Characterization of the ultrasound beam produced by the MIST therapy, wound healing system.

The MIST Therapy wound healing device (Celleration, Eden Prairie, MN, USA), which uses low-frequency ultrasound to deliver an atomized saline spray to acute wounds, was evaluated in a laboratory environment. The output of the MIST device was characterized by its frequency, transmission in the presence and absence of the saline spray and intensity. When measured up to 500 mm away from the transducer tip, the transmission of 39.5 kHz ultrasound was not significantly attenuated by the saline itself. In the absence of the saline spray, the acoustic intensity range of the MIST device was calculated to be 429-188 mW cm(-2) across the manufacturer-specified treatment range (12.5-20 mm). Because of the acoustic impedance mismatch between air and soft tissue, the MIST Therapy device would deliver only 0.1% of this incident intensity into the wound site.

Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To measure the repeatability and pressure pulse envelope of simulators used for testing oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) devices; to study the effect of different envelopes on NIBP devices, and to measure the difference between NIBP devices due to different oscillometric algorithms. METHODS: Three different models of NIBP simulator and 18 different patient monitors with NIBP function were studied. We developed a pressure measurement system (accuracy 0.048?mmHg) to measure the repeatability of simulators. The effect of changing the envelope was measured by using three simulators with one NIBP device. Differences between 18 NIBP devices were measured using one simulator at seven blood pressure settings. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Simulators generate repeatable pressure pulse envelopes (< 0.2 mmHg) but the magnitude and shape depends on the model of simulator. Oscillometric NIBP devices are highly repeatable (< 2 mmHg) when presented with a repeatable pressure pulse envelope, but different devices employ different algorithms and give different results. For a simulated standard blood pressure setting of 120/80 mmHg, estimates of systolic pressure ranged from 112.6 to 126.6 mmHg (sd of 3.0 mmHg), and diastolic pressure ranged from 74.8 to 86.9 mmHg (sd of 3.5 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Simulators and NIBP devices are sufficiently repeatable for clinical use, but further systematic clinical studies are required to better characterize the pressure pulse envelope for different patient groups.

Low-cost oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure monitors: device repeatability and device differences.

Automated non-invasive blood pressure measuring devices based on the oscillometric technique are used widely for self-measurement and are often used in clinics in place of the manual, auscultatory method. Oscillometry was originally developed for monitoring purposes and there are questions over its suitability for making diagnostic measurements. This study measured the differences between automated devices, in the absence of physiological variability. We studied 19 low-cost, automated, non-invasive blood pressure devices, using a repeatable artificial arm simulator, and measured the within-device repeatability and between-device differences. We found that the devices were repeatable (mean within-device difference 1 mmHg), but between-device differences were 4.4 mmHg (systolic pressure) and 3.6 mmHg (diastolic pressure), for normal and high-normal blood pressures. Individual devices are sufficiently repeatable for clinical trend use, but differences between devices are sufficiently large that they may be misinterpreted as clinically significant.

Analgesic effects of different pulse patterns of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on cold-induced pain in normal subjects.

The analgesic efficacy of various pulse patterns of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) were assessed in 84 normal healthy subjects using the cold pressor pain technique. Burst, modulation, random and continuous TENS all significantly elevated ice pain threshold. Continuous (80 Hz) TENS produced the greatest mean elevation in threshold but the response to random TENS showed the least inter-subject variation. Ice pain tolerance was increased by all modes of TENS, continuous TENS producing the greatest magnitude of response, although these changes did not reach statistical significance. Increasing the size of electrodes reduced the effect of continuous TENS. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Analgesic effects of different frequencies of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on cold-induced pain in normal subjects.

The efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in producing analgesia in cold-induced pain was assessed using a range of 5 stimulating frequencies (10 Hz, 20 Hz, 40 Hz, 80 Hz and 160 Hz) in 83 normal healthy subjects. TENS significantly elevated ice pain threshold when compared with sham and control groups. TENS frequencies between 20 and 80 Hz produced greatest analgesia, while frequencies below and above this level (10 Hz and 160 Hz), although significantly elevating ice pain threshold, produced effects of a lesser magnitude. The frequency of pulse delivery was the governing factor as no significant differences in stimulus intensity were observed across the treatment groups. Measurement of ice pain tolerance was found to be unreliable under the present conditions. No significant relationships were observed between personality variables as measured by Eysenck Personality Questionnaires and the degree of TENS response.