Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Cancer Educ ; 34(4): 749-754, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29675654

ABSTRACT

Patient educators come into the field from diverse professional backgrounds and often lack training in how to teach and develop patient education resources since no formal patient education professional certification program exists. A professional certification program for patient educators would further define the professional scope of practice and reduce variability in performance. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the level of interest among Canadian cancer patient educators in a patient education professional certification program and (2) determine the competencies to be included in the professional certification program. A 12-item survey was designed by executive members of the Canadian Chapter of the Cancer Patient Education Network. The survey included a list of competencies associated with patient education, and a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "slightly important" to "very important" was used to determine the rank of each competency. The survey was sent to 53 patient educators across Canada. Ninety-two percent of the patient educators are interested in a professional certification program. Patient educators indicated that competencies related to developing patient resources, collaboration, plain language expertise, and health literacy were of most importance. Patient educators support the development of a patient education professional certification program and endorsed the competencies proposed. This information provides the foundation for the creation of a professional certification program for cancer patient educators.


Subject(s)
Certification/methods , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Professional Competence/standards , Program Development/standards , Canada , Humans , Patient Education as Topic/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 25(4): 1323-1355, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28058570

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This systematic review was intended to identify the effectiveness and inclusion of essential components of self-management education interventions to support patients with cancer in developing the skills needed for effective self-management of their disease and the acute or immediate, long-term, and late harmful effects of treatments. METHODS: Self-management education interventions were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) containing at least one of the eight core elements outlined by the research team. A systematic search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE (2005 through April 2015), Embase (2005 to 2015, week 15), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 4, April 2015), CINAHL (2005 to 2015) and PsychINFO (2005 to 2015). Keywords searched include 'self-management patient education' or 'patient education'. RESULTS: Forty-two RCTs examining self-management education interventions for patients with cancer were identified. Heterogeneity of interventions precluded meta-analysis, but narrative qualitative synthesis suggested that self-management education interventions improve symptoms of fatigue, pain, depression, anxiety, emotional distress and quality of life. Results for specific combinations of core elements were inconclusive. Very few studies used the same combinations of core elements, and among those that did, results were conflicting. Thus, conclusions as to the components or elements of self-management education interventions associated with the strength of the effects could not be assessed by this review. CONCLUSION: Defining the core components of cancer self-management education and the fundamental elements for inclusion in supporting effective self-management will be critical to ensure consistent and effective provision of self-management support in the cancer system.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Quality of Life/psychology , Self Care/methods , Humans
3.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci ; 47(4): 309-314, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31047255

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the understanding and practice of person-centred care by health care professionals and support staff at a cancer centre and to learn how patients and family members understand and experience person-centred care. METHODS: The study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 used large wall mounted posters and marking pens in public areas of the cancer centre to gather comments from staff, volunteers, students, patients, family members, and visitors to answer the question, "What does person-centred care mean to you?" Phase 2 used a six-question, open-ended, paper-based questionnaire for staff and patients. A manual coding technique was used to derive themes from both posters and questionnaires. RESULTS: We derived 97 themes from the posters and 134 themes from 44 returned questionnaires (survey response rate of 37%). When the themes were combined and reprioritized, we learned that person-centred care is: (1) care that is caring, compassionate, and empathetic; (2) person or patient is the centre of focus; (3) care is unique to the individual's needs; and (4) person or patient is a part of their care. Furthermore, all staff should provide person-centred care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings describe what our staff, patients, and family members believe person-centred care is, and how it should be delivered. Based on this research study, we recommend promoting additional dialogue and continuing education opportunities for health care professionals and other front-line staff who will assist them to complete the statement, "I demonstrate person-centred care by…" to their own satisfaction in the future.

4.
J Cancer Educ ; 26(1): 12-21, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21161465

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine effective teaching strategies and methods of delivery for patient education (PE). A systematic review was conducted and reviews with or without meta-analyses, which examined teaching strategies and methods of delivery for PE, were included. Teaching strategies identified are traditional lectures, discussions, simulated games, computer technology, written material, audiovisual sources, verbal recall, demonstration, and role playing. Methods of delivery focused on how to deliver the teaching strategies. Teaching strategies that increased knowledge, decreased anxiety, and increased satisfaction included computer technology, audio and videotapes, written materials, and demonstrations. Various teaching strategies used in combination were similarly successful. Moreover, structured-, culturally appropriate- and patient-specific teachings were found to be better than ad hoc teaching or generalized teaching. Findings provide guidance for establishing provincial standards for the delivery of PE. Recommendations concerning the efficacy of the teaching strategies and delivery methods are provided.


Subject(s)
Patient Education as Topic/methods , Teaching/methods , Communication , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic
5.
J Cancer Educ ; 25(1): 43-8, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20094826

ABSTRACT

On their first visit to the Regional Cancer Program, all patients are provided with the "Information for Patients and Families" binder that was designed by an interdisciplinary cancer patient education team. Patients were asked to complete a survey to evaluate the usefulness of this binder. Timely delivery of the "Information for Patients and Families" binder validates a higher level of satisfaction with oncology services because patients are better informed and this translates into a reduction of psychosocial problems. As a result of this study, a decision was made to provide the binder earlier in the patient's journey (e.g., post surgery for thoracic and brain tumor patients).


Subject(s)
Health Education/methods , Neoplasms , Patient Satisfaction , Consumer Health Information/methods , Humans , Patient Education as Topic/methods
6.
RN ; 72(2): 12, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19288598
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...