Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Neuromodulation ; 23(1): 3-9, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31965667

ABSTRACT

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ensures that patients in the United States have access to safe and effective medical devices. The division of neurological and physical medicine devices reviews medical technologies that interface with the nervous system, including many neuromodulation devices. This article focuses on neuromodulation devices and addresses how to navigate the FDA's regulatory landscape to successfully bring devices to patients.


Subject(s)
Device Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Device Approval/standards , Implantable Neurostimulators/standards , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/standards , Humans , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/instrumentation , United States
2.
Neuron ; 92(5): 943-948, 2016 Dec 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27930909

ABSTRACT

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ensures that patients in the U.S. have access to safe and effective medical devices. The Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices reviews medical technologies that interface with the nervous system. This article addresses how to navigate the FDA's regulatory landscape to successfully bring medical devices to patients.


Subject(s)
Device Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Equipment and Supplies , Health Services Accessibility , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Dysphonia , Humans , Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine , United States
3.
Clin Transl Sci ; 7(1): 52-9, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24528900

ABSTRACT

Our research group recently demonstrated that a person with tetraplegia could use a brain-computer interface (BCI) to control a sophisticated anthropomorphic robotic arm with skill and speed approaching that of an able-bodied person. This multiyear study exemplifies important principles in translating research from foundational theory and animal experiments into a clinical study. We present a roadmap that may serve as an example for other areas of clinical device research as well as an update on study results. Prior to conducting a multiyear clinical trial, years of animal research preceded BCI testing in an epilepsy monitoring unit, and then in a short-term (28 days) clinical investigation. Scientists and engineers developed the necessary robotic and surgical hardware, software environment, data analysis techniques, and training paradigms. Coordination among researchers, funding institutes, and regulatory bodies ensured that the study would provide valuable scientific information in a safe environment for the study participant. Finally, clinicians from neurosurgery, anesthesiology, physiatry, psychology, and occupational therapy all worked in a multidisciplinary team along with the other researchers to conduct a multiyear BCI clinical study. This teamwork and coordination can be used as a model for others attempting to translate basic science into real-world clinical situations.


Subject(s)
Artificial Limbs , Brain-Computer Interfaces , Adult , Animals , Artificial Limbs/statistics & numerical data , Brain-Computer Interfaces/statistics & numerical data , Cooperative Behavior , Electroencephalography , Humans , Male , Models, Animal , Primates , Prosthesis Design , Quadriplegia/rehabilitation , Robotics/instrumentation , Robotics/statistics & numerical data , Software , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Translational Research, Biomedical , User-Computer Interface
4.
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng ; 15(3): 421-4, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17894274

ABSTRACT

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is charged with assuring the safety and effectiveness of a variety of medical products and the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health is responsible for premarket and postmarket regulation of medical devices. In this paper, we review--from device classification and clinical studies to the final marketing application--FDA's premarket requirements and postmarket requirements as they relate to deep brain stimulation devices.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Deep Brain Stimulation/standards , Device Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Guidelines as Topic , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing/standards , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Device Approval/standards , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/standards
5.
Neurology ; 63(7): 1163-7, 2004 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15477532

ABSTRACT

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved several applications for the marketing of neurologic devices. Nineteen high risk Class III medical devices were approved for the central and peripheral nervous system for marketing between 1994 and 2003, and almost half (n = 8) include indications for use in children as well as adults. On July 24, 2003, the FDA Center for Devices and Radiologic Health released for public comment a draft guidance document entitled "Premarket Assessment of Pediatric Medical Devices," which included in its objectives, the types of information needed to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of medical devices intended for use in children. The draft guidance document is also relevant to the types of information needed to promote the safe and effective development of neurologic devices. We review risk assessment and ways to reduce risk for neurologic devices intended for use in children. We also discuss the deep brain stimulator, the cochlear implant, and the CSF shunt, and considerations for minimizing risks associated with brain development, physical growth, surgery, and human factors.


Subject(s)
Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Adolescent , Brain/growth & development , Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Device Approval , Humans , Infant , Risk Management , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...