Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 142(1): 70-6, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20798186

ABSTRACT

Children are identified as a vulnerable population in the case of radiological events because of their increased physical sensitivity to radiation and its impact on critical development stages. Using a comprehensive integrated risk framework, psychosocial risk protective factors are discussed in a social ecology paradigm. Children have been shown to be both vulnerable and resilient; they are both easily impressionable and also quick to adapt and learn. Psychosocial interventions during, after and most efficiently before an event can improve outcome, especially if they involve parents and schools, media and work organisations. Public education through children should be encouraged to increase knowledge of radiation and strategies to minimise exposure and irradiation. Children can become vectors of prevention, preparedness and mitigation through information and behavioural rehearsal. Special consideration must therefore be given to education, school programmes, practice rehearsal and media exposure.


Subject(s)
Disaster Planning , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/psychology , Radiation Protection , Radioactive Fallout/adverse effects , Child , Humans , Psychology
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 134(3-4): 207-14, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19447815

ABSTRACT

This paper was meant to be on 'vulnerable populations', as some population sub-groups do require special care, special planning and special integration of needs. However, the issue should be reframed in terms of groups at higher risks. The text explains how (1) there are contextual vulnerabilities, in (a) higher susceptibility, i.e. higher exposure to risk, (b) higher sensitivity, i.e. higher damage or higher brittleness, and (c) weaknesses and gaps in the emergency system; (2) that these higher susceptibility, sensitivity and system weaknesses involve important psychosocial considerations, which may stem from socio-demographic status or ripple effects in the community; and finally, (3) that addressing those 'soft spots' using the phrase 'vulnerable populations' can be misleading and disserving because it disempowers, stigmatises and deters one from a more thorough analysis.


Subject(s)
Civil Defense/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Disasters , Radiation Protection/methods , Risk Management/organization & administration , Vulnerable Populations , Canada , Disaster Medicine/organization & administration , Humans , Psychology , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors
3.
Biosecur Bioterror ; 3(4): 316-30, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16366841

ABSTRACT

Evidence in the disaster mental health literature indicates that psychosocial consequences of terrorism are a critical component of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) events, both at the clinical level and the normal behavioral and emotional levels. Planning for such psychosocial aspects should be an integral part of emergency preparedness. As Canada and other countries build the capacity to prevent, mitigate, and manage CBRN threats and events, it is important to recognize the range of social, psychological, emotional, spiritual, behavioral, and cognitive factors that may affect victims and their families, communities, children, the elderly, responders, decision makers, and others at all phases of terrorism, from threat to post-impact recovery. A structured process to assist CBRN emergency planners, decision makers, and responders in identifying psychosocial risks, vulnerable populations, resources, and interventions at various phases of a CBRN event to limit negative psychosocial impacts and promote resilience and adaptive responses is the essence of our psychosocial risk assessment and management (P-RAM) framework. This article presents the evidence base and conceptual underpinnings of the framework, the principles underlying its design, its key elements, and its use in the development of decision tools for responders, planners, decision makers, and the general public to better assess and manage psychosocial aspects of CBRN threats or attacks.


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Risk Assessment/methods , Terrorism/psychology , Canada , Communication , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Humans , Risk Management , Social Behavior
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...