Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 61
Filter
1.
Obes Surg ; 34(6): 2101-2110, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619771

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The feasibility of early telerehabilitation after bariatric surgery is unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and perception of engaging in the online exercise protocol in patients during the first month after bariatric surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 67 patients, enrolled in a telerehabilitation program following bariatric surgery, completed a survey assessing their perception of the intensity, discomfort, and safety during exercise sessions. RESULTS: Forty percent of participants began exercising between 5 and 10 days after surgery. Seventy-one percent of patients did not experience discomfort during the first month of exercise, and those who reported discomfort mainly mentioned dizziness and abdominal pain. No significant differences were found in the presence of discomfort among different types of surgeries performed. There was a significant difference in the presence of discomfort between patients who started exercising before and after 15 days of surgery, with less discomfort reported in the group that started after 15 days. Ninety-eight percent of patients felt safe during online exercise sessions. Most participants perceived the intensity of the sessions as moderate. The most frequently mentioned benefits of exercise were increased energy, mood, and feeling more active. CONCLUSION: Telerehabilitation conducted during the first month after bariatric surgery was feasible and well tolerated by patients, providing a safe alternative for those patients who face difficulties with in-person interventions.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Exercise Therapy , Feasibility Studies , Obesity, Morbid , Telerehabilitation , Humans , Female , Male , Bariatric Surgery/rehabilitation , Adult , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Obesity, Morbid/psychology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Patient Satisfaction
2.
Obes Surg ; 34(5): 1764-1777, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38592648

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The International Federation for Surgery for Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Global Registry aims to provide descriptive data about the caseload and penetrance of surgery for metabolic disease and obesity in member countries. The data presented in this report represent the key findings of the eighth report of the IFSO Global Registry. METHODS: All existing Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS) registries known to IFSO were invited to contribute to the eighth report. Aggregated data was provided by each MBS registry to the team at the Australia and New Zealand Bariatric Surgery Registry (ANZBSR) and was securely stored on a Redcap™ database housed at Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Data was checked for completeness and analyzed by the IFSO Global Registry Committee. Prior to the finalization of the report, all graphs were circulated to contributors and to the global registry committee of IFSO to ensure data accuracy. RESULTS: Data was received from 24 national and 2 regional registries, providing information on 502,150 procedures. The most performed primary MBS procedure was sleeve gastrectomy, whereas the most performed revisional MBS procedure was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Asian countries reported people with lower BMI undergoing MBS along with higher rates of diabetes. Mortality was a rare event. CONCLUSION: Registries enable meaningful comparisons between countries on the demographics, characteristics, operation types and approaches, and trends in MBS procedures. Reported outcomes can be seen as flags of potential issues or relationships that could be studied in more detail in specific research studies.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Gastric Bypass , Metabolic Diseases , Obesity, Morbid , Humans , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Obesity/surgery , Gastric Bypass/methods , Metabolic Diseases/surgery , Registries , Gastrectomy/methods , Demography
4.
Obes Surg ; 33(4): 1012-1016, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36754925

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic BariClip gastroplasty (LBCG) will address a similar tubular restriction than the one achieved with the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at the level of the gastric fundus, while maintaining the advantage of simplicity and anatomic preservation. The purpose of the current study was to analyze the risk of slippage and to present the evolving technique by adding gastro-gastric plication of the gastric wall covering the BariClip at those areas where the gastric wall "slips" between the limbs of the clip. METHODS: All patients undergoing LBCG with the evolving technique of gastric plication around the device associated with antral gastroplasty from January 2021 to May 2022 were included in the study group (group A). A control group (group B) was designed with patients who underwent previous LBCG technique between May 2017 and June 2019. This is a case-controlled group with patients matched by gender and BMI. We have analyzed the postoperative complications and more notably the slippage. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six patients (44 male and 132 female) with a mean age of 33 years (± 11) underwent evolving technique of LBCG. A control group of 67 patients who underwent previous technique of LBCG was included. All procedures were completed by laparoscopy with no intraoperative complication. For the study group, we have recorded a number of 5 slippages (2.8%). The diagnosis occurred during the first 6 months after the operation. The management consisted of repositioning-3 cases-and BariClip removal-2 cases. For the control group, we have recorded a number of 3 slippages (4.3%). All three patients underwent BariClip removal, with no repositioning. CONCLUSIONS: We reported a new technique of placement of the BariClip with additional gastric plication anterior, posterior, and volume reduction in the antrum to potentially reduce the rate of slippage and improve weight loss outcomes.


