Unraveling the Uncommon: A Case Report of Giant Cell Myocarditis and Examination of Existing Literature.

BACKGROUND Idiopathic giant cell myocarditis (IGCM) is an uncommon and frequently fatal type of myocarditis. It primarily affects young individuals and has the potential to result in heart failure and life-threatening arrhythmias. IGCM seems to be dependent on activation of CD4-positive T lymphocytes and can show improvement with treatment aimed at reducing T-cell function. We present a case of a 65-year-old patient who presented with features of acute heart failure refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), due to IGCM. A review of the natural history and treatment of IGCM is also presented. CASE REPORT A 65-year-old woman with multiple comorbidities was admitted to our hospital for ventricular tachycardia in the setting of progressive non-ischemic heart failure, unresponsive to GDMT. This led to further investigation, including an endomyocardial biopsy, which revealed inflammatory infiltration, with multinucleated giant cells and lymphocytes in the absence of granuloma formation, prompting a diagnosis of IGCM. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was placed for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death and the patient was initiated on combined immunosuppressive therapy. Owing to numerous comorbidities, she was determined to be unsuitable for a heart transplant. Unfortunately, she eventually died from complications secondary to the disease. CONCLUSIONS IGCM remains a challenging clinical diagnosis with a poor long-term outcome without heart transplantation. This case highlights the importance of considering atypical causes of heart failure in patients who do not respond to conventional therapies. Early recognition and appropriate management, involving medical and interventional approaches, are crucial in improving outcomes for patients with IGCM.

Etiologies and Predictors of 30-Day Readmission in Heart Failure: An Updated Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Readmissions in heart failure (HF), historically reported as 20%, contribute to significant patient morbidity and high financial cost to the healthcare system. The changing population landscape and risk factor dynamics mandate periodic epidemiologic reassessment of HF readmissions. Methods: National Readmission Database (NRD, 2019) was used to identify HF-related hospitalizations and evaluated for demographic, admission characteristics, and comorbidity differences between patients readmitted vs. those not readmitted at 30-days. Causes of readmission and predictors of all-cause, HF-specific, and non-HF-related readmissions were analyzed. Results: Of 48,971 HF patients, the readmitted cohort was younger (mean 67.4 vs. 68.9 years, p≤0.001), had higher proportion of males (56.3% vs. 53.7%), lowest income quartiles (33.3% vs. 28.9%), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥3 (61.7% vs. 52.8%), resource utilization including large bed-size hospitalizations, Medicaid enrollees, mean length of stay (6.2 vs. 5.4 days), and disposition to other facilities (23.9% vs. 20%) than non-readmitted. Readmission (30-day) rate was 21.2% (10,370) with cardiovascular causes in 50.3% (HF being the most common: 39%), and non-cardiac in 49.7%. Independent predictors for readmission were male sex, lower socioeconomic status, nonelective admissions, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, anemia, and CCI ≥3. HF-specific readmissions were significantly associated with prior coronary artery disease and Medicaid enrollment. Conclusions: Our analysis revealed cardiac and noncardiac causes of readmission were equally common for 30-day readmissions in HF patients with HF itself being the most common etiology highlighting the importance of addressing the comorbidities, both cardiac and non-cardiac, to mitigate the risk of readmission.

Outcomes among heart failure patients hospitalized for acute pulmonary embolism and COVID-19 infection: Insight from the National Inpatient Sample.

There is paucity of data regarding the outcomes of hospitalized acute pulmonary embolism (PE) patients with heart failure (HF) and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. We utilized the 2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database in conducting a retrospective cohort study to investigate the outcomes of hospitalized acute PE patients with HF and COVID-19, looking at its impact on in-hospital mortality, thrombolysis, and thrombectomy utilization as well as hospital length of stay (LOS). A total of 23,413 hospitalized acute PE patients with HF were identified in our study, of which 1.26% (n = 295/23,413) had COVID-19 infection. Utilizing a stepwise survey multivariable logistic regression model that adjusted for confounders, COVID-19 infection among acute PE patients with HF was found to be an independent predictor of overall in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-6.67; p = 0.023) and thrombolysis utilization (aOR: 5.52; 95% CI, 2.57-11.84; p ≤ 0.001) compared to those without COVID-19. However, there were comparable rates of thrombectomy utilization and LOS among acute PE patients with HF regardless of the COVID-19 infection status. On subgroup analysis, patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction was found to be associated with increased risk for in-hospital mortality (aOR: 3.89; 95% CI, 1.33-11.39; p = 0.013) and thrombectomy utilization (aOR: 4.58; 95% CI, 1.08-19.41; p = 0.042), whereas both HF subtypes were associated with increased thrombolysis utilization. COVID-19 infection among acute PE patients with HF was associated with higher over-all in-hospital mortality and increased thrombolysis utilization but had comparable hospital LOS as well as thrombectomy utilization.

