Clinical experience and outcomes of community-acquired and nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a northern Australian hospital.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a well-recognized cause of hospital-acquired sepsis. We reviewed the clinical features of a new variant of community-acquired MRSA originally described from the Kimberley region of northern Western Australia (WA MRSA). This strain has become an increasing cause of community- and hospital-acquired sepsis at Royal Darwin Hospital (RDH) in the Northern Territory, especially in Aboriginal Australians from remote communities. Fifty percent of WA MRSA was community-acquired, with 76% in Aboriginals. Like the MRSA from eastern Australia (EA MRSA), WA MRSA commonly caused skin sepsis but was less likely to cause respiratory or urinary infections compared with EA MRSA. Twelve out of 125 (9.6%) WA MRSA and 7/93 (7.5%) EA MRSA infections were septicaemias. Septicaemia due to WA MRSA occurred in adult medical patients, especially those with temporary haemodialysis catheters, while EA MRSA septicaemia occurred throughout the hospital. Aboriginal people were more likely to develop both community- and hospital-acquired WA MRSA septicaemia [overall relative risk (RR) 12.3 (95% CI 3.7-40.7)]. Control of WA MRSA requires policies to reduce transmission in both hospitals and communities. Community-based control programmes need support for individual patient management, improved housing and hygiene, control of skin sepsis and appropriate use of antibiotics, especially in rural Aboriginal communities in northern Australia.

Emerging epidemic of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in the Northern Territory.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the epidemiology of WA MRSA (the recently recognised Western Australian strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) in the north of the Northern Territory (NT). DESIGN: Retrospective survey of data from hospital records. SETTING: Royal Darwin Hospital (a tertiary referral hospital that serves the north of the NT) between January 1991 and July 1995. SUBJECTS: All inpatients with clinical MRSA infection. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of MRSA infection, classification of MRSA as WA or EA (Eastern Australian) based on antibiotic susceptibility, patient demographic details (age, sex, ethnicity, region of residence), source of infection (nosocomial or community-acquired). RESULTS: There were 125 WA MRSA and 93 EA MRSA infections, comprising 7% of all S. aureus infections. The incidence of WA MRSA infections consistently increased, while that of EA MRSA initially fell and then increased. All EA MRSA infections were nosocomial, while 50% of WA MRSA infections were community-acquired. Rates of WA MRSA infections were highest in patients from the west region of the NT, adjacent to the Kimberley region of Western Australia (WA). Community-acquired WA MRSA infections were more likely to affect Aboriginals than non-Aboriginals (relative risk [RR], 25.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.51-53.47, based on population data; RR, 15.43; 95% CI, 7.85-30.32, based on admission data), as were nosocomial EA MRSA infections (RR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.44-4.47, based on population data; RR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.52-3.46, based on admission data). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the epidemiology of MRSA infection in the north of the NT are consistent with the hypothesis that community-acquired WA MRSA spread into and across the NT from the Kimberley region of WA. Alternatively, crowded living conditions, hygiene difficulties and increasing use of broad spectrum antibiotics may have led to independent emergence of WA MRSA in both regions. Current infection control policies and their use in rural Aboriginal communities must be reassessed.