A descriptive analysis of postmarketing requirement studies and clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Under the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA), the FDA has the authority to require applicants to conduct postmarketing studies or clinical trials. These postmarketing requirements (PMRs) provide additional data on the safety of the drug product. The purpose of the study was to conduct a descriptive analysis of FDAAA PMRs and the resulting regulatory actions. METHODS: This study evaluated FDAAA PMRs established between 2013 and 2019. We used the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) to map preferred terms (PTs) for serious risks associated with the PMRs. Relevant documents available in the FDA's document archiving, reporting, and regulatory tracking system (DARRTS), including but not limited to internal letters and reviews, documents submitted by applicants, and publicly available data sources were assessed for data collection of study elements. RESULTS: Of the 1079 new FDAAA PMRs established between January 01, 2013, and December 31, 2019, 82% (n = 884) were associated with new drug applications (NDAs) and 18% (n = 195) with biologic license applications (BLAs). Most PMRs were established at the time of drug approval (73%, n = 789) compared to post-approval (27%, n = 290). The majority of PMRs had an open status (59%, n = 639) and 41% (n = 440) were closed. The median time from the PMR establishment date to submission of the results to the FDA was 690 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 748 days) for 167 completed clinical trials and 483 days (IQR: 603 days) for 241 completed studies. Approximately 53% (180/339) of fulfilled FDAAA PMRs resulted in labeling changes. CONCLUSIONS: FDAAA PMRs are useful in informing postmarket safety of drugs. Most FDAAA PMRs were established at the time of drug approval, reflecting safety signals identified during the review of the marketing application, and over half of fulfilled FDAAA PMRs resulted in regulatory action.

Information Visualization Platform for Postmarket Surveillance Decision Support.

INTRODUCTION: The US FDA receives more than 2 million postmarket reports each year. Safety Evaluators (SEs) review these reports, as well as external information, to identify potential safety signals. With the increasing number of reports and the size of external information, more efficient solutions for data integration and decision making are needed. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop an interactive decision support application for drug safety surveillance that integrates and visualizes information from postmarket reports, product labels, and biomedical literature. METHODS: We conducted multiple meetings with a group of seven SEs at the FDA to collect the requirements for the Information Visualization Platform (InfoViP). Using infographic design principles, we implemented the InfoViP prototype version as a modern web application using the integrated information collected from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, the DailyMed repository, and PubMed. The same group of SEs evaluated the InfoViP prototype functionalities using a simple evaluation form and provided input for potential enhancements. RESULTS: The SEs described their workflows and overall expectations around the automation of time-consuming tasks, including the access to the visualization of external information. We developed a set of wireframes, shared them with the SEs, and finalized the InfoViP design. The InfoViP prototype architecture relied on a javascript and a python-based framework, as well as an existing tool for the processing of free-text information in all sources. This natural language processing tool supported multiple functionalities, especially the construction of time plots for individual postmarket reports and groups of reports. Overall, we received positive comments from the SEs during the InfoViP prototype evaluation and addressed their suggestions in the final version. CONCLUSIONS: The InfoViP system uses context-driven interactive visualizations and informatics tools to assist FDA SEs in synthesizing data from multiple sources for their case series analyses.

Nucleoside analogues and mitochondrial toxicity.

An evaluation of the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System identified that patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and chronic hepatitis C virus who were treated with a regimen of ribavirin and didanosine, with or without stavudine, were at increased risk for events associated with mitochondrial toxicity, including fatal hepatic failure, peripheral neuropathy, pancreatitis, and symptomatic hyperlactatemia/lactic acidosis. In response, the US product labels for didanosine and ribavirin have been revised to caution clinicians against coadministration of these drugs.

Increased US prescription trends associated with the CDC Bacillus anthracis antimicrobial postexposure prophylaxis campaign.

PURPOSE: We evaluated national outpatient antimicrobial prescription trends in relation to the first United States case of inhalational anthrax due to the intentional delivery of Bacillus anthracis (B. anthracis) spores. METHODS: We queried IMS HEALTH's National Prescription Audit Plus7 database for two 6-month periods (July-December) in 2001 and 2000 to describe outpatient prescription trends of antimicrobials recommended during the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) postexposure prophylaxis campaign. RESULTS: Overall, antimicrobial utilization for the referent 6-month time frame was greater in 2000 compared to 2001. In contrast, ciprofloxacin utilization was greater in 2001 during October, the month following the index case, increasing by more than 40% over utilization in October 2000. Similarly, doxycycline utilization increased by 30% during October/November. This corresponded to relative increases in US utilization for ciprofloxacin of approximately 160,000 prescriptions for the month of October and for doxycycline of approximately 96,000 prescriptions during October and 120,000 prescriptions for November. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude more widespread prescribing of ciprofloxacin and doxycycline occurred in response to the first US bioterrorist-associated anthrax attacks than was warranted based upon confirmed or suspected B. anthracis exposure alone.