Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Pediatr Urol ; 19(2): 192.e1-192.e8, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36585277

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Initial management of pediatric patients with neurogenic bladder is focused on clean intermittent catheterization and medical therapies. Those with more hostile or small capacity bladders require surgical intervention including bladder augmentation that can result in significant clinical sequelae. This study examines a rarely described approach wherein the bladder reconstruction is extraperitonealized by bringing bowel segments through a peritoneal window and then closed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if the rate of bladder rupture and subsequent morbidity differed between patients who have undergone an intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal bladder augmentation. We hypothesized that an extraperitoneal approach reduced the risk of intraperitoneal bladder perforation, downstream Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, small bowel obstruction (SBO) requiring exploratory laparotomy, and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt-related difficulties as compared to the standard intraperitoneal technique. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to assess surgical approach and outcomes in patients who underwent bladder augmentation performed between January 2009 and June 2021. Patients were identified through an existing database and manual chart review was conducted to extract data through imaging studies, operative notes, and clinical documentation. The primary outcome was bladder perforation. Secondary outcomes were ICU admission, exploratory laparotomy, and VP shunt externalization, infection, or revision for any cause. Nonparametric statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients underwent bladder augmentation with 37 intraperitoneal and 74 extraperitoneal procedures. Median follow up was 5.8 years [IQR 3.0-8.6 years] and did not vary between groups (P = 0.67). Only one patient was found to have a bladder perforation in the intraperitoneal group (log-rank P = 0.154). There were no significant differences in time to post-augmentation ICU admission, exploratory laparotomy, or VP shunt events between the two groups (log-rank P = 0.294, log-rank P = 0.832, and log-rank P = 0.237, respectively). Furthermore, a Kaplan-Meier analysis assessing time to composite complication demonstrated no significant difference between the two techniques (log-rank P = 0.236). DISCUSSION: This study provides important data comparing the rate of bladder perforation and subsequent morbidity between intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal bladder augmentation. As expected, with a complex procedure, both groups suffered complications, but these data showed no difference between the two procedures. Rates of prior (abdominal) surgery may influence the decision to perform this procedure extraperitoneal. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes related to bladder perforation and secondary consequences do not differ significantly between patients who had bladder augmentation performed with an intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach. Given the low number of adverse events in this study, larger studies are warranted.


Subject(s)
Urinary Bladder Diseases , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic , Humans , Child , Urinary Bladder/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Bladder Diseases/etiology , Urinary Bladder Diseases/surgery , Urologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/etiology , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/surgery
2.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 48(1): 29-36, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36167478

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Regional techniques are a key component of multimodal analgesia and help decrease opioid use perioperatively, but some techniques may not be suitable for all patients, such as those with spina bifida. We hypothesized peripheral regional catheters would reduce postoperative opioid use compared with no regional analgesia without increasing pain scores in pediatric patients with spina bifida undergoing major urological surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of a multicenter database established for the study of enhanced recovery after surgery was performed of patients from 2009 to 2021 who underwent bladder augmentation or creation of catheterizable channels. Patients without spina bifida and those receiving epidural analgesia were excluded. Opioids were converted into morphine equivalents and normalized to patient weight. RESULTS: 158 patients with pediatric spina bifida from 7 centers were included, including 87 with and 71 without regional catheters. There were no differences in baseline patient factors. Anesthesia setup increased from median 40 min (IQR 34-51) for no regional to 64 min (IQR 40-97) for regional catheters (p<0.01). The regional catheter group had lower median intraoperative opioid usage (0.24 vs 0.80 mg/kg morphine equivalents, p<0.01) as well as lower in-hospital postoperative opioid usage (0.05 vs 0.23 mg/kg/day morphine equivalents, p<0.01). Pain scores were not higher in the regional catheters group. DISCUSSION: Continuous regional analgesia following major urological surgery in children with spina bifida was associated with a 70% intraoperative and 78% postoperative reduction in opioids without higher pain scores. This approach should be considered for similar surgical interventions in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03245242.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Spinal Dysraphism , Child , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid , Morphine , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Dysraphism/diagnosis , Spinal Dysraphism/surgery , Spinal Dysraphism/complications
3.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 37(1): 151-159, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33161476

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a perioperative management strategy to hasten postoperative recovery. We examined the effects of a pilot implementation of ERAS for pediatric patients on anesthetic outcomes. METHODS: We performed a prospective case-control study utilizing an ERAS protocol in patients aged < 18 years undergoing urologic reconstruction that included a bowel anastomosis. Protocol elements included: multimodal analgesia, opioid minimization, and routine nausea/vomiting prophylaxis. ERAS patients were propensity-matched with historical controls. Outcomes of interest included maximum PACU pain score, time to first opioid, opioid-free days, and need for opioids on day of discharge. RESULTS: A total of 13 ERAS patients and 26 historical controls were included, with median ages 9.9 years (IQR 9.1-11) and 10.4 years (IQR 8.0-12.4), respectively. ERAS increased the percentage of patients who did not receive any intraoperative or postoperative opioids (0% vs 15%, p = 0.046 for both) and reduced maximum PACU pain score (3 vs 0, p < 0.001). The use of postoperative supplemental oxygen was decreased in the ERAS group (85% vs 38%, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an ERAS protocol appears to decrease postoperative pain, opioid usage, and positively impact other anesthetic outcomes in children undergoing urologic reconstructive surgery utilizing a bowel anastomosis.


Subject(s)
Analgesia/methods , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Case-Control Studies , Child , Female , Humans , Intestines/surgery , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Prospective Studies
4.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 19(3): 217-222.e1, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33069585

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis from prostate cancer (PCA) is a rare event, but one with significant prognostic impact for those affected. There are limited data on its impact in contemporary cohorts treated with modern agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective institutional review was performed to characterize the occurrence/outcome of PCA CNS metastasis on all cases of PCA from 2011 to 2017. A manual chart review was performed to confirm PCA CNS metastases in all cases identified through a diagnostic code screening of the health data. RESULTS: A total of 6596 cases of PCA were identified, with 29 (20 dural and 9 intraparenchymal) confirmed cases of CNS metastases from PCA. The median survival from the time of diagnosis of CNS metastasis was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval, 2.04-10.78 months) and 5.41 months (95% confidence interval, 3.03 months to not reached) for dural and parenchymal metastases, respectively. Among those who developed CNS metastases, approximately 79% of patients had prior exposure to abiraterone and/or enzalutamide, of whom 50% had ≥ 6 months of exposure. Four (0.07%) of the 5841 patients developed CNS metastases prior to the initiation of therapy or on androgen deprivation therapy alone. In contrast, 24 (8.6%) of the 279 patients with 2 or more lines of medical therapy developed CNS metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis highlights the continued poor prognosis of parenchymal and dural CNS metastases from PCA. CNS metastases in PCA remain a rare event with a 0.4% incidence in this series, but this incidence is considerably increased in patients who receive medical therapy beyond first-line androgen deprivation therapy.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Prostatic Neoplasms , Central Nervous System , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prognosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies
5.
Arthrosc Tech ; 6(3): e585-e589, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28706803

ABSTRACT

Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remains one of the most commonly performed procedures in orthopaedic surgery. We describe a technique to visualize the button being advanced through the femoral tunnel using an arthroscope placed in the anteromedial portal. Looking into the femoral tunnel in line with the sutures, this technique allows the surgeon to directly visualize the femoral button as it traverses the femoral tunnel and confirms that it is engaged over the femoral cortex. Certain complications can arise, however, with the use of a suspensory fixation with a button on the femoral cortex. This method can decrease operative time and complication rates.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...