Subject(s)
Gastroplasty , Laparoscopy , Obesity, Morbid , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Stomach/surgery , Gastroplasty/methods , Gastrectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Surgical Instruments , Retrospective Studies
6.
Ann Surg ; 274(5): 821-828, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34334637

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To define "best possible" outcomes for secondary bariatric surgery (BS). BACKGROUND: Management of poor response and of long-term complications after BS is complex and under-investigated. Indications and types of reoperations vary widely and postoperative complication rates are higher compared to primary BS. METHODS: Out of 44,884 BS performed in 18 high-volume centers from 4 continents between 06/2013-05/2019, 5,349 (12%) secondary BS cases were identified. Twenty-one outcome benchmarks were established in low-risk patients, defined as the 75th percentile of the median outcome values of centers. Benchmark cases had no previous laparotomy, diabetes, sleep apnea, cardiopathy, renal insufficiency, inflammatory bowel disease, immunosuppression, thromboembolic events, BMI> 50 kg/m2 or age> 65 years. RESULTS: The benchmark cohort included 3143 cases, mainly females (85%), aged 43.8 ±â€Š10 years, 8.4 ±â€Š5.3 years after primary BS, with a BMI 35.2 ±â€Š7 kg/m2. Main indications were insufficient weight loss (43%) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease/dysphagia (25%). 90-days postoperatively, 14.6% of benchmark patients presented ≥1 complication, mortality was 0.06% (n = 2). Significantly higher morbidity was observed in non-benchmark cases (OR 1.37) and after conversional/reversal or revisional procedures with gastrointestinal suture/stapling (OR 1.84). Benchmark cutoffs for conversional BS were ≤4.5% re-intervention, ≤8.3% re-operation 90-days postoperatively. At 2-years (IQR 1-3) 15.6% of benchmark patients required a reoperation. CONCLUSION: Secondary BS is safe, although postoperative morbidity exceeds the established benchmarks for primary BS. The excess morbidity is due to an increased risk of gastrointestinal leakage and higher need for intensive care. The considerable rate of tertiary BS warrants expertise and future research to optimize the management of non-success after BS.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/standards , Benchmarking/standards , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Laparoscopy/standards , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Reoperation
7.
Nat Med ; 26(4): 485-497, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32127716

ABSTRACT

People with obesity commonly face a pervasive, resilient form of social stigma. They are often subject to discrimination in the workplace as well as in educational and healthcare settings. Research indicates that weight stigma can cause physical and psychological harm, and that affected individuals are less likely to receive adequate care. For these reasons, weight stigma damages health, undermines human and social rights, and is unacceptable in modern societies. To inform healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the public about this issue, a multidisciplinary group of international experts, including representatives of scientific organizations, reviewed available evidence on the causes and harms of weight stigma and, using a modified Delphi process, developed a joint consensus statement with recommendations to eliminate weight bias. Academic institutions, professional organizations, media, public-health authorities, and governments should encourage education about weight stigma to facilitate a new public narrative about obesity, coherent with modern scientific knowledge.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Obesity/psychology , Obesity/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Social Stigma , Weight Prejudice/prevention & control , Body Weight/physiology , Humans , International Cooperation , Universities/organization & administration , Universities/standards
8.
Ann Surg ; 270(5): 859-867, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31592894

