Satisfaction and burden of mental health personnel: data from healthcare services for substance users and their families

Objective: To evaluate satisfaction and burden of mental health personnel providing mental health services for substance users and their families. Method: Five hundred twenty-seven mental health workers who provide treatment for substance users in five Brazilian states were interviewed. Data on sociodemographic characteristics and measures of satisfaction (SATIS-BR) and burden of mental health personnel (IMPACTO-BR) were collected. Results: Type of mental health service and educational attainment were associated with degree of satisfaction and burden. Therapeutic community workers and those with a primary education level reported being more satisfied with the treatment offered to patients, their engagement in service activities, and working conditions. Workers from psychosocial care centers, psychosocial care centers focused on alcohol and other drugs, and social care referral centers (both general and specialized), as well as workers with a higher education, reported feeling overburdened. Conclusion: This study offers important information regarding the relationship of mental health personnel with their work. Care providers within this sample reported an overall high level of job satisfaction, while perceived burden differed by type of service and educational attainment. To our knowledge, this is the first study with a sample of mental health professionals working with substance users across five Brazilian states.

Satisfaction and burden of mental health personnel: data from healthcare services for substance users and their families.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate satisfaction and burden of mental health personnel providing mental health services for substance users and their families. METHOD: Five hundred twenty-seven mental health workers who provide treatment for substance users in five Brazilian states were interviewed. Data on sociodemographic characteristics and measures of satisfaction (SATIS-BR) and burden of mental health personnel (IMPACTO-BR) were collected. RESULTS: Type of mental health service and educational attainment were associated with degree of satisfaction and burden. Therapeutic community workers and those with a primary education level reported being more satisfied with the treatment offered to patients, their engagement in service activities, and working conditions. Workers from psychosocial care centers, psychosocial care centers focused on alcohol and other drugs, and social care referral centers (both general and specialized), as well as workers with a higher education, reported feeling overburdened. CONCLUSION: This study offers important information regarding the relationship of mental health personnel with their work. Care providers within this sample reported an overall high level of job satisfaction, while perceived burden differed by type of service and educational attainment. To our knowledge, this is the first study with a sample of mental health professionals working with substance users across five Brazilian states.

Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with early stage cervical cancer (stages IA2, IB1 or IIA) with risk factors such as lymph node metastasis, lympho vascular space invasion, depth invasion of more than 10mm, microscopic parametrial invasion, non-squamous histology and positive surgical margins have a high risk of recurrence when compared to patients with early stage cervical cancer with no risk factors for recurrence. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy, radiotherapy, or both in the treatment of early stage cervical cancer (stages IA2, IB1 or IIA). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2009), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, BIOLOGICAL ABSTRACTS and Cancerlit, the National Research Register and Clinical Trials register, with no language restriction. Abstracts of scientific meetings and the citation lists of included studies and other relevant publications were checked through hand searching and experts in the field were contacted to identify further reports of trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjuvant radiotherapy with adjuvant radiotherapy and cisplatin-chemotherapy after radical surgery for early stage cervix cancer were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors extracted data independently to assess whether the studies met the specified inclusion criteria. Any discrepancies were solved by a third and a forth review author. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model, with death and disease progression as outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Three trials were included. Two trials enrolling 325 participants, of whom 297 (91%) were assessed and compared radiotherapy and chemotherapy with radiotherapy alone found that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of death (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36 to 0.87) and disease progression (HR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.30 to 0.74), with no heterogeneity between trials (I(2) = 0% for both meta-analyses). One trial assessing 71 participants compared chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone and found no significant difference between the two groups (HR = 1.34; 95%CI: 0.24 to 7.66). The median follow up of patients varied from 29 to 42 months. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The addition of platinum-based chemotherapy to radiotherapy may offer clinical benefit in the adjuvant treatment of early stage cervical cancer with risk factors for recurrence. However, the evidence is limited because the selected studies were quantitatively and qualitatively limited, with small number of patients and limited period of follow-up.

Antibody anti-p16(INK4a) in cervical cytology.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of anti-p16(INK4a) in cervical cytology. STUDY DESIGN: A case-control study was conducted in a reference center for cervical pathology. Cytology slides were collected in a standard way with Ayre spatula and Cytobrush. The slides were interpreted by 2 independent pathologists (P1, P2). The cases (n = 61) represented all cervical examinations that had resulted in a biopsy with the diagnosis of CIN 1, 2 or 3 or squamous cell carcinoma. Controls (n = 87) included all examinations with negative cytology (Papanicolaou) and negative colposcopy. RESULTS: The sensitivity for the histologic diagnosis of CIN 2, 3 (n = 23) was 100% and 95.7% (P1, P2), respectively. The NPV for CIN 2 or worse was 100% (P1) and 98.9% (P2). The sensitivity for the diagnosis of CIN 1 was 77.8% (P1) and 58.3% (P2). The NPV for CIN 1 or worse was 90.6% (P1) and 82% (P2). The K index between the 2 pathologists was 0.74. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the antibody anti-p16(INK4a) could contribute as an adjuvant tool in the follow-up of cervical intraepithelial lesions when the cytology sample is collected in the standard way.

