Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Br J Surg ; 111(1)2024 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38055888

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The necessity of performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with clinically and radiologically node-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been questioned. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of nodal positivity in these patients and to identify clinicopathological features associated with lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ypN+). METHODS: A retrospective multicentre study was performed. Patients with cT1-3 cN0 breast cancer who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2016 and 2021 were included. Negative nodal status was defined as the absence of palpable lymph nodes, and the absence of suspicious nodes on axillary ultrasonography, or the absence of tumour cells on axillary nodal fine needle aspiration or core biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 371 patients were analysed. Overall, 47 patients (12.7%) had a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Nodal positivity was identified in 22 patients (29.0%) with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- tumours, 12 patients (13.8%) with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, 3 patients (5.6%) with hormone receptor-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, and 10 patients (6.5%) with triple-negative breast cancer. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that multicentric disease was associated with a higher likelihood of ypN+ (OR 2.66, 95% c.i. 1.18 to 6.01; P = 0.018), whilst a radiological complete response in the breast was associated with a reduced likelihood of ypN+ (OR 0.10, 95% c.i. 0.02 to 0.42; P = 0.002), regardless of molecular subtype. Only 3% of patients who had a radiological complete response in the breast were ypN+. The majority of patients (85%) with a positive sentinel node proceeded to axillary lymph node dissection and 93% had N1 disease. CONCLUSION: The rate of sentinel lymph node positivity in patients who achieve a radiological complete response in the breast is exceptionally low for all molecular subtypes.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Lymph Node Excision , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Hormones/therapeutic use , Axilla/pathology , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology
2.
Fam Cancer ; 22(2): 135-149, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36029389

ABSTRACT

In the Republic of Ireland (ROI), BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing has been traditionally undertaken in eligible individuals, after pre-test counselling by a Clinical Geneticist/Genetic Counsellor. Clinical Genetics services in ROI are poorly resourced, with routine waiting times for appointments at the time of this pilot often extending beyond a year. The consequent prolonged waiting times are unacceptable where therapeutic decision-making depends on the patient's BRCA status. "Mainstreaming" BRCA1/BRCA2 testing through routine oncology/surgical clinics has been implemented successfully in other centres in the UK and internationally. We aimed to pilot this pathway in three Irish tertiary centres. A service evaluation project was undertaken over a 6-month period between January and July 2017. Eligible patients, fulfilling pathology and age-based inclusion criteria defined by TGL clinical, were identified, and offered constitutional BRCA1/BRCA2 testing after pre-test counselling by treating clinicians. Tests were undertaken by TGL Clinical. Results were returned to clinicians by secure email. Onward referrals of patients with uncertain/pathogenic results, or suspicious family histories, to Clinical Genetics were made by the treating team. Surveys assessing patient and clinician satisfaction were sent to participating clinicians and a sample of participating patients. Data was collected with respect to diagnostic yield, turnaround time, onward referral rates, and patient and clinician feedback. A total of 101  patients underwent diagnostic germline BRCA1/BRCA2 tests through this pathway. Pathogenic variants were identified in 12 patients (12%). All patients in whom variants were identified were appropriately referred to Clinical Genetics. At least 12 additional patients with uninformative BRCA1/BRCA2 tests were also referred for formal assessment by Clinical Geneticist or Genetic Counsellor. Issues were noted in terms of time pressures and communication of results to patients. Results from a representative sample of participants completing the satisfaction survey indicated that the pathway was acceptable to patients and clinicians. Mainstreaming of constitutional BRCA1/BRCA2 testing guided by age- and pathology-based criteria is potentially feasible for patients with breast cancer as well as patients with ovarian cancer in Ireland.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Genetic Testing , Pilot Projects , Ireland , Feasibility Studies , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Germ-Line Mutation
3.
Breast Cancer ; 28(1): 168-174, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32780320

