Effect of the implementation of a checklist in the prehospital management of a traumatised patient.

BACKGROUND: In October 2021, French acute care societies jointly published cognitive aids to standardise practices and limit cognitive biases to ensure greater safety in management of severe trauma patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a checklist on emergency physicians' adherence to the recommendations. METHODS: This prospective before-and-after study study took place in a French mobile emergency and resuscitation service. All adults trauma patients referred to hospital were included. A checklist on trauma management inspired by the MARCHE acronym was produced. During phase I, the checklist was performed within 24 h after the end of the intervention. During phase II, the checklist was performed during the patient's transport to hospital, thus allowing potentially omitted procedures to be performed initially. The use of the checklist was systematically evaluated using an anonymous questionnaire among doctors and nurses. In phase II, doctors and nurses who did not perform checklist were systematically asked to answer a specific online questionnaire. The primary outcome was the overall omission rate of checklist items during each phase of the study. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen patients were included, 53 in phase I and 63 in phase II. Eleven patients did not have a checklist in phase II. The overall omission rate of checklist items was significantly lower with checklist (17%) than without (25%) (p = 0.02). This trend increased in proportion to severity with an omission rate of 30% without checklist versus 15% with checklist (p = 0.03) for patients with an ISS ≥ 25. A majority of doctors and nurses who used the checklist considered that it should be made compulsory (82% and 67% respectively). Paradoxically, only 55% of doctors who did not perform the checklist thought it was useful, while the omission rate was significantly higher (17% with checklist compared with 59% without checklist, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This work shows a significant reduction in the number of omissions on the actions carried out during the management of a trauma patient in prehospital settings, allowing better adherence to the recommendations. Its benefit is increased in severely traumatised patients.

Deployment of the French Civil Protection Field Hospital (ESCRIM) in Gölbasi, Turkey after the February 2023 Earthquake: Lessons Learned.

Following the two earthquakes that occurred in Turkey on February 6, 2023 with magnitudes of 7.8 and 7.5, causing over 50,000 deaths and 100,000 injuries, France proposed to deploy, via the European Union Civil Protection Mechanism (EUCPM), the French Civil Protection Field Hospital (ESCRIM [Élément de Sécurité Civile Rapide d'Intervention Médicale]): the French World Health Organization (WHO)-classified Emergency Medical Team (EMT) Level 2 (EMT2).After the acceptance from Turkey on February 8, a disaster assessment team (DAT) was sent on February 10, 2023. It was decided, with local health authorities (LHA), to set up the field hospital in Gölbasi, Adiyaman Province where the State Hospital was closed due to a structural risk.Arriving in Gölbasi on February 13 at 2:00am in -12°C (10°F) temperatures, the detachment had no choice but to begin setting up the base of operation (BoO). At dawn, the cold was so intense that one doctor suffered from frostbite. Once the BoO was installed, the team set up the hospital tents. From 11:00am, the sun melted the snow and the ground became very muddy. The objective being to open the hospital as soon as possible, installation of the hospital continued, and it opened on February 14 at 12:00pm/noon, less than 36 hours after on-site arrival.This article describes the mechanics of setting up an EMT-2 in a cold climate, the many problems encountered, and the solutions imagined and proposed.

Use of prehospital transfusion by French emergency medical services: A national survey.

BACKGROUND: Major bleeding is the leading cause of preventable mortality among trauma patients. Several studies have recently shown that prehospital plasma transfusion improves the outcomes of severely injured patients. Although no consensus has been reached, prehospital transfusion is regularly considered to reduce avoidable mortality. The objective was to assess the status of prehospital transfusion practices in France. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A national survey among the 378 advance life support emergency teams (SMURs) in metropolitan France was conducted from December 15, 2020 to October 31, 2021. A questionnaire was distributed by e-mail to the physicians in charge of SMURs. The questions addressed the transfusion modalities, labile blood products (LBPs) used, and limitations encountered in implementing transfusion. RESULTS: The response rate was 48%, and 82% of the respondents performed prehospital transfusions. A designated pack was used by 44% of the respondents. The LBPs used were packed red blood cells (100%), of which 95% were group 0 RH:-1, fresh frozen plasma (27%), lyophilized plasma (7%), and platelets (1%). The LBPs were transported in isothermal boxes (97%) without temperature monitoring in 52% of the cases. Nontransfused LBPs were discarded in 43% of the cases. Reported limitations in implementing transfusion were the delivery time (45%), loss of LBPs (32%), and lack of evidence (46%). DISCUSSION: Prehospital transfusion was developed in France but access to plasma remains difficult. Protocols allowing the reutilization of LBPs and improving conservation could limit the waste of a rare resource. Implementing the use of lyophilized plasma could facilitate prehospital transfusion. Future studies will need to specify the role of each LBP in the prehospital setting.

