Robotic Medtronic Hugo™ RAS System Is Now Reality: Introduction to a New Simulation Platform for Training Residents.

The use of robotic surgery (RS) in urology has grown exponentially in the last decade, but RS training has lagged behind. The launch of new robotic platforms has paved the way for the creation of innovative robotics training systems. The aim of our study is to test the new training system from Hugo™ RAS System-Medtronic. Between July 2020 and September 2022, a total of 44 residents from urology, gynaecology and general surgery at our institution participated in advanced robotic simulation training using the Hugo™ RAS simulator. Information about sex, age, year of residency, hours spent playing video games, laparoscopic or robotic exposure and interest in robotics (90.9% declared an interest in robotics) was collected. The training program involved three robotic exercises, and the residents performed these exercises under the guidance of a robotics tutor. The residents' performance was assessed based on five parameters: timing, range of motion, panoramic view, conflict of instruments and exercise completion. Their performance was evaluated according to an objective Hugo system form and a subjective assessment by the tutor. After completing the training, the residents completed a Likert scale questionnaire to gauge their overall satisfaction. The rate of the residents' improvement in almost all parameters of the three exercises between the first and the last attempts was statistically significant (p < 0.02), indicating significant progress in the residents' robotic surgical skills during the training. The mean overall satisfaction score ± standard deviation (SD) was 9.4 ± 1.2, signifying a high level of satisfaction among the residents with the training program. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the training program utilizing the Hugo™ RAS System is effective in enhancing robotic surgical skills among residents and holds promise for the development of standardized robotics training programs in various surgical specialties.

Predictors of mid-term functional outcomes for robot-assisted Madigan simple prostatectomy: results of a multicentric series according to the BPH-6 achievement.

BACKGROUND: BPH-6 achievement remains an objective far to be evaluated for every technique currently available for the surgical management of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) with the goal of preserving ejaculatory function. The aim of this study was to evaluate predictors of BPH-6 achievement of urethral-sparing robot assisted simple prostatectomy (us-RASP) on a large series performed at two tertiary-care centers. METHODS: Two institutional us-RASP datasets were merged, considering eligible all patients with a follow-up >12 months. Baseline, perioperative and functional data according to BPH-6 endpoint were assessed. Descriptive analysis was used. Frequencies and proportions were reported for categorical variables while medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were reported for continuously coded variables. A logistic regression model was built to identify predictors of BPH-6 achievement. For all statistical analyses, a two-sided P<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Study cohort consisted of 94 eligible patients. The median follow-up was 40.7 months (IQR 31.3-54.2). Overall BPH-6 achievement was 54.7%. Compared to baseline, reduction of ≥30% in IPSS was observed in 93.6% of patients, reduction of <6 points for SHIM in 95.7% and response to MSHQ-EjD question 3 indicating emission of semen in 72.6%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, prostate volume between 110-180 mL (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01-0.92; P=0.043) and higher preoperative SHIM score (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.05-1.32; P<0.01) were independent predictors of BPH-6 metric achievement. CONCLUSIONS: us-RASP may provide a complete resolution of BOO and preservation of ejaculatory function in sexually active men with a prostate volume ranging 110-180 mL.

On-Clamp vs. Off-Clamp Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for cT2 Renal Tumors: Retrospective Propensity-Score-Matched Multicenter Outcome Analysis.

We compared perioperative outcomes after on-clamp versus off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for >7 cm renal masses. A multicenter dataset was queried for patients who had undergone RAPN for a cT2cN0cM0 kidney tumor from July 2007 to February 2022. The Trifecta achievement (negative surgical margins, no severe complications, and ≤ 30% postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reduction) was considered a surrogate of surgical quality. Overall, 316 cases were included in the analysis, and 58% achieved the Trifecta. A propensity-score-matched analysis generated two cohorts of 89 patients homogeneous for age, ASA score, preoperative eGFR, and RENAL score (all p > 0.21). Compared to the on-clamp approach, OT was significantly shorter in the off-clamp group (80 vs. 190 min; p < 0.001), the incidence of sRFD was lower (22% vs. 40%; p = 0.01), and the Trifecta rate higher (66% vs. 46%; p = 0.01). In a crude analysis, >20 min of hilar clamping was associated with a significantly higher risk of sRFD (OR: 2.30; 95%CI: 1.13−4.64; p = 0.02) and with reduced probabilities of achieving the Trifecta (OR: 0.46; 95%CI: 0.27−0.79; p = 0.004). Purely off-clamp RAPN seems to be a safe and viable option to treat cT2 renal masses and may outperform the on-clamp approach regarding perioperative surgical outcomes.

