Preoperative Symptoms of Depression are Associated With Worse Capability 6-weeks and 6-months After Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of depression have been associated with greater incapability following total hip arthroplasty (THA). A brief, 2-question, measure of symptoms of depression - the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) - may be sufficient to measure associations with the magnitude of incapability during recovery from THA. This study investigated whether preoperative symptoms of depression (measured with the PHQ-2) correlated with levels of incapability 6 weeks and 6 months after THA, accounting for demographic and clinical factors. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study across 5 centers and recruited 101 patients undergoing THA, of whom 90 (89%) completed follow-up. Patients completed demographics, a preoperative 2-item (PHQ-2) measure of symptoms of depression, and the Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) at 6-weeks and 6-months postoperatively. Negative binomial regression models determined factors associated with HOOS JR at 6 weeks and 6 months, accounting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Accounting for potential confounding factors, we found that higher preoperative PHQ-2 scores (reflecting greater symptoms of depression) were associated with lower HOOS JR scores (reflecting a greater level of hip disability) at both 6 weeks (regression coefficient = -0.67, P < .001) and 6 months (regression coefficient = -1.9, P < .001) after THA. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of depression on a 2-question preoperative questionnaire are common, and greater symptoms of depression are associated with reduced capability within the first year following THA. These findings support the prioritization of routine mental health assessments before THA. Measuring mindset using relatively brief instruments will be important considering the current shift toward implementing self-reported measures of health status in clinical practice and incorporating them within alternative payment models.

Capability After Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis Is Strongly Associated With Preoperative Symptoms of Depression.

BACKGROUND: Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to improve the level of capability (ability to perform valued life activities) associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, some evidence suggests a substantial proportion of patients remain dissatisfied with their outcomes after this procedure. We sought to better understand the association between mental health, specifically symptoms of depression, with postoperative outcomes. Symptoms of depression are shown to be common among orthopaedic populations in general and can be briefly and conveniently evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) in a less burdensome manner compared with longer mental health surveys. This study assesses the association between preoperative depressive symptoms (PHQ-2) and levels of capability at 6 weeks and 6 months after TKA. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study involving 114 patients with knee OA across five clinics in California and Texas scheduled for TKA. Participants completed a preoperative PHQ-2 and Knee Injury and OA Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) survey at 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA. We analyzed these data using bivariate and multivariable regression. RESULTS: Preoperative PHQ-2 scores were significantly associated with lower KOOS JR scores at 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA. Latino/Hispanic race was also associated with lower KOOS JR scores at 6 weeks. The association between preoperative depressive symptoms and level of capability after TKA were more pronounced at 6 months compared with 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Preoperative symptoms of depression are strongly associated with reduced capability after TKA and can be screened for using the PHQ-2-a brief tool that can be feasibly incorporated into clinical workflows. User-friendly assessment of depressive symptoms can assist orthopaedic surgeons in identifying and addressing mental health at the outset during the management of knee OA.

Outcomes Vary Significantly Using a Tiered Approach To Define Success After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Background: Clinical outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) are commonly assessed through patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). The purpose of this study was to use progressively more stringent definitions of success to evaluate clinical outcomes of primary THA at 1-year postoperatively and to determine if demographic variables were associated with achievement of clinical success. Methods: The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was queried from 2012-2020 for primary THA. Patients that completed the following PROMs preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively were included: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and HOOS for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR). Mean PROM scores were determined for each visit and between-visit changes were evaluated using paired t-tests. Rates of achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) by distribution-based and anchor-based criteria, patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were calculated. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between demographic variables and odds of success. Results: 7,001 THAs were included. Mean improvement in PROM scores were: HOOS, JR, 37; WOMAC-Pain, 39; WOMAC-Function, 41 (p<0.0001 for all). Rates of achievement of each metric were: distribution-based MCID, 88-93%; anchor-based MCID, 68-90%; PASS, 47-84%; SCB, 68-84%. Age and sex were the most influential demographic factors on achievement of clinical success. Conclusion: There is significant variability in clinical outcomes at 1 year after primary THA when using a tiered approach to define success from the patient's perspective. Tiered approaches to interpretation of PROMs should be considered for future research and clinical assessment. Level of Evidence: III.

Coaching for the Orthopedic Surgery Leader.

