Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 183: 15-20, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23388247

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the application of the Clinical Adoption (CA) Framework to evaluate the impact of a recently deployed electronic medical record (EMR) in a Canadian healthcare organization. The CA Framework dimensions evaluated were EMR quality, use and net benefits at the micro level; and people, organization and implementation at the meso level. The study involved clinical and support staff from two ambulatory care clinics, and managers and technical staff from the organization. A number of issues were identified at both levels of the CA Framework that had affected EMR adoption in the two clinics. Some perceived benefits in care coordination and efficiency were reported despite challenges that arose from early deployment decisions. There were five lessons that could be applied to other ambulatory care settings. The CA Framework has proved useful in making sense of ways that EMR can add value to the organization.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Information Systems/statistics & numerical data , Attitude of Health Personnel , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Health Records, Personal , Canada , Utilization Review
2.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 12: 42, 2012 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22621690

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Jurisdictional drug information systems are being implemented in many regions around the world. British Columbia, Canada has had a provincial medication dispensing record, PharmaNet, system since 1995. Little is known about how accurately PharmaNet reflects actual medication usage. METHODS: This prospective, multi-centre study compared pharmacist collected Best Possible Medication Histories (BPMH) to PharmaNet profiles to assess accuracy of the PharmaNet profiles for patients receiving a BPMH as part of clinical care. A review panel examined the anonymized BPMHs and discrepancies to estimate clinical significance of discrepancies. RESULTS: 16% of medication profiles were accurate, with 48% of the discrepant profiles considered potentially clinically significant by the clinical review panel. Cardiac medications tended to be more accurate (e.g. ramipril was accurate >90% of the time), while insulin, warfarin, salbutamol and pain relief medications were often inaccurate (80-85% of the time). 1215 sequential BPMHs were collected and reviewed for this study. CONCLUSIONS: The PharmaNet medication repository has a low accuracy and should be used in conjunction with other sources for medication histories for clinical or research purposes. This finding is consistent with other, smaller medication repository accuracy studies in other jurisdictions. Our study highlights specific medications that tend to be lower in accuracy.


Subject(s)
Drug Utilization Review/methods , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems , Humans , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...