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour.

BACKGROUND: Over the last 10 years laparoscopy and minilaparotomy have become increasingly common approaches for the surgical removal of benign ovarian tumours. However, in the event that a tumour is found to be malignant, laparotomy is the appropriate procedure. Careful preoperative assessment including transvaginal ultrasound with morphological scoring, colour doppler assessment of vascular quality, and serum cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) level is desirable. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits, harms, and cost of laparoscopy or minilaparotomy compared with laparotomy in women with benign ovarian tumours. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched electronic databases, trial registers, and reference lists of published trial reports. Reference lists from trials and review articles were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials comparing either laparoscopy or minilaparotomy with laparotomy for benign ovarian tumours. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eight review authors independently assessed the eligibility and quality of each study and extracted the data. MAIN RESULTS: The results of nine randomised controlled trials (N = 482 women) showed that laparoscopic surgery was associated with fewer adverse events of surgery (surgical injury or postoperative complications including fever or infection) (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.5), less postoperative pain (VAS score WMD -2.4, 95% CI -2.7 to -2.0), greater likelihood of being pain free after two days (OR 7.42, 95% CI 4.86 to 11.33), and fewer days in hospital (WMD -2.88, 95% CI -3.1 to -2.7) than with laparotomy.In one study that reported costs, laparoscopy was associated with a significant reduction in costs compared to laparotomy (WMD - USD 1045, 95% CI -1348 to -742) in 1993. Very high levels of heterogeneity made it inappropriate to pool data on duration of surgery.Three RCTs compared laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy and found that laparoscopy was associated with reduced odds of any adverse event (surgical injury or postoperative complications) (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0 to 0.8) and lower VAS scores for pain (WMD -1.0, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.45). Duration of hospital stay ranged between 1 and 2.2 days, with substantial heterogeneity. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In women undergoing surgery for benign ovarian tumours, laparoscopy was associated with a reduction in fever, urinary tract infection, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, number of days in hospital, and total cost. These findings should be interpreted with caution since only a small number of studies were identified. These included a total of only 769 women and not all of the important outcomes were reported in each study.

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for FIGO Stage I ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Over the past ten years laparoscopy has become an increasingly common approach for the surgical removal of early stage ovarian tumours. There remains uncertainty about the value of this intervention. This review has been undertaken to assess the available evidence of the benefits and harms of laparoscopic surgery for the management of early stage ovarian cancer compared to laparotomy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of FIGO stage I ovarian cancer (stages Ia, Ib and Ic) when compared with laparotomy. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2007, MEDLINE (January 1990 to November 2007), EMBASE (1990 to November 2007), LILACS (1990 to November 2007), BIOLOGICAL ABSTRACTS (1990 to November 2007) and Cancerlit (1990 to November 2007). We also searched our own publication archives, based on prospective handsearching of relevant journals from November 2007. Reference lists of identified studies, gynaecological cancer handbooks and conference abstract were also scanned. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies including patients with histologically proven stage I ovarian cancer according to the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO).Studies comparing laparoscopic surgery with laparotomy for early stage ovarian cancer were only available from 1990. It was anticipated that a very small number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted studying the management of early stage ovarian cancer. Therefore, non-randomised comparative studies, cohort studies and case-controls studies, but not studies with historical controls, were also considered. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction was performed independently by five review authors (LRM, DDR, MIR, MCB and MIE) who assessed study quality and quality of extracted data. Extracted data included trial characteristics, characteristics of the study participants, interventions and outcomes. The quality of non RCTs was assessed using appropriate quality evaluations tools from the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) and from the Newcastle-Ottawa tool for observational studies (NOS). MAIN RESULTS: No RCTs were identified. Three observational studies were identified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review has found no evidence to help quantify the value of laparoscopy for the management of early stage ovarian cancer as routine clinical practice.

Persistence and clearance of human papillomavirus infection: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify epidemiological correlates for persistence and clearance of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. STUDY DESIGN: Cervical smears collected in a prospective cohort study to perform Papanicoloau cytology and HPV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) detection at baseline and during the follow-up. Outcomes analyzed were: (1) persistence of HPV DNA; (2) conversion; and (3) clearance of HPV. RESULTS: Among 501 women the incidence of HPV was 12.3%. Thirty-four women were persistently infected with HPV, which was associated with age below 21 years at first intercourse and 4 or more sexual partners during their lifetime. In a median of 19 months, 80.7% of women had clearance of HPV, which was associated with black race, coinfection with Chlamydia trachomatis at baseline, and a history of previous Papanicoloau smear. CONCLUSION: Strategies for sexual orientation may modify the rates of HPV persistence. The association of HPV clearance with a history of previous Papanicolaou smear screening highlights the importance of improving cervical screening programs. Further studies on the association of gynecological infections with HPV clearance are needed.

