Assessing the long-term priorities of pancreaticoduodenectomy survivors.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the long-term quality of life (QOL) and priorities of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) survivors. METHODS: Survivors were surveyed via internet-based support groups. The relative importance of longevity, experience, costs, and QOL were assessed. RESULTS: The PD cohort (n = 247, 35%) was 60 ± 12 years, 71% female, and 93% white. With moderate agreement, patients ranked survival most important, followed by functional and emotional well-being; costs and experience were least important (W = 35.7%, p < 0.001). Well-being improved throughout survivorship (P-QOL: 39 ± 12 at ≤3 mo vs 43 ± 12 at >10 y, p = 0.170; M-QOL: 38 ± 13 at ≤3 mo vs 44 ± 16 at >10 y; p = 0.015) but remained below the general population (p < 0.001). PD patients with benign diagnoses ranked functional independence as most important (2.00 ± 1.13 vs 2.63 ± 1.19, p < 0.001, W = 41.1%); PD patients with malignant diagnoses regarded overall survival most important (2.10 ± 1.20 vs 1.82 ± 1.22, p < 0.16, W = 35.1%). The mean rank order of priorities remained concordant between short-term (<1 year) and long-term (>5 years) survivors. CONCLUSION: PD survivors experience long-term mental and physical health impairments, underscoring the importance of functional and emotional support. Survivors place paramount importance on overall survival, functional independence, and emotional well-being. Cancer survivors prioritize longevity, while survivors of chronic benign conditions prioritize functional independence.

The association between perioperative opioids and breast cancer recurrence: a narrative review of the literature.

Background and Objective: Opioid use disorder is an evolving crisis, and 17.2% of postsurgical patients continue to fill an opioid prescription one year after surgery. Preclinical studies suggest perioperative opioid use, defined here as opioids used in the setting of operative pain, may be linked to inferior oncologic outcomes. If this were true, opioid minimization strategies for surgical patients may reduce opioid-related deaths in more than one way. This review aims to describe the association between perioperative opioid use and breast cancer recurrence. Methods: On November 1, 2021, we searched the Ovid and EMBASE databases for the terms "breast neoplasm", "opioid analgesics", "neoplasm recurrence", and "neoplasm metastasis". Of the 350 articles retrieved, 11 met our inclusion criteria. The review was undertaken using the enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ) checklist for quality. Key Content and Findings: Clinical studies report no clear association between perioperative opioid use and local or distant breast cancer recurrence. Mixed results were found when assessing perioperative opioid use and overall survival. Multiple studies paradoxically found opioid use to be associated with lower recurrence rates, despite higher mortality rates. Most studies showed no difference in recurrence or survival in breast cancer surgery patients who did or did not receive opioid-containing analgesia, although most findings were limited by study design and low event rates in patients with breast cancer. Conclusions: The lack of a clear connection between perioperative opioid use and breast cancer recurrence contradicts some preclinical data, which describes mechanisms through which opioids upregulate tumor proliferation which might worsen oncologic outcomes. Existing clinical literature is limited to mostly retrospective studies in patients with predominantly early-stage breast cancers, with low event rates. Given the worsening opioid epidemic and preclinical study findings, opioid minimization strategies should still be explored. Future work should be prospective and examine cancer recurrence in high-risk patients with more advanced tumor pathologies.

Reducing Alcohol and Opioid Use Among Youth in Rural Counties: An Innovative Training Protocol for Primary Health Care Providers and School Personnel.

BACKGROUND: Given that youth alcohol use is more common in rural communities, such communities can play a key role in preventing alcohol use among adolescents. Guidelines recommend primary care providers incorporate screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) into routine care. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to train primary care providers and school nurses within a rural 10-county catchment area in Pennsylvania to use SBIRT and facilitate collaboration with community organizations to better coordinate substance use prevention efforts. METHODS: To build capacity to address underage drinking and opioid use among youth aged 9-20 years, this project uses telehealth, specifically Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes), to train primary care providers and school nurses to address substance use with SBIRT. Our project will provide 120 primary care providers and allied health professionals as well as 20 school nurses with SBIRT training. Community-based providers will participate in weekly virtual ECHO sessions with a multidisciplinary team from Penn State College of Medicine that will provide SBIRT training and facilitate case discussions among participants. RESULTS: To date, we have launched one SBIRT ECHO project with school personnel, enrolling 34 participants. ECHO participants are from both rural (n=17) and urban (n=17) counties and include school nurses (n=15), school counselors (n=8), teachers (n=5), administrators (n=3), and social workers (n=3). Before the study began, only 2/13 (15.5%) of schools were screening for alcohol use. CONCLUSIONS: This project teaches primary care clinics and schools to use SBIRT to prevent the onset and reduce the progression of substance use disorders, reduce problems associated with substance use disorders, and strengthen communities' prevention capacity. Ours is an innovative model to improve rural adolescent health by reducing alcohol and opioid use. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/21015.

The dual burden of malnutrition in the United States and the role of non-profit organizations.

The dual burden of malnutrition (obesity or a non-communicable disease coupled with malnutrition) is prevalent in more than half of all malnourished households that reside in the US. Non-profit organizations should make a conscientious effort to not serve products high in sugar and saturated fat, and low in fiber. Instead, they should diligently serve nutrient-dense foods rich in produce, whole grains and omega 3 fatty acids to minimize health disparities prevalent in LSES households. Nonprofit organizations have the potential to decrease health disparities nationally by feeding health sustaining products such as whole grains, fresh produce and lean proteins. This commentary lists feasible options for organizations to serve healthier options and reduce health disparities such as implementing nutrition policies, capitalizing on donations and securing partnerships.