Wide variation in pre-procedural blood product transfusion practices in cirrhosis: a national multidisciplinary survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent guidelines recognize the limitations of standard coagulation tests in predicting bleeding and guiding pre-procedural blood component prophylaxis in cirrhosis. It is unclear whether these recommendations are reflected in clinical practice. We performed a nationwide survey to investigate pre-procedural transfusion practices and opinions of key health care stakeholders involved in managing cirrhosis. METHODS: We designed a 36-item multiple-choice questionnaire to investigate the international normalized ratio and platelet cutoffs utilized to guide pre-procedural transfusion of fresh frozen plasma and platelets in patients with cirrhosis undergoing a range of low and high-risk invasive procedures. Eighty medical colleagues from all mainland States involved in managing patients with cirrhosis were invited by email to participate. RESULTS: Overall, 48 specialists across Australia completed the questionnaire: 21 gastroenterologists, 22 radiologists, and 5 hepatobiliary surgeons. 50% of respondents reported that their main workplace did not have written guidelines relating to pre-procedural blood component prophylaxis in patients with cirrhosis. There was marked variation in routine prophylactic transfusion practices across institutions for the different procedures and international normalized ratio and platelet cutoffs. This variation was present both within and between specialty groups and held for both low and high-risk procedures. For scenarios where the platelet count was ≤ 50 × 109/L, 61% of respondents stated that prophylactic platelet transfusions would be given before low-risk and 62% before high-risk procedures at their center. For scenarios where the international normalized ratio was ≥2, 46% of respondents stated that prophylactic fresh frozen plasma would be routinely given before low-risk procedures and 74% before high-risk procedures. CONCLUSION: Our survey reveals significant heterogeneity of pre-procedural prophylactic transfusion practices in patients with cirrhosis and discrepancies between guidelines and clinical practice.

The Role of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Severe and/or Necrotic Pancreatitis in the Setting of Modern Minimally Invasive Management of Pancreatic Necrosis.

OBJECTIVES: The trend toward minimally invasive procedures (MIP) in necrotizing pancreatitis is increasing. The optimal timing and technique of cholecystectomy in severe/necrotizing pancreatitis is unclear. This study aims to determine the role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after severe/necrotizing pancreatitis in the context of MIP. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database was performed for consecutive patients after cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis between January 2011 and January 2018 at Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-five patients with gallstone pancreatitis underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with 2 conversions. Patients with severe pancreatitis were older (P = 0.002), with a more even sex distribution when compared with mild pancreatitis. Females predominated in the mild pancreatitis group.Patients with moderate/severe pancreatitis (P = 0.002) and necrosis (P > 0.001) were more likely to have delayed cholecystectomy compared with mild pancreatitis. There was no increase in biliary presentations while awaiting cholecystectomy. Length of stay for patients with severe/necrotizing pancreatitis (P = 0.001) was increased, surgical complications appeared similar. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely and effectively for pancreatitis, irrespective of severity. The paradigm shift in the management of severe necrotizing pancreatitis away from open necrosectomy toward MIP can be extended to encompass laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Feasibility study of two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility and early outcomes of 2-stage liver resection for bilobar metastases. METHODS: Data from 39 consecutive patients undergoing 2-stage hepatectomy between 2004 and 2010 were prospectively collected. RESULTS: The median age was 59 years (range, 33-79 years), and the ratio of men to women was 1.8:1. Metastases were colorectal carcinoma (n = 33), neuroendocrine tumors (n = 3), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 1), ocular melanoma (n = 1), and salivary gland carcinoma (n = 1). Perioperative chemotherapy was given to 32 patients (82%). Twenty-nine patients (74%) underwent portal venous embolization. Radiofrequency ablation was used in 8 patients (21%). Twenty-seven patients (69%) successfully completed clearance. For the 1st and 2nd stages, the median lengths of stay were 11 days (range, 6-53 days) and 13 days (range, 6-44 days), and morbidity rates were 23% and 56%. Liver insufficiency occurred in 2 (5%) and 6 (22%) patients. Overall mortality was 2.6%. For colorectal metastases, median survival in successes versus failures was 24 versus 10 months (P = .03), and 3-year survival was 30% versus 0%. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage hepatectomy is feasible, with 69% of patients achieving clearance with low mortality. Morbidity is significant, particularly transient hepatic insufficiency.