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast fibromatosis is a rare clinical entity, but poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In light of recent changes in management practices, the aim was to review our institutional experience of breast fibromatosis and provide a review of current available literature on such management. METHODS: A search of pathological databases within two tertiary institutions for all patients diagnosed with fibromatosis of the breast over a 10-year period (2007-2016) was performed. Clinicopathological characteristics and modes of treatment were recorded for each patient. Concurrently a comprehensive literature search was performed and studies relating to breast fibromatosis and its management were identified and reviewed. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 42 (range 21-70) and all patients were diagnosed with core biopsy. The most useful imaging modality in diagnosis was ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. 13/16 were treated surgically whilst 3/16 were treated using a watch-and-wait approach. 6/13 (46%) required re-excision of margins and 2/13 (15%) had recurrence after surgery. On review of the literature, there is no dedicated guideline in place for the management of breast fibromatosis. Currently a 'watch and wait' approach is favoured over surgical intervention due to high levels of recurrence and associated surgical morbidity. All cases should be discussed at a sarcoma multidisciplinary team meeting and tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be considered in advanced cases. CONCLUSIONS: Breast fibromatosis is rare but affects young patients. Active surveillance is now favoured over surgical resection due to high recurrence rates and extensive morbidity. Dedicated guidelines are required to ensure best outcomes.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Fibroma/therapy , Mastectomy/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Watchful Waiting/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Breast/pathology , Breast/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Fibroma/diagnosis , Fibroma/epidemiology , Fibroma/pathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Mastectomy/standards , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography, Mammary , Watchful Waiting/standards , Young Adult
4.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(5): 861-868, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32613608

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer patients respond differently to neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) based on receptor subtype. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of progesterone receptor (PgR) status on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in estrogen receptor (ER)+, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)- breast cancer patients. METHODS: ER+ and HER- patients receiving NAC over a 7-year period (2011-2017) were identified. The primary outcome was breast complete pathological response (pCR) rate. Secondary outcomes included axillary pCR, axillary/breast pCR and complete radiological response (cRR). RESULTS: A total of 203 patients were identified (149 in the ER+, PgR+, and HER- group and 54 in the ER+, PgR-, and HER- group). Compared with the PgR+ group, PgR- patients were significantly associated with breast pCR (31.5% vs 7.4%; χ² test; P < .01). In multivariable analysis, PgR- status (odds ratio [OR], 4.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.58,13.28; P = .005), radiological size >50 mm (OR, 5.38; 95% CI: 1.07,27.04; P = .04) and grade (OR, 3.52;95% CI: 1.21,10.23;P = .02) were significant predictors of breast pCR. Only PgR- status was a significant predictor of cRR (OR, 6.234; 95% CI: 2.531, 15.355; P < .001). In node positive patients, PgR negativity was associated with a trend towards breast/axillary nodal pCR (22% vs 12.7%; χ² test; P = .055). CONCLUSION: Over 30% of ER+, PgR-, and HER- patients will have a breast pCR after NAC. PgR- is the only significant predictor of breast pCR/cRR in this tumor subtype. ER+, PgR-, and HER- patients should be considered for NAC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Retrospective Studies
5.
Breast ; 32: 126-129, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28178606

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the readability, accessibility and quality of information pertaining to breast reconstruction post mastectomy on the Internet in the English language. METHODS: Using the Google© search engine the keywords "Breast reconstruction post mastectomy" were searched for. We analyzed the top 75 sites. The Flesch Reading Ease Score and Gunning Fog Index were calculated to assess readability. Web site quality was assessed objectively using the University of Michigan Consumer Health Web site Evaluation Checklist. Accessibility was determined using an automated accessibility tool. In addition, the country of origin, type of organisation producing the site and presence of Health on the Net (HoN) Certification status was recorded. RESULTS: The Web sites were difficult to read and comprehend. The mean Flesch Reading Ease scores were 55.5. The mean Gunning Fog Index scores was 8.6. The mean Michigan score was 34.8 indicating weak quality of websites. Websites with HoN certification ranked higher in the search results (p = 0.007). Website quality was influenced by organisation type (p < 0.0001) with academic/healthcare, not for profit and government sites having higher Michigan scores. 20% of sites met the minimum accessibility criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Internet information on breast reconstruction post mastectomy and procedures is poorly written and we suggest that Webpages providing information must be made more readable and accessible. We suggest that health professionals should recommend Web sites that are easy to read and contain high-quality surgical information. Medical information on the Internet should be readable, accessible, reliable and of a consistent quality.


