Can neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, platelet-to-lymphocyte and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratios be useful to the diagnosis of aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine the role of hematological parameters - neutrophil/lymphocyte, platelet/lymphocyte, and monocyte/lymphocyte ratios - in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 244 patients who had primary total knee arthroplasty and 66 patients with aseptic loosening developed after total knee arthroplasty. The white blood cell counts, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, monocyte/lymphocyte ratio and c-reactive protein levels in both groups were determined using the results of venous blood samples collected during preoperative preparation and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Our study findings reveal that the monocyte/lymphocyte ratio of the group with aseptic loosening was statistically significantly different from that of the patient group who had primary total knee arthroplasty (p=0.02). Furthermore, although c-reactive protein levels are not high enough to suggest systemic inflammation, the difference between the groups is statistically significant (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: No hematological parameter that could be used in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening has been defined in the literature so far. This study demonstrated that the monocyte/lymphocyte ratio could be a helpful parameter in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening (Tab. 1, Fig. 1, Ref. 28).

Preoperative Association of Abdominal Striae Gravidarum with Intraabdominal Adhesions in Pregnant Women with a History of Previous Cesarean Section: a Cross-sectional Study.

Introduction: Intraabdominal adhesions that develop because of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery may cause problems during surgery. Complications can include difficult intraabdominal entry; injury to the urinary bladder, uterus or small intestine; longer operation times, and increased blood loss. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the association between abdominal striae gravidarum and intraabdominal adhesions in the preoperative period in pregnant women with a history of cesarean section. Materials and Methods: The study included 247 pregnant women at ≥ 37 weeks of gestation admitted to the labor unit for delivery; all had undergone at least one previous cesarean section. Abdominal striae were assessed preoperatively using the Davey scoring system; the severity and intensity of adhesions were subsequently evaluated intraoperatively according to the modified Nair scoring system. Results: No striae were seen in 104 pregnant women; 41 had mild striae and 102 had severe striae. Overall, 113 cases had no adhesions (grade 0), 106 had grade 1-2 adhesions, and 28 had grade 3-4 adhesions. Among patients with grade 0 adhesions, 34 (13.7 %) had no striae, while 79 (31.9 %) had mild-to-severe striae (p < 0.001; sensitivity 55 %; specificity 67 %; positive predictive value 69 %; negative predictive value 52 %). Among women with grade 1-2 adhesions, 48 (19.4 %) had no striae, while 58 (23.4 %) had mild-to-severe striae. Finally, among women with grade 3-4 adhesions, 22 (8.9 %) had no striae, while 6 (2.4 %) had mild-to-severe striae (p < 0.001). A p-value < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance. Conclusions: The abdominal adhesion score dropped as the abdominal striae gravidarum score rose during the preoperative period. Addition of this useful, easy-to-apply, inexpensive, adjunctive, observational, abdominal scoring method to the obstetrical work-up can provide important clues about the intraabdominal adhesion status of pregnant women scheduled for cesarean delivery because of previous cesarean section.