Evaluation of the implementation of personal protective equipment for French military firefighters in a CBRN context.

INTRODUCTION: Military firefighters are the first responders in the event of a chemical, biological, radiation, and nuclear (CBRN) event in the Marseille area. They receive initial training to intervene safely in a CBRN context. We wanted to evaluate the use of CBRN personal protective equipment (PPE) at a distance from this training. METHOD: A prospective observational bicentric descriptive study on 20 operational firefighters operating on rescue and emergency vehicles. Two PPE dressing sessions, separated by 3 months, were evaluated and timed. A reminder of the correct procedure was given by the investigator after the first dressing. RESULTS: On average, 60.5 percent of the steps were correctly performed during the first dressing and 83 percent during the second dressing. Between the two dressings, there was a significant improvement (p < 0.01) in the team verification of the dressing and the chronological order of the dressing as well as the actions to be taken before dressing (remembering to make oneself comfortable, to urinate, to drink). The second dressing is on average 21 seconds faster than the first. Professional training and exercise experience of the firefighters in CBRN improve the success and speed of dressing in the absence of a prior reminder. CONCLUSION: Shorter and more frequent training and exercises, which simulate real-life situations for firefighters, lead to safer, more competent and faster donning of PPE.

Mass Casualty Incident: Do Tactical Tag Bracelets Improve Triage Performance by First Responders? A Randomized Controlled Mass Casualty Incident Simulation and Response of A French Gendarmerie Elite Unit.

INTRODUCTION: Tactical triage replaces primary triage in the exclusion zone in mass murder or terrorist events to prioritize victims requiring life-saving interventions (LSIs) and/or rapid extraction in an environment with a lack of resources and under active threat. French gendarmerie tactical unit medical teams use triage bracelets during mass casualty incidents (MCIs). This study assessed the value of these bracelets in the tactical triage performance of nonhealthcare combat rescue operators in an MCI simulation. OBJECTIVES: To compare triage performance with and without the use of bracelets based on categorization accuracy, LSIs, and time to end triage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of operators were randomly assigned to participate in an MCI simulation alone (10 simulated patients) with (intervention group) or without (control) bracelets. The primary outcome was triage performance assessed by the mass casualty triage performance assessment tools. The results were measured based on the LSI required, triage category, and time of completion of the task. Secondary outcomes were operator-perceived stress and self-efficacy. RESULTS: Eleven operators (intervention group n = 5, control group n = 6) participated. Triage performance, based on a maximum score of 90, was better for the intervention group [72.200 (SD = 10.330) vs. 57.000 (SD = 12.961), P = .045]. Self-efficacy was increased after the simulation in the intervention group [45.00 47.2 (SD = 4.147) vs. 50.400 (SD = 5.505), P = .034)]. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show the best triage performance among nonhealthcare combat rescuers using triage bracelets in an MCI simulation. The small sample size did not allow for external validity of the results. The initially calculated number of participants (N = 12) was not reached for operational reasons. The use of bracelets may have a place in the medico-organizational act of tactical triage during MCIs in exclusion zones. Further studies should be conducted to assess the value of triage bracelets by other first responders, including physician-nurse teams.

Correction to: Intranasal sufentanil given in the emergency department triage zone for severe acute traumatic pain-a randomized double­blind controlled trail: comment.

In the original publication, the doses of sufentanil were incorrectly published.