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To define "best possible" outcomes for bariatric surgery (BS)(Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB] and sleeve gastrectomy [SG]). BACKGROUND: Reference values for optimal surgical outcomes in well-defined low-risk bariatric patients have not been established so far. Consequently, outcome comparison across centers and over time is impeded by heterogeneity in case-mix. METHODS: Out of 39,424 elective BS performed in 19 high-volume academic centers from 3 continents between June 2012 and May 2017, we identified 4120 RYGB and 1457 SG low-risk cases defined by absence of previous abdominal surgery, concomitant procedures, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, cardiopathy, renal insufficiency, inflammatory bowel disease, immunosuppression, anticoagulation, BMI>50 kg/m and age>65 years. We chose clinically relevant endpoints covering the intra- and postoperative course. Complications were graded by severity using the comprehensive complication index. Benchmark values were defined as the 75th percentile of the participating centers' median values for respective quality indicators. RESULTS: Patients were mainly females (78%), aged 38±11 years, with a baseline BMI 40.8 ±â€Š5.8 kg/m. Over 90 days, 7.2% of RYGB and 6.2% of SG patients presented at least 1 complication and no patients died (mortality in nonbenchmark cases: 0.06%). The most frequent reasons for readmission after 90-days following both procedures were symptomatic cholelithiasis and abdominal pain of unknown origin. Benchmark values for both RYGB and SG at 90-days postoperatively were 5.5% Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa complication rate, 5.5% readmission rate, and comprehensive complication index ≤33.73 in the subgroup of patients presenting at least 1 grade ≥II complication. CONCLUSION: Benchmark cutoffs targeting perioperative outcomes in BS offer a new tool in surgical quality-metrics and may be implemented in quality-improvement cycle.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03440138.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Gastrectomy/methods , Gastric Bypass/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Quality of Life , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Age Factors , Benchmarking , Cohort Studies , Female , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Global Health , Hospitals, High-Volume , Humans , Internationality , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Obesity, Morbid/diagnosis , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Weight Loss
9.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 146(10): 1175-1183, dic. 2018. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-978753

ABSTRACT

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and obesity are a public health problem in Chile. Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment alternative to achieve a significant and sustained weight reduction in patients with morbid obesity. The results of controlled clinical trials indicate that, compared to medical treatment, surgery for obese patients with DM2 allows a better control of blood glucose and cardiovascular risk factors, reduces the need for medications and increases the likelihood for remission. Consensus conferences and clinical practice guidelines support bariatric surgery as an option to treat DM2 in Class III Obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40) regardless of the glycemic control and the complexity of pharmacological treatment and in Class II Obesity (BMI 35-39,9) with inadequate glycemic control despite optimal pharmacological treatment and lifestyle. However, surgical indication for patients with DM2 and BMI between 30-34.9, the most prevalent sub-group, is only suggested. The Chilean Societies of Endocrinology and Diabetes and of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery decided to generate a consensus regarding the importance of other factors related to DM2 that would allow a better selection of candidates for surgery, particularly when weight does not constitute an indication. Considering the national reality, we also need a statement regarding the selection and characteristics of the surgical procedure as well as the role of the diabetologist in the multidisciplinary team.


Subject(s)
Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/surgery , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Obesity/surgery , Societies, Medical , Body Mass Index , Chile , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Medical Illustration
10.
Rev Med Chil ; 146(10): 1175-1183, 2018 Dec.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30724982

ABSTRACT

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and obesity are a public health problem in Chile. Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment alternative to achieve a significant and sustained weight reduction in patients with morbid obesity. The results of controlled clinical trials indicate that, compared to medical treatment, surgery for obese patients with DM2 allows a better control of blood glucose and cardiovascular risk factors, reduces the need for medications and increases the likelihood for remission. Consensus conferences and clinical practice guidelines support bariatric surgery as an option to treat DM2 in Class III Obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40) regardless of the glycemic control and the complexity of pharmacological treatment and in Class II Obesity (BMI 35-39,9) with inadequate glycemic control despite optimal pharmacological treatment and lifestyle. However, surgical indication for patients with DM2 and BMI between 30-34.9, the most prevalent sub-group, is only suggested. The Chilean Societies of Endocrinology and Diabetes and of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery decided to generate a consensus regarding the importance of other factors related to DM2 that would allow a better selection of candidates for surgery, particularly when weight does not constitute an indication. Considering the national reality, we also need a statement regarding the selection and characteristics of the surgical procedure as well as the role of the diabetologist in the multidisciplinary team.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/methods , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/surgery , Obesity/surgery , Body Mass Index , Chile , Humans , Medical Illustration , Risk Factors , Societies, Medical , Treatment Outcome
11.
Surg Endosc ; 31(1): 135-141, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27139703

