Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Eur J Public Health ; 27(5): 808-813, 2017 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28957476

ABSTRACT

Background: Cancer survival in the UK and Denmark are lower when compared with similar countries with late diagnosis a possible cause. We aimed to study the relationship between barriers to attending a primary care physician (GP) and anticipated time to help seeking (ATHS) with four cancer symptoms in six countries. Methods: A population-based survey measuring cancer awareness and beliefs conducted within the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and UK. Data were collected on perceived barriers to GP consultation (including embarrassment, worry about wasting the doctors' time, fear about what the doctor might find and being too busy) and ATHS for persistent cough, abdominal swelling, rectal bleeding and breast changes. Relationships between perceived barriers and ATHS were investigated using multivariable analysis. Results: Among 19 079 respondents, higher perceived barrier scores were associated with longer ATHS intervals for all symptoms studied (P < 0.01) responders with the highest barrier scores (>10.84) had between two and three times the odds of longer ATHS. ATHS was low in Australia for all symptoms and highest in Denmark for abdominal bloating. Conclusions: Perceived barriers to help-seeking have a role in delaying GP presentation. Early diagnosis campaigns should address emotional and practical barriers that reduce early presentation with potential cancer symptoms.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Australia , Canada , Denmark , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway , Sweden , Time Factors , United Kingdom
2.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry ; 58(5): 586-594, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27786359

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although music therapy (MT) is considered an effective intervention for young people with mental health needs, its efficacy in clinical settings is unclear. We therefore examined the efficacy of MT in clinical practice. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-one child (8-16 years, with social, emotional, behavioural and developmental difficulties) and parent dyads from six Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service community care facilities in Northern Ireland were randomised to 12 weekly sessions of MT plus usual care [n = 123; 76 in final analyses] or usual care alone [n = 128; 105 in final analyses]. Follow-up occurred at 13 weeks and 26 weeks postrandomisation. Primary outcome was improvement in communication (Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scales) (SSIS) at 13 weeks. Secondary outcomes included social functioning, self-esteem, depression and family functioning. RESULTS: There was no significant difference for the child SSIS at week 13 (adjusted difference in mean 2.4; 95% CI -1.2 to 6.1; p = .19) or for the guardian SSIS (0.5; 95% CI -2.9 to 3.8; p = .78). However, for participants aged 13 and over in the intervention group, the child SSIS communication was significantly improved (6.1, 95% CI 1.6 to 10.5; p = .007) but not the guardian SSIS (1.1; 95% CI -2.9 to 5.2; p = .59). Overall, self-esteem was significantly improved and depression scores were significantly lower at week 13. There was no significant difference in family or social functioning at week 13. CONCLUSIONS: While the findings provide some evidence for the integration of music therapy into clinical practice, differences relating to subgroups and secondary outcomes indicate the need for further study. ISRCTN Register; ISRCTN96352204.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Autism Spectrum Disorder/therapy , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Music Therapy/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Self Concept , Social Skills , Adolescent , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Single-Blind Method
3.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 99(5): F359-65, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24812103

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Examine the behavioural outcomes at age 3 years of late preterm infants (LPIs) who were admitted to neonatal intensive care (NIC) in comparison with LPIs who were not admitted. METHOD: This cohort study prospectively recruited 225 children born late preterm (34-36(+6) weeks gestation) in 2006 in Northern Ireland, now aged 3 years. Two groups were compared: LPIs who received NIC (study; n=103) and LPIs who did not receive NIC (control; n=122). Parents/guardians completed the Child Behaviour Checklist/1½-5. Descriptive maternal and infant data were also collected. RESULTS: As expected LPI children admitted to NIC had higher medical risk than the non-admitted comparison group (increased caesarean section, born at earlier gestation, lower birth weight and an episode of resuscitation at birth). LPIs admitted to NIC scored higher on the Child Behaviour Checklist/1½-5 compared with those who were not admitted indicating more behavioural problems; this was statistically significant for the Aggressive Behaviour Subscale (z=-2.36) and the Externalising Problems Scale (z=-2.42). The group difference on the Externalising Problems Scale was no longer significant after controlling for gender, gestational age and deprivation score. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable data on the behaviour at age 3 years of LPIs admitted to NIC compared with LPIs not admitted to NIC. Further research would be beneficial to explore medical and psychosocial explanations for observed differences between groups using large prospective cohort studies.


Subject(s)
Child Behavior Disorders/etiology , Infant, Premature, Diseases/psychology , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Birth Weight , Case-Control Studies , Child Behavior Disorders/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Infant, Premature, Diseases/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Northern Ireland/epidemiology , Poverty , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Psychometrics , Risk Factors , Sex Factors
4.
Early Hum Dev ; 90(4): 201-5, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24485967

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Late preterm infants (LPIs), born at 34+0 to 36+6 weeks of gestation contribute a significant proportion of all neonatal intensive care (NIC) admissions and are regarded as being at risk of adverse outcomes compared to term-born infants. AIM: To explore the health outcomes and family functioning of LPIs who required neonatal intensive care, at three years of age. STUDY DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: This cohort study included 225 children born late preterm, between 1 January and 31 December 2006 in Northern Ireland. Children admitted for NIC (study group, n=103) were compared with children who did not require NIC or who required special care only for up to three days (comparison group, n=122). OUTCOME MEASURES: Health outcomes were measured using the Health Status Questionnaire, health service usage by parent report and family functioning using the PedsQL™ Family Impact Module. RESULTS: LPIs who required NIC revealed similar health outcomes at three years in comparison to those who did not. Despite this, more parents of LPIs who required NIC reported visiting their GP and medical specialists during their child's third year of life. Differences in family functioning were also observed with mothers of LPIs who required NIC reporting, significantly lower levels of social and physical functioning, increased difficulties with communication and increased levels of worry. CONCLUSIONS: LPIs were observed to have similar health outcomes at three years of age regardless of NIC requirement. The increase in GP and medical specialist visits and family functioning difficulties observed among those infants who required NIC merits further investigation.


Subject(s)
Family/psychology , Health Status Indicators , Infant, Premature/growth & development , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature/psychology , Male , Self Report
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...