ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Appropriate management of acute postoperative pain is critical for patient care and practice management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether postoperative pain score correlates with injury severity in tibial plateau fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was completed at a single academic level one trauma center. All adult patients treated operatively for tibial plateau fractures who did not have concomitant injuries, previous injury to the ipsilateral tibia or knee joint, compartment syndrome, inadequate follow-up, or perioperative regional anesthesia were included (n = 88). The patients were split into groups based on the AO/OTA fracture classification (B-type vs C-type), energy mechanism, number of surgical approaches, need for temporizing external fixation, and operative time as a proxy for injury severity. The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (average in the first 24 h, highest in the first 24 h, two- and six-week postoperative appointments). Psychosocial and comorbid factors that may affect pain were studied and controlled for (history of diabetes, neuropathy, anxiety, depression, PTSD, and previous opioid prescription). Additionally, opioid use in the postoperative period was studied and controlled for (morphine milligram equivalents (MME) administered in the first 24 h, discharge MME/day, total discharge MME, and opioid refills). RESULTS: VAS scores were similar between groups at each time point except the two-week postoperative time point. At the two-week postoperative time point, the absolute difference between the groups was 1.3. The groups were significantly different in several injury and surgical variables as expected, but were similar in all demographic, comorbid, and postoperative opioid factors. CONCLUSIONS: There was no clinical difference in postoperative pain between AO/OTA 41B and 41C tibial plateau fractures. This supports the idea of providers uncoupling nociception and pain in postoperative patients. Providers should consider minimizing extended opioid use, even in more severe injuries.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the prevalence of dysphagia, as well as mortality associated with dysphagia in the elderly population receiving surgical treatment for a hip fracture. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was completed at an academic level 1 tertiary care center. Patients older than or equal to 65 admitted with a hip fracture diagnosis from January 2015 to December 2020 (n = 617) were included. The main outcome was the prevalence of dysphagia and association with mortality. Secondary analysis included timing of dysphagia and contributions to mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of patients had dysphagia, and the mortality rates were higher in patients with dysphagia (8.9%) versus those without dysphagia (2.6%), chi-square p = 0.001, and odds ratio 3.69 (CI 1.6-8.5). Mortality rates in patients with acute dysphagia were also higher (12.4%) than those with chronic dysphagia (5%) and chi-squared p = 0.02. Mortality rates in patients with a perioperative dysphagic event (13.9%) were higher than those with non-perioperative dysphagia (4%) and chi-squared p = 0.001. Mortality rates in patients who had acute perioperative dysphagia (21.2%) were higher than those with chronic dysphagia that presented perioperatively (6.8%) and chi-squared p = 0.006. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates high rates of dysphagia in the elderly hip fracture population and a significant association between dysphagia and mortality. Timing and chronicity of dysphagia were relevant, as patients with acute perioperative dysphagia had the highest mortality rate. Unlike other identified risk factors, dysphagia may be at least partially modifiable. More research is needed to determine whether formal evaluation and treatment of dysphagia lowers mortality risk.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) can be difficult to diagnose and are often marginalized when compared to more obvious physical injuries. Despite this, recognition and early treatment can lead to improved outcomes. Even mild TBIs have the potential to cause significant long-term consequences for patients, which may affect their physical recovery from orthopaedic injuries. The objective of this study was to examine the incidence and treatment of TBI within the orthopaedic trauma population. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were all patients presenting after an acute trauma with an orthopaedic surgery consult over a continuous 3 month timeframe (n = 187). A retrospective review was completed at an academic tertiary referral trauma center. The primary outcome was the rate of TBI. Secondary outcomes included rate of TBI listed as a discharge diagnosis and rate of follow up plan. Several secondary variables were noted and their associations with TBI evaluated. RESULTS: 27 % of the 187 patients had an acute TBI. 61 % of TBI patients had the diagnosis listed in their discharge summary. 6 % had a follow up plan. The positive TBI group was associated with more high energy injuries (p = 0.032), average limbs involved (p = 0.007), upper extremity injury (p < 0.001), bilateral lower extremity injury (p = 0.004), and Injury Severity Score (p < 0.001). 82 % of patients with an acute TBI had an occupational therapy consult and 39 % had a neurosurgery consult. 24 % of patients with a TBI were admitted to the orthopaedic primary service. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting after an acute trauma with orthopaedic injuries have high rates of TBI, but low rates of diagnosis and treatment. This lack of diagnosis and treatment can negatively impact recovery from orthopaedic injuries. Orthopaedic providers should be aware of the diagnostic criteria and initial treatment steps for TBI to ensure prompt and effective treatment, which has been shown to improve outcomes.
