Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Infect ; 75(1): 59-67, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28366686

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Candidaemia is a life-threatening infectious disease, associated with septic shock, multiple organ failure, and a high mortality rate. In France, reported data on the incidence of ICU-acquired candidaemia and the causative Candida species are scarce. The objective of this study was to determine temporal trends in epidemiology and risk factors of intensive care unit-acquired candidaemia (ICU-Cand) and ICU mortality among a very large population of ICU patients. METHOD: Demographics, patient risk factors, invasive device exposure and nosocomial infection in ICU patient were collected from 2004 to 2013 in a national network of 213 ICUs: REA-RAISIN. Incidence and risk factors for candidaemia and ICU mortality were assessed. RESULTS: Out of 246,459 ICU patients, 851 developed an ICU-cand, representing 0.3 per 1000 patients-days. The incidence rose sharply over time. Candida albicans was the main species. The overall and ICU mortality was 52.4% in ICU-cand patients. The main risk factors of ICU-cand were length of stay, severity of illness and antimicrobial therapy at ICU admission, immune status and use of invasive procedure. ICU-cand was an independent risk factor of mortality (OR: 1.53; 95%CI [1.40-1.70]); in a sub-group analysis, independent effects on mortality were observed with C. albicans (OR: 1.45 [1.23-1.71]), Candida tropicalis (OR: 2.11 [1.31-3.39]) and "other" Candida species (OR: 1.64 [1.09-2.45]). CONCLUSION: ICU candidaemia ranked sixth among bloodstream infections, and its average annual incidence was 0.3 per 1000 patients days. Despite of new therapy and international recommendation, the incidence rose sharply during the study period, and ICU mortality remained high.


Subject(s)
Candidemia/epidemiology , Candidemia/etiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units , Aged , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida/genetics , Candida/isolation & purification , Candidemia/drug therapy , Candidemia/mortality , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/transmission , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/microbiology , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prohibitins , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 65(9): 2028-36, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20581121

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic use in French hospitals is among the highest in Europe. A study was carried out to describe antibiotic consumption for inpatients at hospital and at ward levels. METHODS: Data were voluntarily collected retrospectively by 530 hospitals accounting for approximately 40 million patient-days (PD) on the following: antibacterials for systemic use [J01 class of the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification, defined daily doses (DDD) system, 2007], rifampicin and oral imidazole derivatives, expressed in number of DDD and number of PD in 2007. Consumption was expressed in DDD/1000 PD. RESULTS: Median antibiotic use ranged from 60 DDD/1000 PD in long-term care (LTC) and psychiatric hospitals to 633 DDD/1000 PD in teaching hospitals. Penicillins and beta-lactamase inhibitors combinations were the most frequently used antibiotics, accounting for 26% of total use in cancer hospitals to 40% in LTC/psychiatric hospitals. Glycopeptides and carbapenems were mostly used in cancer and teaching hospitals. Level of consumption and pattern of use differed according to clinical ward from 60 DDD/1000 PD in psychiatric wards up to 1466 DDD/1000 PD in intensive care units (ICUs). In medicine, surgery, ICU and rehabilitation wards, fluoroquinolones accounted for 13%-19% of the total use. CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre survey provided detailed information on antibiotic use in a large sample of hospitals and wards, allowing relevant comparisons and benchmarking. Analysis of consumption at the ward level should help hospitals to target practice audits to improve antibiotic use.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Administration, Oral , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , France , Hospitals , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Retrospective Studies
3.
Crit Care Med ; 33(4): 750-5, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15818100

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with granting or refusing intensive care unit (ICU) admission, to analyze ICU characteristics and triage decisions, and to describe mortality in admitted and refused patients. DESIGN: Observational, prospective, multiple-center study. SETTING: Four university hospitals and seven primary-care hospitals in France. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Age, underlying diseases (McCabe score and Knaus class), dependency, hospital mortality, and ICU characteristics were recorded. The crude ICU refusal rate was 23.8% (137/574), with variations from 7.1% to 63.1%. The reasons for refusal were too well to benefit (76/137, 55.4%), too sick to benefit (51/137, 37.2%), unit too busy (9/137, 6.5%), and refusal by the family (1/137). In logistic regression analyses, two patient-related factors were associated with ICU refusal: dependency (odds ratio [OR], 14.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.27-38.25; p < .0001) and metastatic cancer (OR, 5.82; 95% CI, 2.22-15.28). Other risk factors were organizational, namely, full unit (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.88-5.31), center (OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 2.27-6.39), phone admission (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14-0.40), and daytime admission (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32-0.84). The Standardized Mortality Ratio was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.19-1.69) for immediately admitted patients, 1.75 (95% CI, 1.60-1.84) for refused patients, and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.28-1.75) for later-admitted patients. CONCLUSIONS: ICU refusal rates varied greatly across ICUs and were dependent on both patient and organizational factors. Efforts to define ethically optimal ICU admission policies might lead to greater homogeneity in refusal rates, although case-mix variations would be expected to leave an irreducible amount of variation across ICUs.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Refusal to Treat/statistics & numerical data , Female , France/epidemiology , Hospital Bed Capacity/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Refusal/statistics & numerical data , Triage/statistics & numerical data
4.
Intensive Care Med ; 28(6): 712-8, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12107676

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether different indicators using for guiding volume expansion are valuable tools to assess edematous lung injury in patients with septic shock. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational clinical study in a university intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Sixteen consecutive mechanically ventilated patients developing septic shock with evidence of pulmonary edema on chest radiograph and severe hypoxemia (PaO(2)/FIO(2) <250 mmHg). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: A pulmonary artery catheter was used for the measurement of cardiac index (CI), central venous pressure (CVP), and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP). A fiberoptic catheter was placed in the descending aorta. Measurements of extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI), and total end-diastolic volume index (TEDVI) were obtained using the thermal dye dilution technique. Measurements were taken just after placement of catheters and 24 h later. Fluid balance was also estimated within the first 24 h. TEDVI and ITBVI were significantly correlated with EVLWI, but not CVP and PAOP. Analysis of 24-h changes showed that the changes in TEDVI and in ITBVI reflected the change in EVLWI, whereas PAOP, CVP, and fluid balance did not. CONCLUSIONS: Volume variables (TEDVI, ITBVI) are more useful indicators than pressure variables (CVP, PAOP) for assessment of EVLWI in septic patients with pulmonary edema.


Subject(s)
Blood Volume , Extravascular Lung Water , Hemodynamics , Pulmonary Edema/complications , Shock, Septic/complications , Adult , Aged , Blood Volume Determination , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Edema/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...