Neutrophil apoptosis: a marker of disease severity in sepsis and sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Apoptosis of neutrophils (polymorphonuclear neutrophils [PMNs]) may limit inflammatory injury in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the relationship between the severity of sepsis and extent of PMN apoptosis and the effect of superimposed ARDS is unknown. The objective of this study was to correlate neutrophil apoptosis with the severity of sepsis and sepsis-induced ARDS. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in intensive care units of three tertiary hospitals in Porto Alegre, southern Brazil. Fifty-seven patients with sepsis (uncomplicated sepsis, septic shock, and sepsis-induced ARDS) and 64 controls were enrolled. Venous peripheral blood was collected from patients with sepsis within 24 hours of diagnosis. All surgical groups, including controls, had their blood drawn 24 hours after surgery. Control patients on mechanical ventilation had blood collected within 24 hours of initiation of mechanical ventilation. Healthy controls were blood donors. Neutrophils were isolated, and incubated ex vivo, and apoptosis was determined by light microscopy on cytospun preparations. The differences among groups were assessed by analysis of variance with Tukeys. RESULTS: In medical patients, the mean percentage of neutrophil apoptosis (+/- standard error of the mean [SEM]) was lower in sepsis-induced ARDS (28% +/- 3.3%; n = 9) when compared with uncomplicated sepsis (57% +/- 3.2%; n = 8; p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation without infection, sepsis, or ARDS (53% +/- 3.0%; n = 11; p < 0.001) and healthy controls (69% +/- 1.1%; n = 33; p < 0.001) but did not differ from septic shock (38% +/- 3.7%; n = 12; p = 0.13). In surgical patients with sepsis, the percentage of neutrophil apoptosis was lower for all groups when compared with surgical controls (52% +/- 3.6%; n = 11; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In medical patients with sepsis, neutrophil apoptosis is inversely proportional to the severity of sepsis and thus may be a marker of the severity of sepsis in this population.

Chronic stress, depression, and cortisol levels as risk indicators of elevated plaque and gingivitis levels in individuals aged 50 years and older.

BACKGROUND: The role of psychoneuroimmunological factors in oral hygiene has been overlooked in the dental literature. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of stress, depression, and cortisol levels in dental plaque accumulation and gingivitis in a population of individuals aged >or=50 years. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 230 subjects, selected from caregivers of demented patient groups and from social activities groups of Porto Alegre, Brazil, were evaluated. Stress was evaluated with the Lipp stress inventory, whereas depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck depression inventory. Three saliva samples (at 8, 12, and 20 hours) were collected for cortisol analysis by means of radioimmunoassay. Cortisol levels were expressed as the area under the curve of the three samples for each patient. Multivariate logistic regression was performed with the visible plaque index and gingival bleeding index as outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 61.6 +/- 8.2 years, mean monthly income in United States dollars (US dollars) was US 668 +/- 590, and mean cortisol level was 22.1 +/- 33.7 nmol/l. A total of 51.5% of the individuals were caregivers; 9.4% were smokers, and 25.5% used interdental floss/brush. Being a caregiver (odds ratio [OR] = 3.97; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 2.08 to 7.54), using an interdental brush (OR = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.47), cortisol (OR = 2.03; 95% CI = 1.09 to 3.81), and stress (OR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.02) were all significantly associated with visible plaque index >mean (43%). Being a caregiver (OR = 2.35; 95% CI = 1.13 to 4.86), using an interdental brush (OR = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.77), smoking (OR = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.89), stress (OR = 1.78; 95% CI =1.31 to 2.38), and visible plaque index (mean) (OR = 12.87; 95% CI = 6.29 to 26.31) were significantly associated with a gingival bleeding index > mean (37%). CONCLUSION: Stress was a significant risk indicator of elevated levels of plaque and gingivitis, whereas cortisol was a risk indicator of plaque in the sample after controlling for confounders.