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple simulation training programs have demonstrated that effective transfer of skills can be attained and applied into a more complex scenario, but evidence regarding transfer to the operating room is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess junior residents trained with simulation performing an advanced laparoscopic procedure in the OR and compare results to those of general surgeons without simulation training and expert laparoscopic surgeons. METHODS: Experimental study: After a validated 16-session advanced laparoscopy simulation training program, junior trainees were compared to general surgeons (GS) with no simulation training and expert bariatric surgeons (BS) in performing a stapled jejuno-jejunostomy (JJO) in the OR. Global rating scale (GRS) and specific rating scale scores, operative time and the distance traveled by both hands measured with a tracking device, were assessed. In addition, all perioperative and immediate postoperative morbidities were registered. RESULTS: Ten junior trainees, 12 GS and 5 BS experts were assessed performing a JJO in the OR. All trainees completed the entire JJO in the OR without any takeovers by the BS. Six (50 %) BS takeovers took place in the GS group. Trainees had significantly better results in all measured outcomes when compared to GS with considerable higher GRS median [19.5 (18.8-23.5) vs. 12 (9-13.8) p < 0.001] and lower operative time. One morbidity was registered; a patient in the trainees group was readmitted at postoperative day 10 for mechanical ileus that resolved with medical treatment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated transfer of advanced laparoscopic skills acquired through a simulated training program in novice surgical residents to the OR.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Internship and Residency , Laparoscopy/education , Simulation Training , Surgeons , Bariatric Surgery , Female , General Surgery/education , Humans , Jejunostomy/education , Operative Time
12.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 13(1): 21-27, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27665150

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reductions in urinary protein excretion after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery in patients with diabetic kidney disease have been reported in multiple studies. OBJECTIVES: To determine the weight loss dependence of the effect of RYGB on urinary protein excretion by comparing renal outcomes in Zucker diabetic fatty rats undergoing either gastric bypass surgery or a sham operation with or without weight matching. SETTING: University laboratories. METHODS: Zucker diabetic fatty rats underwent surgery at 18 weeks of age. A subgroup of sham operated rats were weight matched to RYGB operated rats by restricting food intake. Urinary protein excretion was assessed at baseline and at postoperative weeks 4 and 12. Renal histology and macrophage-associated inflammation were assessed at postoperative week 12. RESULTS: Progressive urinary protein excretion was attenuated by both RYGB and diet-induced weight loss, albeit to a lesser extent by the latter. Both weight loss interventions produced equivalent reductions in glomerulomegaly, glomerulosclerosis, and evidence of renal macrophage infiltration. CONCLUSION: Weight loss per se improves renal structure and attenuates renal inflammatory responses in an experimental animal model of diabetic kidney disease. Better glycemic control post-RYGB may in part explain the greater reductions in urinary protein excretion after gastric bypass surgery.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Nephropathies/therapy , Diet, Reducing , Gastric Bypass , Weight Loss/physiology , Animals , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/therapy , Hypertrophy/therapy , Kidney Glomerulus/pathology , Macrophages/physiology , Male , Nephritis/therapy , Proteinuria/etiology , Random Allocation , Rats, Zucker , Sclerosis/therapy
13.
Surg Innov ; 24(1): 66-71, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27729567

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Simulated laparoscopy training is limited by its low-quality image. A high-definition (HD) laparoscopic training box was developed under the present necessity of simulating advanced surgery. OBJECTIVE: To describe and test a new HD laparoscopic training box for advanced simulation training. METHODS: We describe the features and image quality of the new training box. The simulator was tested and then evaluated by a group of 76 expert surgeons using a 4-item questionnaire. To assess the effectiveness of training using this simulation box, 15 general surgery residents were trained to perform a laparoscopic jejuno-jejunostomy in a validated simulation program. They were assessed with objective rating scales before and after the training program, and their results were compared with that of experts. RESULTS: The training box was assembled using high-density fiberglass shaped as an insufflated abdomen. It has an adapted full-HD camera with a LED-based illumination system. A manually self-regulated monopod attached to the camera enables training without assistance. Of the expert surgeons who answered the questionnaire, 91% said that the simulation box had a high-quality image and that it was very similar to real laparoscopy. All residents trained improved their rating scores significantly when comparing their initial versus final assessment ( P < .001). Their performance after completing the training in the box was similar to that of experts ( P > .2). CONCLUSIONS: This novel laparoscopic training box presents a high-resolution image and allows training different types of advanced laparoscopic procedures. The simulator box was positively assessed by experts and demonstrated to be effective for laparoscopy training in resident surgeons.


