Outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Owing to recent advances in cancer therapy, updated data are required for clinicians counselling patients on treatment of spinal metastases. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases. METHODS: Prospective and multicentric study that included consecutively patients operated on for spinal metastases between January 2016 and January 2017. Overall survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate hazard ratio (HR) analysing mortality risk according to preoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS), mobility level and neurological status. RESULTS: A total of 252 patients were included (145 males, 107 females) aged a mean 63.3 years. Median survival was 450 days. Primary cancer sites were lung (21%) and breast (19%). Multiple spinal metastases involved 122 patients (48%). Concomitant skeletal and visceral metastases were noted in 90 patients (36%). Main procedure was laminectomy and posterior fixation (57%). Overall, pain and mobility level were improved postoperatively. Most patients had normal preoperative motor function (50%) and remained so postoperatively. Patients "bedbound" on admission were the less likely to recover. In-hospital death rate was 2.4% (three disease progression, one septic shock, one pneumonia, one pulmonary embolism). Complication rate was 33%, deep wound infection was the most frequent aetiology. Higher mortality was observed in patients with poorest preoperative KPS (KPS 0-40%, HR = 3.1, p < 0.001) and mobility level ("bedbound", HR = 2.16, p < 0.001). Survival seemed also to be linked to preoperative neurological function. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatments helped maintain reasonable condition for patients with spinal metastases. Intervention should be offered before patients' condition worsen to ensure better outcomes.

Correction to: Outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases: a prospective study.

The correct name of F. Saihlan should be F. Sailhan.

Single-use versus reusable medical devices in spinal fusion surgery: a hospital micro-costing analysis.

PURPOSE: Healthcare facilities could minimize the cost of surgical instrument and implant processing by using single-use devices. The main objective was to prospectively compare the total cost of a single-use and reusable device used in short lumbar spine fusion. METHODS: A 1-year, single-centre, prospective study was performed on patients requiring a one- or two-level lumbar arthrodesis. Patients were randomized in two groups treated with either reusable or single-use device. A cost minimization analysis was performed using a micro-costing approach from a hospital perspective. Every step of the preparation process was timed and costed based on hourly wages of hospital employees, cleaning supplies and hospital waste costs. RESULTS: Forty cases were evaluated. No significant difference in operation time was noted (reusable 176.1 ± 68.4 min; single use 190.4 ± 71.7 min; p = 0.569). Mean processing time for single-use devices was lower than for reusable devices (33 min vs. 176 min) representing a cost of 14€ versus 58€ (p < 0.05). Pre-/post-sterilization and spinal set recomposing steps were the most time-consuming in reusable device group. A total cost saving of 181€ per intervention resulted from the use and processing of the single-use device considering an additional sterilization cost of 137€ with the reusable device. The weight of the reusable device was 42 kg for three containers and 1.2 kg for the single-use device. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the absence of re-sterilization, single-use devices in one- and two-level lumbar fusion allow significant money and time savings. They may also avoid delaying surgery in case of reusable device unavailability.

[A giant sacral chordoma resection and reconstruction with a gluteal perforator flap, a case report and literature review]. / Chordome géant du sacrum et reconstruction par lambeau perforant glutéal supérieur, à propos d'un cas clinique et revue de la littérature.

BACKGROUND: Sacral chordomas are rare primary bone tumors and represent more than half of all primary malignant sacral tumors. Surgical resection is the only treatment with close to 50% of remission at 10 years, with or without radiotherapy. This tissue removal can be very extensive and morbid, particularly for evolved tumors. The reconstruction mostly uses myocutaneous flaps, notably the gluteus maximus flap and the latissimus dorsi flap, increasing morbidity of the surgical procedure. To avoid a muscular sacrifice and reduce the post-surgical morbidity, we describe the case of a patient who underwent a giant sacral chordoma resection and a reconstruction with a superior gluteal artery perforator flap. CASE REPORT: A 57-y.o. patient with a voluminous sacral chordoma had undergone a partial sacrectomy and abdomino-perineal resection. Firstly, a laparoscopy was realized to create a colostomy, to dissect an omental flap and to prepare the monobloc resection. In a prone position, the resection of the tumor was achieved and a de-epithelialized superior gluteal artery perforator flap was performed to fill the space and to support pelvic organs. CONCLUSION: For resections of sacral chordomas, coelioscopy has considerably reduced the surgical morbidity. However, the majority of reconstructions use myocutaneous flaps, specifically gluteus maximus and latissimus dorsi, which their postural function is considerable. Muscular sacrifice can lead to functional impotence with difficulty walking and standing up and run contrary to the diminution morbidity initiated by oncologic surgeons.

Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical spine is part of the spine with the most mobility in the sagittal plane. It is important for surgeons to have reliable, simple and reproducible parameters to analyse the cervical. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This study is a systematic review and a critique of current parameters to help improve the study of cervical spinal balance. We conducted a systematic search of PUBMED/MEDLINE for literature published since January 2014. Only studies written in English and containing abstracts were considered for inclusion. The search performed was: «C7 slope¼ OR «T1 slope¼ OR «C2C7 offset¼ OR «C2C7 lordosis¼ OR «cervical SVA (sagittal vertical axis)¼ OR «TIA (thoracic inlet angle)¼ (Lee et al., J Spinal Disord Tech 25(2):E41-E47, 2012) OR «SCA (spino-cranial angle)¼. Exclusion criteria were purely post-operative and cadaveric analysis, studies performed with CT scan or MRI, studies on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, traumatology studies and no standing analysis of the cervical spine. Relevance was confirmed by investigators if cervical parameters was a major criteria of the study. RESULTS: 138 articles were found by the electronic search. After complete evaluation 20 articles were selected. The large majority of papers used the same parameters C2_C7 lordosis, C2-C7 SVA, T1 slope or C7 slope and T1 slope/cervical lordosis mismatch. Janusz reported a new parameter using a retrospective cohort of patient with cervical radiculopathy: the TIA (thoracic inlet angle). Le Huec reported an other new parameter based on a prospective study of asymptomatic volunteer: the spino-cranial angle (SCA). This parameter is highly correlated with the C7 slope and the cervical lordosis. Other studies reported parameters that are more global balance analysis including the cervical spine than cervical spine balance itself. CONCLUSION: The most important parameters to analyse the cervical sagittal balance according to the literature available today for good clinical outcomes are the following: C7 or T1 slope, average value 20°, must not be higher than 40°. cSVA must not be less than 40°C (mean value 20 mm). SCA (spine cranial angle) must stay in a norm (83° ± 9°). Future studies should focus on those three parameters to analyse and compare pre and post op data and to correlate the results with the quality of life improvement.

Thoracic disc herniation: Surgical treatment.

Thoracic disc herniation is rare and mainly occurs between T8 and L1. The herniation is calcified in 40% of cases and is labeled as giant when it occupies more than 40% of the spinal canal. A surgical procedure is indicated when the patient has severe back pain, stubborn intercostal neuralgia or neurological deficits. Selection of the surgical approach is essential. Mid-line calcified hernias are approached from a transthoracic incision, while lateralized soft hernias can be approached from a posterolateral incision. The complication rate for transthoracic approaches is higher than that of posterolateral approaches; however, the former are performed in more complex herniation cases. The thoracoscopic approach is less invasive but has a lengthy learning curve. Retropleural mini-thoracotomy is a potential compromise solution. Fusion is recommended in cases of multilevel herniation, herniation in the context of Scheuermann's disease, when more than 50% bone is resected from the vertebral body, in patients with preoperative back pain or herniation at the thoracolumbar junction. Along with complications specific to the surgical approach, the surgical risks are neurological worsening, dural breach and subarachnoid-pleural fistulas. Giant calcified herniated discs are the largest contributor to myelopathy, intradural extension and postoperative complications. Some of the technical means that can be used to prevent complications are explored, along with how to address these complications.

Arthroscopic double-row cuff repair with suture-bridging: a structural and functional comparison of two techniques.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the functional and structural outcomes of 2 techniques for double-row, suture-bridging cuff repair. METHODS: A consecutive series of 73 patients who underwent arthroscopic, double-row, suture-bridge primary rotator cuff repair of full-thickness supraspinatus tear were evaluated. Thirty-eight shoulders were repaired by the arthroscopic, tied, suture-bridging technique (group A), and 35 shoulders by knot-less bridging with suture tape material (group B). Constant scores, pain, range of motion, strength, and complications were measured after a minimum follow-up period of 12 months post-operatively. Structural integrity of the repairs was evaluated systematically by either magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography arthrography. RESULTS: Median follow-up after surgery was 29 (23-32) months in group A, and 21 (12-23) months in group B. Mean pain relief, range of motion, strength, and constant score improved significantly in both groups. No statistical differences were found between groups in the post-operative period. According to control imaging, the re-tear rate trended to be higher in group A (23.4 %) than in group B (17.1 %), although not significantly. CONCLUSION: Both bridging repair techniques achieved successful functional outcomes. In terms of structural outcome, the knot-less tape-bridging construct showed a lower but not significant re-tear rate. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results and to evaluate potential differences between the two techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: A prospective, non-randomized, comparative study, Level III.