Incidence and causes of tenosynovitis of the wrist extensors in long distance paddle canoeists.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence and causes of acute tenosynovitis of the forearm of long distance canoeists. METHOD: A systematic sample of canoeists competing in four canoe marathons were interviewed. The interview included questions about the presence and severity of pain in the forearm and average training distances. Features of the paddles and canoes were determined. RESULTS: An average of 23% of the competitors in each race developed this condition. The incidence was significantly higher in the dominant than the nondominant hand but was unrelated to the type of canoe and the angle of the paddle blades. Canoeists who covered more than 100 km a week for eight weeks preceding the race had a significantly lower incidence of tenosynovitis than those who trained less. Environmental conditions during racing, including fast flowing water, high winds, and choppy waters, and the paddling techniques, especially hyperextension of the wrist during the pushing phase of the stroke, were both related to the incidence of tenosynovitis. CONCLUSION: Tenosynovitis is a common injury in long distance canoeists. The study suggests that development of tenosynovitis is not related to the equipment used, but is probably caused by difficult paddling conditions, in particular uneven surface conditions, which may cause an altered paddling style. However, a number of factors can affect canoeing style. Level of fitness and the ability to balance even a less stable canoe, thereby maintaining optimum paddling style without repeated eccentric loading of the forearm tendons to limit hyperextension of the wrist, would seem to be important.

Stimulation of bone healing in new fractures of the tibial shaft using interferential currents.

The aim of this research was to establish whether interferential currents (IFC) could significantly reduce the healing time for fractures of the tibia and thereby prevent nonunion. Males between the ages of 12 and 86, who had sustained fractures of the tibiae, were entered into this double blind clinical trial. According to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, a final sample of 227 cases (208 subjects) were entered by block randomization into two groups; an experimental group (n = 41) and placebo group (n = 35). A further group was entered retrospectively--control group (n = 151). IFCs were applied to the experimental group via suction electrodes for 30 minutes per day for 10 days, using a beat frequency of 10-25 Hz and a swing mode of 6 integral of 6. The placebo group had only suction electrodes applied, the intermittent mode produced a rhythmical massage effect; subjects in this group commented on pain relief which resulted in the addition of the control group as a check on the possible effect of intermittent suction. The control group received no intervention. The data were analysed using analysis of covariance which resulted in a finding of no significant difference in the time taken to union for the three groups. This means that to date there is no reason to believe that IFCs (using the parameters of this trial) can reduce the healing time for new fractures of the tibia or prevent nonunion. However, further investigation is recommended.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs fail to enhance healing of acute hamstring injuries treated with physiotherapy.

The effects of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), meclofenamate and diclofenac, in combination with physiotherapy modalities on the rate of healing of acute hamstring muscle tears were studied in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fourty-four of the 75 patients with this injury recruited were assessed and randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: meclofenamate (100 mg 3 times a day), diclofenac (50 mg 3 times a day) and placebo. All patients received the same intensive physiotherapy treatment over the 7-day treatment period. Patient assessments were performed on days 1, 3 and 7 of the 7-day study period and included pain assessment (visual analogue scale), swelling measurement (thigh circumference measurement at the site of the muscle tear) and isokinetic muscle performance testing. Treatment produced a significant improvement in all measurements in all groups, but there was no difference in any measurement between groups. However, when only the more severe injuries were analysed, the reported pain score at day 7 was significantly lower in the placebo group than in either the meclofenamate group or the diclofenac group (P < 0.05). Hence this study did not find any additive effect on the healing of acute muscle injuries when meclofenamate or diclofenac was added to standard physiotherapeutic modalities. The study therefore does not support the use of NSAIDs in the treatment of acute hamstring muscle injuries.