From the increase in telehealth to the expansion of private investors to the growth of transparency (both price and patient outcomes) and value-based care initiatives, health-care delivery is rapidly changing. At the same time, demand for musculoskeletal care continues to rapidly increase, with more than 1.7 billion people globally suffering from musculoskeletal conditions, yet burnout is a major concern and growing since the onset COVID-19 global pandemic. When taken together, these factors have a major impact on the health-care delivery environment and pose enormous challenges and increased stressors on orthopedic surgeons and their teams. Coaching can help.

Association of Unmet Social Needs With Level of Capability in People With Persistent Knee Pain.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal providers are increasingly recognizing the importance of social factors and their association with health outcomes as they aim to develop more comprehensive models of care delivery. Such factors may account for some of the unexplained variation between pathophysiology and level of pain intensity and incapability experienced by people with common conditions, such as persistent nontraumatic knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA). Although the association of one's social position (for example, income, employment, or education) with levels of pain and capability are often assessed in OA research, the relationship between aspects of social context (or unmet social needs) and such symptomatic and functional outcomes in persistent knee pain are less clear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are unmet social needs associated with the level of capability in patients experiencing persistently painful nontraumatic knee conditions, accounting for sociodemographic factors? (2) Do unmet health-related social needs correlate with self-reported quality of life? METHODS: We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study between January 2021 and August 2021 at a university academic medical center providing comprehensive care for patients with persistent lower extremity joint pain secondary to nontraumatic conditions such as age-related knee OA. A final 125 patients were included (mean age 62 ± 10 years, 65% [81 of 125] women, 47% [59 of 125] identifying as White race, 36% [45 of 125] as Hispanic or Latino, and 48% [60 of 125] with safety-net insurance or Medicaid). We measured patient-reported outcomes of knee capability (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement), quality of life (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System [PROMIS] Global Physical Health and PROMIS Global Mental Health), and unmet social needs (Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Survey, accounting for insufficiencies related to housing, food, transportation, utilities, and interpersonal violence), as well as demographic factors. RESULTS: After controlling for demographic factors such as insurance status, education attained, and household income, we found that reduced knee-specific capability was moderately associated with experiencing unmet social needs (including food insecurity, housing instability, transportation needs, utility needs, or interpersonal safety) (standardized beta regression coefficient [ß] = -4.8 [95% confidence interval -7.9 to -1.7]; p = 0.002 and substantially associated with unemployment (ß = -13 [95% CI -23 to -3.8]; p = 0.006); better knee-specific capability was substantially associated with having Medicare insurance (ß = 12 [95% CI 0.78 to 23]; p = 0.04). After accounting for factors such as insurance status, education attained, and household income, we found that older age was associated with better general mental health (ß = 0.20 [95% CI 0.0031 to 0.39]; p = 0.047) and with better physical health (ß = 0.004 [95% CI 0.0001 to 0.008]; p = 0.04), but effect sizes were small to negligible, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is an association of unmet social needs with level of capability and unemployment in patients with persistent nontraumatic knee pain. This finding signals a need for comprehensive care delivery for patients with persistent knee pain that screens for and responds to potentially modifiable social risk factors, including those based on one's social circumstances and context, to achieve better outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

How to Create an Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Administrative Database Project: A Step-by-Step Guide Part I: Study Design.

BACKGROUND: Use of clinical and administrative databases in orthopaedic surgery research has grown substantially in recent years. It is estimated that approximately 10% of all published lower extremity arthroplasty research have been database studies. The aim of this review is to serve as a guide on how to (1) design, (2) execute, and (3) publish an orthopaedic administrative database arthroplasty project. METHODS: In part I, we discuss how to develop a research question and choose a database (when databases should/should not be used), detailing advantages/disadvantages of those most commonly used. To date, the most commonly published databases in orthopaedic research have been the National Inpatient Sample, Medicare, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and those provided by PearlDiver. General advantages of most database studies include accessibility, affordability compared to prospective research studies, ease of use, large sample sizes, and the ability to identify trends and aggregate outcomes of multiple health care systems/providers. RESULTS: Disadvantages of most databases include their retrospective observational nature, limitations of procedural/billing coding, relatively short follow-up, limited ability to control for confounding variables, and lack of functional/patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although this study is not all-encompassing, we hope it will serve as a starting point for those interested in conducting and critically reviewing lower extremity arthroplasty database studies.

How to Create an Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Database Project: A Step-by-Step Guide Part II: Study Execution.