Subject(s)
General Surgery/education , Internship and Residency , Jejunostomy/education , Laparoscopy/education , Simulation Training , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Clinical Competence , Equipment Design , Humans
14.
Ann Surg Innov Res ; 10: 3, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26981148

ABSTRACT

Bariatric surgery has been considered one of best treatments for obesity. As every surgical procedure-and any medical intervention, it is not exempt of complications, among which leaks, strictures, acute hemorrhages and fistulae highlight. Leaks are more common in the gastro-jejunal anastomosis (GJA) in the case of Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), while in Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) they locate in the stapler line. Stenosis can be seen in the gastro-jejunostomy in the RYGB and in the gastric tube in case of the LSG. For each of these complications, many innovative solutions have been developed, including new surgical devices. In spite of promising good results, evidence regarding utility and safeness of these technologies is still scarce. Self-expandable endoscopic stents have been used to treat leaks, with an overall success rate of 80-90 % and a migration rate of 15-35 %. The bear trap-like over-the-scope (Ovesco) clips have been used to treat GI hemorrhages, leaks and even fistulae, with a 70-80 % success rate, although more endoscopic sessions may be needed. Overstitch, an endosurgical suture devices, have been used to treat leaks, fistulae and perforations. Overall, technical success achievement approaches to 90 %, while clinical success ranges from 80 to 90 %, except for leaks closure, where a lower success rate has been observed. Despite of all of these advances, early diagnosis and treatment remains the main strategy to achieve success. In summary, novel therapies for complication management can be very useful, though further studies with larger series are still needed in order to confirm their efficacy and safeness.

15.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 11(5): 1127-32, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26645489

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of body mass index (BMI) as the only criterion to indicate bariatric surgery is currently under discussion. There is growing evidence that supports bariatric surgery in carefully selected patients with lower BMI. OBJECTIVES: To report our experience in bariatric surgery in>1000 patients with BMI<35 kg/m(2) and their results at 1 year. SETTING: University hospital (censored). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with preoperative BMI<35 kg/m(2) from January 2008 to December 2011. Demographic and anthropometric data, preoperative co-morbidities, and perioperative variables were retrieved. Weight loss and co-morbidities progression were analyzed 1 year after surgery and compared among procedures. A P value<.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: We identified 1119 patients: mean age 38.8±11.4, 951 (85%) women, preoperative weight 87.5±9.3 kg and BMI 33.1 (31.9-34.1) kg/m(2). Preoperatively, 11.7% had type 2 diabetes mellitus, 25.9% arterial hypertension, 55.6% insulin resistance, and 53.2% dyslipidemia. In total, 283 patients (25.2%) underwent LRYGB and 836 (74.8%) SG. One year after surgery (follow-up: 66.67%) patients reached 24.5 (22.8-26.4) BMI and the percentage of excess of weight loss (%EWL) was 107.9±36.6%. Diabetes, hypertension, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia remission/improvement rates were 54/39%, 58/29%, 72/17%, and 54/30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery in selected class I obesity patients can safely be performed. We have observed good results in terms of weight loss and co-morbidity improvement/remission. Long-term follow-up is required.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/methods , Body Mass Index , Laparoscopy/methods , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Adult , Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Chile , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastrectomy/methods , Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Gastric Bypass/methods , Hospitals, University , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/diagnosis , Preoperative Period , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Weight Loss/physiology
16.
J Surg Educ ; 72(4): 648-53, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26073475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intensive training programs arose from limitations in access to simulation centers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect and associated factors involved in an intensive course for learning advanced laparoscopic skills, which include validated teaching techniques. METHODS: General surgeons and final-year residents were analyzed after completing an intensive 5-session advanced laparoscopy course. Initial (IA) and final assessment (FA) consisted in performing a jejunojejunal anastomosis in a live porcine model, measured using objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) (GRS and SRS, that is, global rating scale and specific rating scale, respectively) and operative time (OT). The 3-session training was structured in a bench model with an ex vivo bowel. For the demographic analysis, 3 groups were defined according to the presentation of relevant changes in OSATS and in OT between IA and FA: group A, no changes; group B, change in 1 variable; and group C, change in both variables. RESULTS: After the course, all 114 participants presented a significant improvement in OT (37 vs 24.6min, p < 0.001) and in OSATS; global rating scale (10.5 vs 16 points; p < 0.001) and Specific Rating Scale (8.5 vs 12.7 points; p < 0.001). In the IA, 70 (61%) participants completed the jejunojejunal anastomosis and 105(92%) in the FA (p < 0.01). In the FA, 56% of participants presented relevant changes in both variables (group C). This group was significantly younger (34 vs 45 vs 40y old; p < 0.001), had fewer years of surgical experience (2 vs 9 vs 5y; p < 0.001), and had a proportionally higher concentration of residents (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This intensive course is set out as a viable alternative to teach basic skills in advanced laparoscopy in a short period of time, which is ideal for surgeons with difficult access to training centers. It remains necessary to establish the participant profile for which this type of course is most beneficial.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical/education , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , General Surgery/education , Jejunum/surgery , Laparoscopy/education , Adult , Aged , Animals , Educational Measurement , Humans , Internship and Residency , Middle Aged , Swine
17.
Obes Surg ; 25(10): 1816-21, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25840555

