Management of Graves' ophthalmopathy by radiotherapy: A literature review.

Orbital radiotherapy for Graves' ophthalmopathy is an example of non-oncological radiotherapy. First introduced in the 1930s, this treatment has become widely used since the 1980s with several studies showing proof of both effectiveness and safety: a decrease of soft tissue involvement in 70 to 80% of patients and an improvement of ocular mobility in 30 to 80% of patients. Nowadays, it's one of the second line treatment options recognized by the European Group on Graves' orbitopathy in the management of a moderate to severe and active disease after failure of glucocorticoids. In that setting, orbital radiotherapy should be combined with glucocorticoids. To our knowledge, there are no practical recommendations on how orbital radiotherapy should be planned and conducted for Graves' ophthalmopathy. Optimal dose is not defined however the most frequent regimen consists of 20Gy in ten fractions of 2Gy, though other options may yield better results. Lastly, the use of modern technique of radiotherapy such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy may allow a better sparing of organs at risk compared to three-dimensional radiotherapy using lateral opposing fields.

Contribution of chemotherapy in immunoradiotherapy combinations.

Several preclinical data have suggested the ability of radiation therapy to modulate the intrinsic immunogenicity of cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment, with the aim of increasing responses to checkpoint inhibitors. Early results showing a restoration of checkpoint inhibitors response in patients following irradiation have generated a lot of enthusiasm around radiation therapy beyond its usual role in local disease control. Prospective clinical trials evaluating immunoradiotherapy combinations have provided proof-of-concept that radiation therapy may induce tumor-specific T immune responses in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors. However, these results are not always reproducible, reflecting the existence of factors related to either radiation therapy, immunotherapy and/or the host, which influence the efficacy of these combinations. Anticancer chemotherapy can play a role in amplifying the immune-radiation response by promoting tumor immunogenicity and modulating the tumor microenvironment.

Practice-changing clinical trials in radiation oncology for gastrointestinal malignancies in 2021-2023.

Gastrointestinal cancers are one of the most frequent cancers and a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. We provide an overview of the most important practice-changing trials that were either published or presented at the international scientific meetings in 2021-2023. Highlights included reports on three phase III trials (CONCORDE/PRODIGE 26, ARTDECO, and a study by Xu et al.) that evaluated dose escalation in the definitive setting for locally advanced oesophageal cancers, as well as two phase III trials that evaluated the role of chemotherapy (neo-AEGIS) and targeted therapy (NRG/RTOG 1010) in the neoadjuvant setting for adenocarcinoma oesophageal cancers or gastroesophageal junction cancer. CheckMate 577 evaluated nivolumab in patients who had residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by complete resection. The use of radiation therapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer is also discussed (SMART and CONKO-007 trials). Stereotactic body radiation therapy followed by sorafenib was compared to sorafenib alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the NRG/RTOG 1112 study. New options in the management of rectal cancer are emerging such as total neoadjuvant treatment (PRODIGE 23, RAPIDO, PROSPECT), organ preservation (OPRA, OPERA), and the role of immunotherapy in patients with DNA mismatch-repair deficient/microsatellite instability. Finally, preliminary results of the ACT 4 trial that evaluated de-escalation in anal cancer are presented.

[Dose-escalated radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: A review of the literature]. / Escalade de dose dans les cancers de l'œsophage : revue de la littérature.

For non-operable, localized esophageal cancer, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment. Currently, the radiation dose recommended is 50 to 50,4Gy. However, the optimal radiation dose remains controversial. Many studies have demonstrated that locoregional failure remains a common failure pattern, most likely to occur within the original gross tumor volume. Several retrospective studies have indicated that higher radiation dose may improve local control and survival while others failed to demonstrate improved oucomes. In three randomized trials (INT0123, ARTDECO, and CONCORDE), dose escalation did not improve locoregional control nor survival, establishing 50Gy as the standard chemoradiation dose for patients who will not undergo surgery. Here, we reviewed the results of dose escalation in the literature in the neoadjuvant and definitive settings.

Glassy cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: 20-year experience from a comprehensive cancer center.

PURPOSE: Glassy cell carcinoma (GCC) of the uterine cervix is a rare entity. This study aims at describing the clinical characteristics and outcomes of cervical GCC patients treated in a comprehensive cancer center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reported patients and tumors characteristics, therapeutic management, overall survival (OS), progression-free progression (PFS), relapse rates, and toxicities. RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2014, 55 patients were treated with curative intent. The median age at diagnosis was 41 years (range, 20-68). Among 22 patients with early stage tumors (IA2-IB1-IIA1), 17 had preoperative brachytherapy, followed by radical hysterectomy. Among 33 patients with locally advanced disease (≥IB2), 32 underwent chemoradiation±brachytherapy boost. After a median follow-up of 5.4 years (range, 0.15-21.7 years), 18/55 (33%) patients experienced tumor relapse. Local recurrence occurred in 2/22 (9%) patients with early disease (treated with upfront surgery) and in 3/32 (9%) patients with locally advanced disease. Most frequent relapses were distant, occurring in a total of 11/55 patients (20%). PFS rates at 5-year were 86.4% (95% CI: 63.4-95.4) for early stage versus 75.9% (95% CI: 55.2-89.2) for locally advanced stages, respectively (P=0.18). CONCLUSION: Large cohort data are warranted to guide the optimal management of GCC. From this retrospective analysis, a multimodal approach yielded to good disease control in early stages tumors. Given the high-risk of distant failure, consideration should be given to adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced disease.

Long-term outcomes and safety after reirradiation in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area.

PURPOSE: To determine outcomes and toxicities after reirradiation for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) and to apply a prognostic index in a non-endemic region. METHODS: We retrospectively reported progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicities in patients treated with curative intent for locally rNPC. We applied the prognostic model for OS and grade 5 radiotherapy (RT)-related toxicities published by Li et al. and evaluated its prognostic accuracy by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2018, 33 patients were treated for rNPC in our institution. Median follow-up was 60 months. The mean time to local recurrence was 75 months. Six (18%) patients had a persistent grade 3 toxicity from a previous RT course. The median re-RT dose was 66 Gy. After re-RT, 13 patients had local failure and 3 patients had metastatic recurrence. Median PFS was 18 months with a 5-year PFS rate of 29%. Median OS was 35 months with a 5-year OS rate of 37%. Grade 3 or higher toxicities rate was 74%. There were 21% grade 5 toxicities. The median time to a grade 5 toxicity was less than 6 months following re-RT. The prognostic nomogram was not predictive for OS or grade 5 toxicities. CONCLUSION: Reirradiation of rNPC is an effective treatment but is associated with a high rate of life-threatening toxicity. Stratification of patients based on their risk of developing severe toxicity is needed to select patients who will most likely benefit from re-RT.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Rectal Cancer after Chemoradiotherapy.

The aim of this overview was to investigate whether adjuvant chemotherapy has a favourable effect on the outcome of patients with rectal cancer who had preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy. A review of randomised clinical trials that allocated patients between fluorouracil-based and observation or between fluorouracil-based and oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy was carried out, including their corresponding meta-analyses. None of the five randomised trials has shown a significant benefit of fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for overall survival or disease-free survival. Also, the three corresponding meta-analyses failed to show a benefit of adjuvant treatment. Of three randomised trials - two phase III and one phase II with a 3-year disease-free survival end point - two showed a small benefit of adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil, one failed. The corresponding meta-analyses showed that the pooled difference was not significant. In conclusion, the use of postoperative 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy is not scientifically proven.