about its temporal trends in incidence remain sparse. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe OACD trends in terms of industrial activities and main causal agents in France over the period 2001-2010. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from the French National Network of Occupational Disease Vigilance and Prevention (RNV3P, Réseau National de Vigilance et de Prévention des Pathologies Professionnelles). All OACD considered probably or certainly associated with an occupational exposure were included in the study. Trends were examined (i) on annual crude numbers of OACD and (ii) on reported odds ratios of OACD calculated using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 3738 cases of OACD were reported and the mean age of OACD cases was 35 years, 52% being women. The most frequent occupations were hairdressers, health care workers, cleaning staff and masons. The total number of OACD cases remained stable over the study period, but increases in OACD related to isothiazolinones (P = 0·002), epoxy resins (P = 0·012) and fragrances (P = 0·005) were observed. Conversely, decreases were noted for cement compounds (P = 0·002) and plant products (P = 0·031). These trends highlight specific sectors and exposures at risk of OACD. CONCLUSIONS: Trends in OACD depend on the nature of exposure. Observed decreases were consistent with prevention measures taken during the study period, and the increases observed serve to highlight those areas where preventative efforts need to be made to reduce skin allergies in the workplace.

Cutaneous adverse drug reaction to oral acetazolamide and skin tests.

BACKGROUND: Few cases of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADR) to oral acetazolamide, a non-antimicrobial sulfonamide, have been previously reported, and the interest of acetazolamide skin tests has never been studied. OBJECTIVES: We report a series of ten patients with oral acetazolamide CADR and skin tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The files of ten patients with CADR secondary to oral acetazolamide prescribed for cataract surgery in most cases referred between 2001 and 2011 in four French dermatology and allergy departments were retrospectively reviewed. Skin tests with acetazolamide were performed in nine patients and twelve controls. Other sulfonamides were tested in five of ten patients. RESULTS: Seven patients developed maculopapular exanthema and four had acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Patch tests were positive for 8/9 patients, prick tests for 2/4 and intradermal tests for 3/3. Patch and prick or intradermal test results were concordant in 2/3 positive subjects. Patch tests for other sulfonamides were negative, as were patch tests in controls. CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest series of CADR to oral acetazolamide (maculopapular exanthema or acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis). A drug eruption after cataract surgery should be investigated for accountability of acetazolamide. In view of this retrospective study, skin tests and particularly intradermal tests appear to be an important contribution to demonstrate accountability.

[Methodology for rapid readout tests]. / Méthodologie des tests à lecture immédiate.

This article discusses the methodology of rapid readout tests, in particular skin-prick tests, open tests and epidermal tests with readouts at 30 minutes and intradermal tests. These tests are used for a large number of allergens: seasonal environmental airborne allergens, dust mites, household insects, animal allergens, moulds, food allergens, formed agents, occupational allergens, drug allergens, etc. We discuss the risk of cross allergies between allergens. Finally, the skin-prick test is the preferred first-line test because of its ease of use and safety.

[The prospective multicenter study on standard photopatch tests by the French Society of Photodermatology from 1991-2001]. / Etude prospective multicentrique 1991-2001 de la batterie standard des photopatch-tests de la Société Française de Photodermatologie.

INTRODUCTION: To develop a standard panel of photopatch tests, the French Society of Photodermatology conducted a prospective study from 1991 to 2001 on the frequency of photoallergens encountered in France and on the relevance of the choice of the various photoallergens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen photobiology centers participated in the study from 1991 to 1995, and ten centers from 1995 to 2001. A set of 3 samples of photopatch tests was applied on any patient suspected of photoallergy. On Day 2, two sets were irradiated with ultraviolet A (UVA) and total spectrum (DEM 0.75); with the third set being used as control. Readings were made on D3 and D4. RESULTS: Two thousand sixty-seven patients were tested. Eight hundred fifty-six, i.e., 41% exhibited one or several positive tests. In the majority of cases it was a photoallergy (39.7 to 60% of cases) and eczema (29.5 to 45.6%). Photoaggravation was infrequent (7.9 to 10.3%). Cases of phototoxicity were rare. Sesquiterpenic lactones constantly provoked photoallergy, with 12 cases in 10 years. Although phenothiazines were the most photosensitizing allergens up until 1995, they were then overridden by ketoprofen in 1996 with 107 cases of UVA photosensitive reactions (75 cases) and total spectrum (32 cases). These were followed closely by sun screens, benzophenone (notably Eusolex 4360 with 54 pertinent cases of photoallergy) and dibenzoylmethane (with 31 cases due to Eusolex 8020). UVB filters were all potentially photosensitizing but to a lesser degree from 1 to 5 cases). DISCUSSION: Our results differ from those of Anglo-Saxon teams in the appearance of a new photoallergen, ketoprofen, which provoked numerous photosensitivities in both UVA and UVB. This justifies the systematic addition of this substance in our prospective set. Photoallergy was relatively rare, with around 100 cases reported within 10 years. Total spectrum irradiation of the photopatch tests revealed photoallergies that would not have been found with UVA alone. CONCLUSION: Study of photopatch tests has permitted the uniformization of the methodology in France, an overview of the frequency of the photoallergens tested and the development of a new standard set.

[Fluindione-induced acute exanthematous pustulosis with renal involvement]. / Pustulose exanthématique aiguë généralisée à la fluindione avec atteinte rénale.

INTRODUCTION: Fluindione (Previscan) is an oral anti-vitamin K anticoagulant, widely prescribed in France. Contrary to phenindione, which is also an indanedione derivative, very few cases of immunoallergic reactions have been described. CASE REPORT: A 68 year-old man, treated with fluindione for cardiac arrhythmia, presented with a pustular eruption and erythema twenty days after initiation of treatment. The eruption was associated with hyperthermia, arthralgia, neutrophilia (11,000/mm2), hepatic cytolysis and renal involvement including acute renal failure, hematuria and proteinuria. In view of the absence of any earlier case in the literature, we did not impute fluindione and the drug was reintroduced and led to the rapid recurrence of all the same manifestations. DISCUSSION: These manifestations were consistent with an immunoallergic reaction to fluindione (probable intrinsic imputability I3) and acute interstitial nephritis (probable intrinsic imputability I3). We believe this is the first case of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis induced by fluindione (intrinsic imputability Bo). A few rare cases of fluindione-induced hypersensitivity reactions and acute interstitial nephritis, however, have been described.