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative leaks are a dreaded complication after bariatric surgery (BS). Its treatment is based on nutritional support and sepsis control by antibiotics, collections drainage and/or prosthesis, and/or surgery. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to report our experience with coated self-expandable endoscopic stents (SEES) for leaks treatment. SETTING: This study was performed in a University Hospital, (censored). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of our BS database from January 2007 to December 2013. All patients with leak after BS treated with SEES were included. RESULTS: We identified 29 patients; 17 (59%) were women, with median age of 37 (19-65) years, and preoperative body mass index of 40 (28.7-56-6) kg/m(2). Nineteen (65.5%) patients had a sleeve gastrectomy and 10 (34.5%) a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. All patients had a leak in the stapler line. Median time from surgery to leak diagnosis was 7 (1-51) days, and SEES were installed 8 (0-104) days after diagnosis. Twenty-one (72%) patients also had abdominal exploration. Median length of SEES use was 60 (1-299) days. Patients who had SEES as primary treatment (with or without simultaneous reoperation) had a shorter leak closure time (50 [6-112] vs 109 [60-352] days; p = 0.008). Twenty-eight (96.5%) patients successfully achieved leak closure with SEES. There were 16 migrations in 10 (34%) patients, 1 (3%) stent fracture, 1 opening of the blind end of alimentary limb (3%), and 5 patients (17%) required a second stent due to leak persistence. CONCLUSIONS: SEES is a feasible, safe, and effective management of post BS leaks, although patients may also require prosthesis revision and abdominal exploration. Primary SEES placement is associated with a shorter leak resolution time.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Early Medical Intervention/methods , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Self Expandable Metallic Stents , Surgical Stapling/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Bariatric Surgery/instrumentation , Body Mass Index , Drainage , Early Medical Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/instrumentation , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Feasibility Studies , Female , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastrectomy/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Postoperative Period , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects , Surgical Stapling/methods , Young Adult
18.
Obes Surg ; 25(4): 615-21, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25638655

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Internal hernias (IH) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are a serious concern among surgeons and are often under-diagnosed due to heterogeneity of clinical manifestations. Our aim is to assess the frequency of IH after a RYGB in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of our bariatric surgery unit's database between 2001 and 2013 is obtained. Patients are surgically explored after RYGB due to acute bowel obstruction (ABO), intermittent abdominal pain (IAP), or being asymptomatic (during an elective cholecystectomy) in whom anatomical presence of IH was established. Also, we compared patients with retrocolic and antecolic technique. Statistical analysis with non-parametric tests and chi-square are used. RESULTS: Of the patients, 3,656 submitted to RYGB during this period, 81.9% (2,993) by laparoscopy and 26.3% (963) with retrocolic technique. Of the patients, 130 (3.5%) were surgically explored due to ABO, 27 patients (0.7%) due to IAP, and 93 patients (2.5%) submitted to an elective cholecystectomy with exploration for IH. IH was present in 75% of the obstructed patients, and in 69%, it was the cause of obstruction. Patients with IAP showed 59% of IH, but only 15% have herniated bowel. In asymptomatic patients, 25% showed IH and none of them have herniated bowel. Retrocolic technique showed a higher risk of whole causes of ABO and IH than the antecolic technique, with a relative risk of 1.53 (1.07-2.17) and 1.62 (1.06-2.47), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A high frequency of IH exists in all operated patients of this series. All members of the bariatric team should be aware of the symptoms related to IH and actively pursue it during follow-up.