Subject(s)
Consumer Health Information/standards , Internet/standards , Mammaplasty , Mastectomy , Search Engine/standards , Adult , Breast Neoplasms , Comprehension , Female , Health Literacy , Humans , Middle Aged
6.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 69(9): 1248-53, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27406254

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcomes are increasingly being taken into account in planning health service provision. Few studies have examined how the process of care influences patients' perception of outcome. The aim of the current study was to quantify patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction and to examine the demographic, disease and process-of-care variables that contributed to satisfaction with breasts and overall outcome. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed and the BREAST-Q outcomes assessment instrument was used to evaluate patient-reported psychosocial, physical and sexual well-being, as well as satisfaction with breasts, overall outcome and process of care. To identify factors predictive of satisfaction with breasts and overall outcome, the relation between covariates and each of these scales was assessed using linear regression models. RESULTS: Sixty one patients, with a mean age of 50 years, completed the survey. Mean satisfaction with breasts was 59.6% and satisfaction with overall outcome was 73.2%. Satisfaction across health-related quality of life scales ranged from 44.6% for sexual well-being to 74.6% for physical well-being. The mean rating for psychosocial well-being was 67.9%. Satisfaction ratings for surgeon, medical staff and office staff were all over 90%. Satisfaction with plastic surgeon was predictive of satisfaction with outcome and satisfaction with breasts (P = 0.001 and 0.021 respectively). DISCUSSION: The surgeon-patient relationship significantly influences patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction. Further service development must recognize the need for additional time and personnel to deliver high standard, patient-centered care.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammaplasty/psychology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction , Physician-Patient Relations , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Breast ; 17(4): 412-7, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18486474

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A national initiative in Ireland in 2000 defined 13 designated Units to provide care for symptomatic breast cancer, and resources, including an ability to develop audit programmes, were provided. In the absence of a national audit of breast cancer outcomes, the aim of this study is to provide a detailed report of one Unit's subsequent experience, in particular comparing process and outcome data with international norms and benchmarks, and to infer on the likely impact of the national initiative. METHODS: A 5-year prospective audit of patients presenting to the Symptomatic Breast Clinic from 2001 to 2005 was conducted. All cancer diagnoses were discussed at the Breast Multidisciplinary Conference, and all clinicopathological treatment details and follow-up information were entered by a full-time data manager. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty-nine patients were diagnosed through the clinic, 18 (2%) Stage 0, 169 (20%) Stage I, 380 (45%) Stage II, 142 (17%) Stage III, and 123 (15%) Stage IV. At a median follow-up of 35 months the overall 5-year survival was 71%, with 100%, 91%, 83%, 72%, and 11% survival for Stages 0-IV, respectively, and disease-specific survival of 82%. CONCLUSIONS: The process and outcome data are consistent with international benchmarks. These data from one designated centre support the national initiatives in Ireland to restructure breast services.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Health Care Reform , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Benchmarking , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Ireland , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Survival Rate
9.
In. Buenos Aires. Instituto Provincial del Medio Ambiente. Cuencas hídricas: contaminación, evaluación de riesgo y saneamiento. Buenos Aires, IPMA, 1996. p.76-84.
Monography in Spanish | BINACIS | ID: bin-138491

ABSTRACT

Análisis de riesgo ambiental actual: Pasos técnicos 1) Identificación del receptor de la amenaza. 2) Identificación de la amenaza. 3) Identificación de puntos finales. 4) Identificación de otros receptores de riesgo. 5) Evaluación en el medio ambiente de la exposición de la amenaza y la respuesta de organismos, poblaciones, comunidades y ecosistemas. 6) Paso final. Análisis dw riesgo retrospectiva/retroactiva. Perspectivas


Subject(s)
Environmental Hazards
10.
In. Buenos Aires. Instituto del Medio Ambiente. Cuencas hídricas: contaminación, evaluación de riesgo y saneamiento. La Plata, Instituto del Medio Ambiente, 1996. p.76-84, ilus, tab.
Monography in Spanish | BINACIS | ID: bin-138441
11.
In. Instituto del Medio Ambiente de la Provincia de Buenso Aires (Buenos Aires, AR). Cuencas hídricas: contaminación, evaluación de riesgo y saneamiento. La Plata, s.n, 1996. p.76-84, ilus, tab. (63916).
Monography in Spanish | BINACIS | ID: bin-63916
12.
Buenos Aires; Humedales para las Américas; 1993. 74 p. Ilus, tab.(Humedales para las Américas, 10).
Monography in Spanish | BINACIS | ID: bin-136799
13.
Buenos Aires; Humedales para las Américas; 1993. 74 p. ilus, tab.(Humedales para las Américas, 10).
Monography in Spanish | BINACIS | ID: biblio-1220074
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...