Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38346491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Nodal metastases in the central compartment are frequent in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). However, they are mostly micrometastases with no impact on survival and their relevance on the risk of locoregional relapse is controversial. There is no consensus regarding optimal management of the central neck in patients with PTC cN0. In our center, we do not perform prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND). The objective of this study is to review our long-term results and compare them with the most recent literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with PTC who underwent total thyroidectomy (TT) without CND between 2005 and 2017. Primary result was disease-free survival in the neck (DFS). RESULTS: 321 patients were identified, mostly T1-T2 tumors (94.1%). Median follow-up was 90 months. DFS in the central compartment was excellent (96.1% at 10 year's follow-up). 19 patients had cervical recurrence, of which 15 underwent salvage surgery. On their last visit, including salvage surgery when appropriate, 77% of patients had excellent response, 18.7% had indeterminate response, 3.1% had biochemically incomplete response and 1.2% had morphologically incomplete response. Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis after TT was transient in 4.7% of patients and permanent in 0.9% of patients. There were no RLN paralysis after salvage surgery. Permanent hypoparathyroidism occurred in 3.4% of patients. Only one patient had hypoparathyroidism after salvage surgery and it was permanent. CONCLUSIONS: Based on long-term results and low rate of complications associated with salvage surgery in our experience, we consider routine pCND is not justified.

2.
J Voice ; 37(5): 799.e13-799.e15, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34088573

ABSTRACT

The spinal accessory nerve innervates the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles, but the internal branch from the spinal accessory nerve is also contributing to the motor innervation of the larynx. For the first time, we report a case of an impairment of sternocleidomastoid, trapezius, and thyroarytenoid muscles from the same side. In our case, the anatomical variant that can explain this situation implies the cranial roots and some fibers from the spinal roots of the spinal accessory nerve to form the internal branch. In the case of agenesis of these spinal roots, the muscles reliant on it would be missing. For this reason, it is advisable to rule out laryngeal problems in patients with sternocleidomastoid and/or trapezius muscles impairment.


Subject(s)
Accessory Nerve , Vocal Cords , Humans , Accessory Nerve/physiology , Neck Muscles , Laryngeal Muscles/innervation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...