In recent years, the use of national databases in orthopaedic surgery research has grown substantially with database studies comprising an estimated ∼10% of all published lower extremity arthroplasty research. The aim of this review is to serve as a guide on how to: (1) design; (2) execute; and (3) publish an orthopaedic database arthroplasty project. In part II, we discuss how to collect data, propose a novel checklist/standards for presenting orthopaedic database information (SOPOD), discuss methods for appropriate data interpretation/analysis, and summarize how to convert findings to a manuscript (providing a previously published example study). Data collection can be divided into two stages: baseline patient demographics and primary/secondary outcomes of interest. Our proposed SOPOD is more orthopaedic-centered and builds upon previous standards for observational studies from the EQUATOR network. There are a host of statistical methods available to analyze data to compare baseline demographics, primary/secondary outcomes, and reduce type 1 errors seen in large datasets. When drafting a manuscript, it is important to consider and discuss the limitations of database studies, including their retrospective nature, issues with coding/billing, differences in statistical versus clinical significance (or relevance), lack of surgery details (approach, laterality, and implants), and limited sampling or follow-up. We hope this paper will serve as a starting point for those interested in conducting lower extremity arthroplasty database studies.

Does Value-Based Care Threaten Joint Arthroplasty Access for Vulnerable Patient Populations?: AOA Critical Issues.

ABSTRACT: Health-care expenses have been projected to increase from 17.7% of the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) in 2014 to 19.6% in 2024. The unsustainable increase in health-care costs has contributed toward support for value-based health care (VBHC) reform. Contemporary VBHC reform programs relevant to orthopaedic surgery include the voluntary Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiatives (BPCI and BPCI-Advanced) and the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program, a mandatory bundled payment program.The purported benefits of transitioning from volume-based reimbursement to value-based reimbursement include moving from a fragmented provider-centered care model to a patient-centered model, with greater care coordination and alignment among providers focused on improving value. VBHC models allow innovative strategies to proactively invest resources to promote value (e.g., the use of nurse navigators) while eliminating unnecessary resources that do not promote value. However, major concerns regarding VBHC include the absence of medical and socioeconomic risk stratification as well as decreased access for higher-risk patients.This article identifies the benefits and potential unintended consequences of VBHC reform, with a focus on joint arthroplasty. We also discuss some potential strategies to promote innovation and improve value without compromising access for vulnerable patients.

Testing a Novel Inpatient Respiratory Depression Electronic Clinical Quality Measure (eCQM) for Orthopedic Practice in Two Large U.S. Health Systems.

The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of using an electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) to assess inpatient respiratory depression rates following elective primary total hip or total knee arthroplasty using data routinely collected in electronic health records. Measure testing was conducted at two large urban, academic health systems - Mass General Brigham and a geographically distant system in southern U.S. The risk-adjusted inpatient respiratory depression rates were 3.83 and 2.73% for the two health systems, respectively. Clinician group rates ranged from 1.40 to 4.35%, demonstrating opportunity for improvement. Both the data and measure specifications showed strong reliability and validity to allow for calculation of accurate and comparable rates of inpatient respiratory depression.

Functional Outcomes of a Musculoskeletal Integrated Practice Providing Comprehensive Whole Person Care for Hip Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of hip osteoarthritis (OA) management within integrated practice units (IPUs) are lacking. This study reports 6-month and 1-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of IPU care, the proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) at 1 year, and baseline factors associated with the likelihood of achieving MCID and SCB. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 1009 new patients presenting to an IPU with hip OA between October 2017 and June 2020. Patients experienced multidisciplinary team-based management. Individuals with baseline and 6-month PROs or baseline and 1-year PROs (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement, HOOS JR) were included. We used anchor-based MCID and SCB thresholds and multivariable binary logistic regression models to identify baseline factors associated with achieving 1-year MCID and SCB. RESULTS: HOOS JR increased from baseline to 6 months (Δ = 19.1 ± 2.1, P = .065) and baseline to 1 year (Δ = 35.8 ± 2.9, P < .001). At 1 year, 72.7% (IPU only) and 88% (IPU-based total hip arthroplasty [THA]) achieved MCID (P < .001), and 62.3% (IPU only) and 88% (IPU-based THA) achieved SCB (P < .001). In multivariable regression, lower baseline HOOS JR scores (r = 0.96, P = .04), undergoing THA (r = 0.213, P < .001), and fewer symptoms of generalized anxiety (r = 0.932, P = .018) were independently associated with achieving MCID at 1 year. The same factors were independently associated with achieving SCB at 1 year. Lower baseline anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7 item) and greater hip-related preoperative limitations result in greater likelihood of achieving MCID and SCB. CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in patient outcomes can be achieved by IPUs providing comprehensive care for hip OA including the management of psychological distress. Future prospective studies should compare the outcomes of IPUs with traditional care in managing diverse patient phenotypes.