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder: impact of learning curve and long-term assessment of functional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There is paucity of data about functional outcomes of Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder (ICON), and the impact of learning curve (LC) on those outcomes remains to be addressed. The aim of this study was to report long-term functional outcomes of our single center series of RARC with ICON, assessing the role of LC in their achievement. METHODS: Patients treated with Robot assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder in our center between January 2012 and August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative, clinical, perioperative, pathologic and functional data were reported. The first cases were divided in tertiles, for assessing the impact of learning curve on the outcomes evaluated. Long-term functional outcomes of the whole cohort were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 167 patients were included. Concerning tertiles analysis, operative time (P<0.001), incidence of low (P=0.002) and high grade (P=0.001) complications and hospital stay (P=0.04) decreased significantly over time. Day-time continence recovery probability was significantly lower in the initial case series (1-yr rate 68.4%, 87% and 89.8 for I, II and III tertile, respectively; P=0.04;). Accordingly, Trifecta achievement was significantly higher in II and III tertiles (P=0.01). At a median follow- up of 34 months, the incidence of significant renal function deterioration of the whole cohort was 16.7%. Overall, 12, 24 and 60-mo day-time continence rates were 74.8%, 82.7% and 82.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated at the beginning of the learning curve show worse perioperative and functional results. Once standardized the procedure, complications rates, hospital stay, and day-time continence recovery experienced a significant improvement. At a long-term analysis of functional outcomes of our patients, renal function preservation and continence recovery results are encouraging.

Fusion US/MRI prostate biopsy using a computer aided diagnostic (CAD) system.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of computer aided diagnostic (CAD) system on the detection rate of prostate cancer (PCa) in a series of fusion prostate biopsy (FPB). METHODS: Two prospective transperineal FPB series (with or without CAD assistance) were analyzed and PCa detection rates compared with per-patient and per-target analyses. The χ2 and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were applied to identify predictors of any and clinically significant (cs) PCa detection. Subgroup analyses were performed after stratifying for PI-RADS Score and lesion location. RESULTS: Out of 183 FPB, 89 were performed with CAD assistance. At per-patient analysis the detection rate of any PCa and of cs PCa were 56.3% and 30.6%, respectively; the aid of CAD was negligible for either any PCa or csPCa detection rates (P=0.45 and P=0.99, respectively). Conversely in a per-target analysis, CAD-assisted biopsy had significantly higher positive predictive value (PPV) for any PCa versus MRI-only group (58% vs. 37.8%, P=0.001). PI-RADS Score was the only independent predictor of any and csPCa, either in per-patient or per-target multivariable regression analysis (all P<0.029). In a subgroup per-patient analysis of anterior/transitional zone lesions, csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the CAD cohort (54.5%vs.11.1%, respectively; P=0.028), and CAD assistance was the only predictor of csPCa detection (P=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: CAD assistance for FPB seems to improve detection of csPCa located in anterior/transitional zone. Enhanced identification and improved contouring of lesions may justify higher diagnostic performance.

Bilateral ureteral tapering and secondary ureteroneocystostomy for late stenosis in a patient with bladder extrophy.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of severe hydronephrosis 20 years after bladder exstrophy (BE) repair, managed by bilateral ureteral tapering and secondary ureteroneocystostomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 21-year-old woman with a history of BE and ureteral reimplantation, presented with hematuria-dysuria syndrome and recurrent febrile urinary tract infections. After counselling, she elected to undergo bilateral ureteral tapering and second ureteroneocystostomy. CONCLUSION: Hydronephrosis secondary to ureteralvesical stricture in BE patients can be successfully managed with ureteral reimplantation associated to ureteral tapering even after a prior reimplantation.