Assessing the future risks of subsequent pregnancies in peripartum cardiomyopathy.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy is a myocardial disease process which occurs in young women either in late pregnancy or the early postpartum period. Due to the young age of women effected by this disease, many of these patients elect to pursue a subsequent pregnancy after their initial diagnosis. Currently, echocardiography is used to better elucidate the cardiovascular risks these young patients face when undergoing a subsequent pregnancy; however, the most accurate modality to determine these risks is debatable. In this review, we explore the current literature regarding the use and accuracy of resting transthoracic echocardiography, exercise stress echocardiography, and dobutamine stress echocardiography in risk stratification of a subsequent pregnancy in a patient with peripartum cardiomyopathy.

Impact of COVID-19 on Heart Failure Hospitalizations.

The Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has transformed individual lives and societal framework on a global scale, and in no other sector is this more evident than healthcare. Herein, we aim to describe the impact of the current COVID-19 pandemic and its associated restrictions on heart failure (HF) admissions. In this retrospective cohort study, we obtained administrative data for patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF (identified by ICD-10 code) with discharge dates ranging from January 2019 to November 2020. The study is comprised of 2 distinct sub-cohorts: HF admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic (case) period from March 2020 to October 2020 and corresponding control period during the previous year (March 2019 to December 2019). Primary outcome analysis involved comparison of total and daily HF admissions and secondary outcomes included hospital Length of Stay (LOS) and 30-day readmissions. The number of total HF admissions and average daily admissions were significantly lower in 2020 compared to 2019 (774 vs. 864; p < 0.001 and 3.17 vs. 3.53 days; p < 0.001), respectively. Average length of stay was significantly higher between March and October 2020 relative to the same months in 2019 (6.05 vs. 5.25 days; p < 0.001). Thirty-day readmission rates were also significantly higher in March-October 2020 compared to the same months in 2019 (20.6% vs. 19.1%; p < 0.001). During the pandemic, both readmission rates and length of stay for HF-related admissions were significantly impacted. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted HF-related admissions as well as associated LOS and 30-day readmissions. High-risk patients should be identified carefully, and timely and appropriate treatment should be provided.

Myocardial injury and COVID-19: Possible mechanisms.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has quickly progressed to a global health emergency. Respiratory illness is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients with the disease spectrum ranging from asymptomatic subclinical infection, to severe pneumonia progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome. There is growing evidence describing pathophysiological resemblance of SARS-CoV-2 infection with other coronavirus infections such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Angiotensin Converting Enzyme-2 receptors play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of the virus. Disruption of this receptor leads to cardiomyopathy, cardiac dysfunction, and heart failure. Patients with cardiovascular disease are more likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 and they are more likely to develop severe symptoms. Hypertension, arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy and coronary heart disease are amongst major cardiovascular disease comorbidities seen in severe cases of COVID-19. There is growing literature exploring cardiac involvement in SARS-CoV-2. Myocardial injury is one of the important pathogenic features of COVID-19. As a surrogate for myocardial injury, multiple studies have shown increased cardiac biomarkers mainly cardiac troponins I and T in the infected patients especially those with severe disease. Myocarditis is depicted as another cause of morbidity amongst COVID-19 patients. The exact mechanisms of how SARS-CoV-2 can cause myocardial injury are not clearly understood. The proposed mechanisms of myocardial injury are direct damage to the cardiomyocytes, systemic inflammation, myocardial interstitial fibrosis, interferon mediated immune response, exaggerated cytokine response by Type 1 and 2 helper T cells, in addition to coronary plaque destabilization, and hypoxia.

