Dairy farming technologies and the agency of cows.

Studies on animal cognition, emotion, language, culture, and politics have shown that non-human animals are agents who engage in self-willed actions and have an interest in shaping their own lives. In today's world, however, animals' lives are affected significantly by circumstances that humans have created, including animal farming systems. The current paper explores how the agency of cows relates to technology by reporting on fieldwork performed in the Dutch dairy sector. Multi-species ethnography was used as a flexible methodology that allowed readjusting questions and methods as our research developed. In the first research phase, observations and informal talks were held on six farms which had been recruited on the basis of convenience sampling and which were each visited for one full day. In the second research phase, five more farms were selected for 1-day visits through theoretical and snowball sampling, and one farm was visited repeatedly for in-depth observations. The observational strategies used included following individual actors (farmers, cows or technologies) and documenting their interactions with other actors; participating in daily routines such as feeding cows roughage and scraping manure; witnessing cows' responses to non-routine events such as the introduction of new technologies or new cows; and sometimes waiting for notable occurrences by just 'hanging out' with cows. Observations and informal talks were in this research phase complemented by a small number of interviews with farmers, cow shed designers, and technology developers. Our main conclusion is that the agency of dairy cows is presupposed and mediated by dairy farming technologies. Dairy farming technologies presuppose cow in the 'scripts' and 'programs of action' which they enforce: they require cows to act in specific ways, anticipate some ways in which cows could disrupt technological routines, and (successfully or unsuccessfully) attempt to ensure cows' cooperation by appealing to their wants and desires and their ability to learn. Dairy farming technologies thus assign to cows not only the ability to perform 'metabolic labour' but also the capacity to act purposively and learning abilities. Technologies mediate cow agency by (co-)shaping how cows express agency in relation to other entities, including other cows, humans, other non-human animals, material entities including technologies, and the world at large. That technologies can be relevant for animal agency in various ways raises the question of how technologies can be designed for agency - although the concept of animal agency also challenges us to reconsider animal agriculture more fundamentally.

The Precautionary Principle in Zoonotic Disease Control.

The COVID-19 pandemic has shown that zoonotic diseases are a great threat for humanity. During the course of such a pandemic, public health authorities often apply the precautionary principle to justify disease control measures. However, evoking this principle is not without ethical implications. Especially within a One Health strategy, that requires us to balance public health benefits against the health interests of animals and the environment, unrestricted use of the precautionary principle can lead to moral dilemmas. In this article, we analyze the ethical dimensions of the use of the precautionary principle in zoonotic disease control and formulate criteria to protect animals and the environment against one-sided interpretations. Furthermore, we distinguish two possible conceptions of the precautionary principle. First, we notice that because of the unpredictable nature of zoonotic diseases, public health authorities in general focus on the idea of precaution as preparedness. This reactive response often leads to difficult trade-offs between human and animal health. We therefore argue that this policy should always be accompanied by a second policy, that we refer to as precaution as prevention. Although zoonotic diseases are part of our natural world, we have to acknowledge that their origin and global impact are often a consequence of our disturbed relation with animals and the environment.