Outcomes Vary Significantly Using a Tiered Approach to Define Success After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) allow assessment of clinical outcomes following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to use progressively more stringent definitions of success to examine clinical outcomes of primary TKA at 1 year postoperatively and to determine which demographic variables were associated with achieving clinical success. METHODS: The American Joint Replacement Registry was queried from 2012 to 2020 for primary TKA. Patients who completed the following PROMs preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively were included: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and KOOS for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR). Mean PROM scores were determined for each visit and between-visit changes were evaluated using paired t-tests. Rates of achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) by distribution-based and anchor-based criteria, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, and substantial clinical benefit were calculated. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between demographic variables and odds of clinical success. RESULTS: In total, 12,341 TKAs were included. Mean improvement in PROM scores were as follows: KOOS JR, 29; WOMAC-Pain, 33; and WOMAC-Function, 31 (P < .0001 for all). Rates of achievement of each metric were the following: distribution-based MCID, 84%-87%; anchor-based MCID, 46%-79%; Patient Acceptable Symptom State, 54%-82%; and substantial clinical benefit, 68%-81%. Patient age and gender were the most influential demographic factors on achievement of clinical success. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes at 1 year following TKA vary significantly when using a tiered approach to define success. A tiered approach to interpretation of PROMs should be considered for future research and clinical assessment.

Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into shared decision-making in the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major clinical and public health concern. The primary surgical treatment of knee OA is total knee replacement (TKR), a procedure that aims to alleviate pain and restore physical function. TKR is expensive, however, and based on professional guidelines, inappropriately performed in up to a third of patients. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) help evaluate treatment options by quantifying health outcomes that matter to patients and can thus inform shared decision-making (SDM) between patients and health professionals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a US-based 2-year, two-site hybrid type 1 study to assess clinical effectiveness and implementation of a machine learning-based patient decision aid (PDA) integrating patient-reported outcomes and clinical variables to support SDM for patients with knee OA considering TKR. Substudy 1: At one study site, a randomised controlled trial is evaluating the clinical effectiveness of the PDA and SDM process on decision quality as measured after the baseline consultation and treatment choice measured 3 and 6 months after the baseline visit among 200 patients with knee OA. Substudy 2: At a second study site, a qualitative assessment using principles of behaviour design and intervention mapping is evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the PROMs, PDA and SDM process by interviewing seven health professionals and 25 patients before and 25 patients after PDA implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from The University of Texas at Austin Institutional Review Board (protocol number: 2018-11-0042). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Study results will be disseminated through conference presentations, publications and professional societies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04805554.

Effects of Hospital and Surgeon Volume on Patient Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty: Reported From the American Joint Replacement Registry.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and complications because it relates to surgeon and hospital volume for patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the American Joint Replacement Registry from 2012 to 2017. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on Medicare-eligible cases of primary elective THAs and TKAs reported to the American Joint Replacement Registry database and was linked with the available Centers of Medicaid and Medicare Services claims and the National Death Index data from 2012 to 2017. Surgeon and hospital volume were defined separately based on the median annual number of anatomic-specific total arthroplasty procedures performed on patients of any age per surgeon and per hospital. Values were aggregated into separate surgeon and hospital volume tertile groupings and combined to create pairwise comparison surgeon/hospital volume groupings for hip and knee. RESULTS: Adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis found low surgeon/low hospital volume to have the greatest association with all-cause revisions after THA (odds ratio [OR], 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-1.89, P < 0.0001) and TKA (OR, 1.72, 95% CI, 1.44-2.06, P < 0.0001), early revisions because of periprosthetic joint infection after THA (OR, 2.50, 95% CI, 1.53-3.15, P < 0.0001) and TKA (OR, 2.18, 95% CI, 1.64-2.89, P < 0.0001), risk of early THA instability and dislocation (OR, 2.47, 95% CI, 1.77-3.46, P < 0.0001), and 90-day mortality after THA (OR, 1.72, 95% CI, 1.27-2.35, P = 0.0005) and TKA (OR, 1.47, 95% CI, 1.15-1.86, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate considerably greater THA and TKA complications when performed at low-volume hospitals by low-volume surgeons. Given the data from previous literature including this study, a continued push through healthcare policies and healthcare systems is warranted to direct THA and TKA procedures to high-volume centers by high-volume surgeons because of the evident decrease in complications and considerable costs associated with all-cause revisions, periprosthetic joint infection, instability, and 90-day mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.