Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Replacement for Degenerated Stentless Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for stentless bioprosthetic aortic valves (SBAVs) and to identify predictors of adverse events. BACKGROUND: ViV TAVR in SBAVs is associated with unique technical challenges and risks. METHODS: Clinical records and computer tomographic scans were retrospectively reviewed for procedural complications, predictors of coronary obstruction, mortality, and echocardiographic results. RESULTS: Among 66 SBAV patients undergoing ViV TAVR, mortality was 2 of 66 patients (3.0%) at 30 days and 5 of 52 patients (9.6%) at 1 year. At 1 year, left ventricular end-systolic dimension was decreased versus baseline (median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 3.0 [2.6 to 3.6] cm vs. 3.7 [3.2 to 4.4] cm; p < 0.001). Coronary occlusion in 6 of 66 procedures (9.1%) resulted in myocardial infarction in 2 of 66 procedures (3.0%). Predictors of coronary occlusion included subcoronary implant technique compared with full root replacement (6 of 31, 19.4% vs. 0 of 28, 0%; p = 0.01), short simulated radial valve-to-coronary distance (median [IQR]: 3.4 [0.0 to 4.6] mm vs. 4.6 [3.2 to 6.2] mm; p = 0.016), and low coronary height (7.8 [5.8 to 10.0] mm vs. 11.6 [8.7 to 13.9] mm; p = 0.003). Coronary arteries originated <10 mm above the valve leaflets in 34 of 97 unobstructed coronary arteries (35.1%). CONCLUSIONS: TAVR in SBAVs is frequently associated with high-risk coronary anatomy but can be performed with a low risk of death and myocardial infarction, resulting in favorable ventricular remodeling. A subcoronary surgical approach is associated with an increased risk of coronary obstruction.

Is Dysphagia After Cardiac Operations a "Preexisting Condition"?

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the incidence of dysphagia after cardiac operations, and very little is known about the baseline risk in this patient population. This study evaluated the incidence of dysphagia both preoperatively and postoperatively in patients undergoing cardiac operations. METHODS: Patients undergoing cardiac operations were screened for dysphagia preoperatively using a 90-mL water swallow challenge protocol, a mini cognitive/speech screen, and a modified oral mechanism screen. The tests were repeated after extubation once the patient was alert and oriented. Patient characteristics were analyzed in conjunction with the results of the swallow screens to identify risk factors for dysphagia. RESULTS: Of 176 patients tested, 15 (8.5%) failed the swallow screen preoperatively. Age, gender, and comorbidities were compared. Patients who failed the swallow study preoperatively were slightly older (76.1 vs 73.3 years, p = 0.047) and had a higher incidence of chronic renal failure (13.3% v. 0.6%, p = 0.017), but gender and other comorbidities were not significantly different. Postoperatively, 38 patients failed the swallow screen (21.6%). Those who failed the postoperative screen were also older (75.6 vs 72.9 years, p = 0.012), but other factors (including chronic renal failure) were not significantly different. All of the patients who failed the swallow screen preoperatively also failed postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Unrecognized dysphagia in patients who need cardiac operations is a common problem and accounts for a substantial portion of that seen postoperatively. Older patients are at increased risk of dysphagia, but gender and medical comorbidities are not useful predictors of this risk.

Sexual dimorphism in trauma? A retrospective evaluation of outcome.

PURPOSE: Multiple studies have demonstrated a heightened immune response in female animals subjected to trauma-hemorrhage models and have implied a subsequent survival advantage. PROCEDURES: A retrospective review of outcome in 15,170 trauma admissions over a 5-year-period (1993-1997) at a level 1-trauma center was performed. A comparison of outcome by gender, age, injury severity score (ISS), mechanism of injury, location of injury (AIS), and length of hospitalization (intensive care unit and total hospitalization) was performed. FINDINGS: There were 12,456 male and 2714 female patients included in the study. Overall survival rates (male = 90.2%, female = 90.8%) and survival of serious (ISS > or = 15) trauma (male = 63.5%, female = 60.5%) were not statistically different. Logistic regression analysis identified age, mechanism and ISS as factors associated with survival. CONCLUSION: Retrospective evaluation of our trauma population failed to show a difference in outcome between male and female trauma patients. Age, mechanism and severity of injury-but not gender-were identified as factors influencing survival.

Impact of the number of negative nodes on disease-free survival in colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Between 1995 and 1999, we observed an increasing number of nodes being recovered from colorectal specimens. Patients with colorectal cancer were studied to determine whether increasing the number of negative nodes recovered would better stage the patient and more accurately predict disease-free survival. METHODS: All patients undergoing colorectal resection with curative intent between 1995 and 1999 at a tertiary referral hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor stage, grade, number of nodes recovered, and the association of these factors with disease-free survival was analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-five patients with M0 disease undergoing surgical resection of carcinoma of the colon or rectum were studied. There was no statistically significant difference in tumor stage or grade during the study period. A statistically significant increase in the mean number of nodes recovered was observed during the study period. Node-positive patients did substantially worse than node-negative individuals. When compared with a national cancer registry (OncoPool), we observed a significantly greater number of nodes sampled in our study population and a statistically significant improved disease-free survival between our node-negative patients and that of the national cancer registry population. CONCLUSION: The extent of the pathologic assessment of the nodal status of colorectal cancer patients as determined by the number of nodes examined affects disease-free survival. The need for quality control for uniform pathologic assessments is critical.