ABSTRACT
It is estimated that approximately 23.6 million people in the United States have diabetes mellitus. With adequate control of this disease and appropriate foot care and basic surveillance, many patients can lead active and healthy lifestyles. However, some patients experience complications associated with poorly controlled glucose levels, including lower-extremity ulcerations and infections. When conservative measures have failed in treating these conditions, a lower-extremity amputation is an option for patients seeking to gain maximal functional recovery. A complete preoperative workup includes assessment of healing potential and preoperative ambulatory status, control or optimization of comorbidities when possible, and determination of amputation level using modern diagnostic modalities. Once the decision to proceed with an amputation has been made, it is important to choose an appropriate level of amputation and practice sound surgical technique. This article describes the preoperative evaluation and operative techniques involved in performing amputations on diabetic patients and reviews the current literature on the most common lower-extremity amputations performed in the care of infections in the feet of patients with diabetes mellitus.
Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/methods , Diabetic Foot/surgery , Humans , Patient Care Team , Preoperative Care , Wound HealingABSTRACT
Charcot neuroarthropathy is a common cause of morbidity in persons with diabetes mellitus and sensory neuropathy. Although Charcot neuroarthropathy is rare, it likely will become more prevalent in conjunction with increased incidence of diabetes mellitus. Prevention of disease progression remains the mainstay of treatment, with surgical intervention usually reserved for refractory cases. Late deformities are often complicated by chronic ulceration, infection, and osteomyelitis. The clinical presentation is best summarized with the Eichenholtz classification, and progression often follows a predictable pattern. Although Charcot neuroarthropathy is a clinical diagnosis, recent advances in diagnostic imaging have eased the clinical challenge of deciphering infection from Charcot changes. Advances in surgical treatment have demonstrated new options for limb salvage. Pharmacologic therapies directed toward decreasing bone resorption have also shown promise for treatment, but clinical application remains theoretical.
Subject(s)
Ankle Joint , Arthropathy, Neurogenic , Foot Joints , Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging , Arthropathy, Neurogenic/diagnostic imaging , Arthropathy, Neurogenic/etiology , Arthropathy, Neurogenic/therapy , Casts, Surgical , Diabetes Complications/complications , Foot Joints/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Limb Salvage , Radiography , Weight-BearingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a removable cast walker (RCW) rendered irremovable (iTCC) with the total contact cast (TCC) in the treatment of diabetic neuropathic plantar foot ulcers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 41 consecutive diabetic patients with chronic, nonischemic, neuropathic plantar foot ulcers were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a RCW rendered irremovable by wrapping it with a single layer of fiberglass casting material (i.e., an iTCC) or a standard TCC. Primary outcome measures were the proportion of patients with ulcers that healed at =12 weeks, healing rates, complication rates, cast placement/removal times, and costs. RESULTS: The proportions of patients with ulcers that healed within 12 weeks in the iTCC and TCC groups were 80 and 74%, respectively (94 and 93%, respectively, when patients who were lost to follow-up were excluded). Survival analysis (healing rates) was statistically equivalent in the two groups, as were complication rates, but with a trend toward benefit in the iTCC group. The iTCC took significantly less time to place and remove than the TCC with 39% and 36% reductions, respectively. There was also an overall lower cost associated with the use of the iTCC compared with the TCC. CONCLUSIONS: The iTCC may be equally efficacious, faster to place, easier to use, and less expensive than the TCC in the treatment of diabetic plantar neuropathic foot ulcers.