Mortalidade neonatal precoce no município de Caxias do Sul: um estudo de coorte / Early neonatal mortality in Caxias do Sul: a cohort study

Objetivo: Estabelecer o perfil dos neonatos de Caxias do Sul e estudar a mortalidade neonatal precoce, suas causas e as variáveis a esta relacionadas. Métodos: Estudo de coorte envolvendo 5.545 recém-nascidos acompanhados por até 7 dias de vida. Calculou-se a probalidade de morte neonatal precoce (PMNP), utilizando-se a regressão logística múltipla para relacionar as vaiáveis com a mortalidade neonatal precoce. Resultados: A PMNP observada foi de 7,44 por mil nascidos vivos. A incidência de partos prematuros e de baixo peso ao nascer foi de 9,4 por cento e 8,1 por cento, respectivamente. O índice de cesariana foi de 55 por cento, apresentando relação com o nível socioeconômico e educacional. As variáveis realcionadas ao óbito foram a história de natimortalidade, a idade materna >35 anos, idade gestacional, Apgar <7, sexo masculino e baixo peso. A principal causa do óbito foi a doença da membrana hialina, seguida pelas cardiopatias congênitas, prematuridade extrema e descolamento prematuro de placenta. Conclusão: Apesar da PMNP ter sido baixa, ocorreram mortes que poderiam ter sido evitadas com um melhor atendimento no pré-natal, no parto e na assistência ao RN

Validaçào de escalas diagnósticas do funcionamento familiar para utilizaçào em serviços de atençào primaria a saúde / Validation of diagnostic scales of family functioning for use in primary health care services

O atendimento a pacientes em servicos primarios de saude deveria compreender uma avaliacao tanto fisica como psicologica; em muitos casos, o sucesso do tratamento depende da compreensao do individuo e de suas interacoes, em especial de sua interacao na familia. Portanto, e importante instrumentalizar os profissionais de saude para que sejam capazes de trabalhar com os individuos nesse contexto social. Estudamos tres escalas diagnosticas do funcionamento familiar consagradas na literatura internacional (FACES III, Beavers-Timberlawn e GARF), procurando valida-las para uso em nosso meio (Porto Alegre, Brasil). Comparamos os resultados do preenchimento das escalas com a avaliacao clinica, feita atraves de entrevista familiar semi-estruturada, em 31 familias clinicas. A escala auto-respondida FACES III tambem foi testada em 102 familias na comunidade. A escala FACES III mostrou uma correlacao linear positiva, porem fraca, entre coesao familiar e risco para doenca mental, mas nao em relacao a adaptabilidade. As escalas BT e GARF demonstraram forte correlacao positiva com a avaliacao clinica. A escala FACES III nao demonstrou ser adequada para uso em triagem de cuidados primarios; entretanto, as escalas BT e GARF mostratam-se muito uteis na formulacao e classificacao do diagnostico familiar

Validação de escalas diagnosticas do funcionamento familiar para utilização em serviços de atenção primaria a saude / Validation of diagnostic scales of family functioning for use in primary health care services

O atendimento a pacientes em servicos primarios de saude deveria compreender uma avaliacao tanto fisica como psicologica; em muitos casos, o sucesso do tratamento depende da compreensao do individuo e de suas interacoes, em especial de sua interacao na familia. Portanto, e importante instrumentalizar os profissionais de saude para que sejam capazes de trabalhar com os individuos nesse contexto social. Estudamos tres escalas diagnosticas do funcionamento familiar consagradas na literatura internacional (FACES III, Beavers-Timberlawn e GARF), procurando valida-las para uso em nosso meio (Porto Alegre, Brasil). Comparamos os resultados do preenchimento das escalas com a avaliacao clinica, feita atraves de entrevista familiar semi-estruturada, em 31 familias clinicas. A escala auto-respondida FACES III tambem foi testada em 102 familias na comunidade. A escala FACES III mostrou uma correlacao linear positiva, porem fraca, entre coesao familiar e risco para doenca mental, mas nao em relacao a adaptabilidade. As escalas BT e GARF demonstraram forte correlacao positiva com a avaliacao clinica. A escala FACES III nao demonstrou ser adequada para uso em triagem de cuidados primarios; entretanto, as escalas BT e GARF mostratam-se muito uteis na formulacao e classificacao do diagnostico familiar

Care provided to patients in primary health services should include both a physical and a psychological assessment. In many cases treatment success depends on understanding individuals and their interactions, especially within the family; it is important for health professionals to be trained in this area. We investigated the validity of three well-known diagnostic scales of family functioning from the United States of America (FACES III, Beavers-Timberlawn, and GARF) for use in our setting in Porto Alegre, Brazil. The three scales were used with 31 families and compared to the results from clinical evaluations (semistructured family interviews), which were considered the gold standard. FACES III was also used with a sample of 102 families in the community. The Beavers-Timberlawn and GARF scales were strongly and positively correlated with the clinical evaluations. In contrast, our results suggest that FACES III is not a useful screening tool in primary care to detect the risk of psychiatric disorders. The Beavers-Timberlawn and GARF instruments showed great usefulness for formulating and classifying diagnoses of family functioning.