Subject(s)
Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Hernia, Abdominal/epidemiology , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Abdominal Pain/epidemiology , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adult , Cholecystectomy/adverse effects , Cholecystectomy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Gastric Bypass/methods , Gastric Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Hernia, Abdominal/etiology , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/epidemiology , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
19.
Obes Surg ; 25(4): 744-9, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25618780

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Revisional surgery has become a widely accepted alternative for weight loss failure/regain after bariatric surgery. However, it is associated to higher morbi-mortality and lesser weight loss than primary bariatric procedure. Our aims are to present a novel technique for weight loss treatment after failed laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and to report its short-term results. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients submitted to a revisional hand-sewn double-layer gastrojejunal plication (GJP) for treatment of weight loss failure/regain after LRYGB. Analysis of demographics, body mass index (BMI), and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) at the 6th month complications, and financial costs involved was included. RESULTS: Four patients were submitted to revisional GJP. Three patients were female and the mean age at revision was 30 ± 9 years (21-44). The median time interval between LRYGB and GJP was 51 months (24-120). The median BMI at the moment of GJP and the 3rd and 6th month was 35.6 kg/m2 (32.0-37.8), 32.2 kg/m2 (29.7-34.1), and 30.7 kg/m2 (28.1-32.1), respectively. The median %EWL at the 3rd and 6th month was 35.4% (13.6-38.9) and 46.2 % (45.1-55.5), respectively, reaching a cumulative (combined surgeries) %EWL of 62.9% (16.5-67.9) and 71.7% (65.1-77.6), respectively. There were no complications or mortality. Financial costs were significantly lower compared to revisional gastrojejunal stapled reduction (US $1400 cheaper). CONCLUSION: Revisional GJP is a feasible, safe, and cost-effective novel procedure for treatment of weight loss failure/regain after LRYGB. Mid- and long-term results are necessary in order to establish its real effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Gastric Bypass , Jejunoileal Bypass/methods , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Suture Techniques , Adult , Body Mass Index , Female , Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Gastric Bypass/economics , Gastric Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs , Humans , Jejunoileal Bypass/economics , Jejunoileal Bypass/instrumentation , Jejunoileal Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Laparoscopy/economics , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Obesity, Morbid/economics , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Reoperation/economics , Reoperation/instrumentation , Reoperation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Suture Techniques/economics , Sutures/economics , Treatment Failure , Weight Loss , Young Adult
20.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol ; 308(4): R321-9, 2015 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25540099

ABSTRACT

Bariatric surgery rapidly improves Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Our objective was to profile and compare the extent and duration of improved glycemic control following Roux-en-Y gastric (RYGB) bypass surgery and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and compare against calorie restriction/weight loss and medical combination therapy-based approaches using the Zucker diabetic fatty rat (ZDF) rodent model of advanced T2DM. Male ZDF rats underwent RYGB (n = 15) or SG surgery (n = 10) at 18 wk of age and received postsurgical insulin treatment, as required to maintain mid-light-phase glycemia within a predefined range (10-15 mmol/l). In parallel, other groups of animals underwent sham surgery with ad libitum feeding (n = 6), with body weight (n = 8), or glycemic matching (n = 8) to the RYGB group, using food restriction or a combination of insulin, metformin, and liraglutide, respectively. Both bariatric procedures decreased the daily insulin dose required to maintain mid-light-phase blood glucose levels below 15 mmol/l, compared with those required by body weight or glycemia-matched rats (P < 0.001). No difference was noted between RYGB and SG with regard to initial efficacy. SG was, however, associated with higher food intake, weight regain, and higher insulin requirements vs. RYGB at study end (P < 0.05). Severe hypoglycemia occurred in several rats after RYGB. RYGB and SG significantly improved glycemic control in a rodent model of advanced T2DM. While short-term outcomes are similar, long-term efficacy appears marginally better after RYGB, although this is tempered by the increased risk of hypoglycemia.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/drug effects , Caloric Restriction , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Gastrectomy , Gastric Bypass , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacology , Obesity/therapy , Weight Loss/drug effects , Age Factors , Animals , Behavior, Animal , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Combined Modality Therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Therapy, Combination , Eating , Feeding Behavior , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1/analogs & derivatives , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1/pharmacology , Hypoglycemia/blood , Hypoglycemia/etiology , Hypoglycemic Agents/toxicity , Insulin/pharmacology , Liraglutide , Male , Metformin/pharmacology , Obesity/blood , Obesity/physiopathology , Rats, Zucker , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Weight Gain
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...