Wide unroofed coronary sinus and cryptogenic stroke: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Unroofed coronary sinus (UCS) is a rare congenital cardiac anomaly in which there is complete or partial absence of the roof of the coronary sinus (CS) resulting in a communication between the right and left atria. There are four types of UCS described in the literature. While usually asymptomatic and discovered incidentally on imaging, UCS can be the source of a brain abscess or paradoxical embolism. CASE SUMMARY: A 62-year-old gentleman presented to the emergency department with sudden onset of right-sided weakness and subsequent unresponsiveness. His brain computed tomography (CT) was consistent with left-sided stroke. Transthoracic echocardiography was remarkable for a dilated CS and an agitated saline study was suggestive of an UCS. A gated cardiac CT with coronary angiography confirmed a wide communication between the CS and left atrium. Right heart catheterization did not show evidence of left to right shunt. He had no abnormal rhythm on telemetry monitoring throughout his hospital stay. DISCUSSION: Unroofed coronary sinus is the least prevalent form of an atrial septal defect. Unroofed coronary sinus is usually asymptomatic and is diagnosed incidentally in imaging studies, however, it should be suspected in patients with cerebral emboli or evidence of left to right shunt with unexplained arterial desaturation. Transthoracic echocardiography is the most widely used imaging modality for the diagnosis of UCS but is limited in its ability to visualize the posterior cardiac structures such as the CS and pulmonary veins. Gated cardiac CT is a great diagnostic tool for UCS.

Trends and Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation-Flutter Hospitalizations Among Heart Transplant Recipients (From the National Inpatient Sample).

Atrial fibrillation-flutter (AF) has been described in 10% to 24% of patients after heart transplant (HT). Data on AF hospitalizations after HT are limited to single-center experiences. To bridge this gap, we performed an analysis of admissions for AF in HT patients from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) years 2000 to 2014. All hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of 427.31 or 427.32 and V42.1 were used to identify hospitalizations with AF and previous HT respectively. Among a total of 211,961 HT related hospitalizations, 1,304 (0.62%) (955 males, 349 females, mean age 59 years, median CHA2DS2Vasc score 2 [Interquartile range 1 to 3]) were admitted with a primary diagnosis AF. Most hospitalizations were nonelective (80.17%). In-hospital mortality was 2.3% and the mean length of stay (LOS) was 3.7 days. Among those patients who were discharged from hospital, 85 % were discharged to home with self-care. Most commonly reported secondary diagnoses included hypertension (57.9%), diabetes (33%), renal failure (31.3%), and congestive heart failure (22%). The event rates for ischemic stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding in the same admission with the AF hospitalization were low (1.2% and 1.2% respectively). Cardioversion was performed in 37% and ablation in 11.2% of admissions. The adjusted median cost of hospitalization was $6478.7 (IQR $3561.8 to $12352.3) and did not change significantly during the study period. AF is a relatively infrequent cause of hospitalization among HT recipients. The number of hospitalizations, ablations, cardioversions, disposition, LOS, and cost of hospitalization for AF remained stable during the study period.

The Effects of Geography on Outcomes of Routine Early Versus Selective Late Revascularization Strategy in the Treatment of Unstable Angina and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Transatlantic Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of revascularization in unstable angina (UA) or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains uncertain. We compared routine early revascularization (REV) versus selective late revascularization (SLR) strategies and divergence in the approach of cardiologists in the United States and Europe. METHODS: Seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (15,812 patients) were extracted from PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science databases. The data were pooled using the Der Simonian and Laird random-effect models and expressed as pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: Overall, there was no difference in all-cause mortality (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.95 - 1.08, P = 0.7), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.79 - 1.22, P = 0.85) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (RR: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.92 - 1.91, P = 0.12) between REV and SLR strategy. There were trends of decreased incidence of MI in REV, 13.3% (1,029/7,704) vs. 15.1% (1,108/7,314) in SLR (P = 0.007), and rate of CABG was higher in REV, 4.9% (140/2,831) vs. 3.7% (105/2,819) in SLR (P = 0.031). There were trends of lower all-cause mortality in the combined US/international trials in both REV 8.4% (390/4,624) vs. 22.8% (908/3,975) (P < 0.001) and SLR 8% (359/4,421) vs. 24% (910/3,808) (P < 0.001) compared to the European trials. There were also trends of lower rates of MI in the European trials in the REV group 20% (623/3,080) vs. 25% (712/2,893) in SLR (P = 0.001) and higher rates of CABG in REV 8.3% (96/1,144) vs. 5.7% (67/1,165) in SLR (P = 0.02); however, there were no significant effects in the pooled RR ratios even after subgroup analysis between US/international trials and European trials. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having contemporary differences in the management approach towards UA/NSTEMI patients, no significant differences in trends were observed with REV strategy in US/international trials vs. European trials.

Current Management of Heart Failure: When to Refer to Heart Failure Specialist and When Hospice is the Best Option.

Heart failure is a common syndrome caused by different abnormalities of the cardiovascular system that result in impairment of the ventricles in filling or ejecting blood. It is one of the most common causes of hospitalization in the United States, with a very high cost to the health care system. This article focuses on the causes of left ventricle dysfunction and the presentation and management of heart failure, both acute and chronic.