ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mental health is a public health priority among chronic diseases in France and the United States. Although there is room for progress in France, the experience of Intermountain Healthcare (IH), Utah, in the United States can provide convincing experimental data. AIM: To identify the lessons learned from IH clinical integration of mental health specialists in primary care practices called "Mental Health Integration" (MHI) which might be useful in France. METHODS: This research is based on qualitative analysis of data derived from collaborative work with IH experts, literature searches, and item queries on the 3 objectives of the Triple Aim of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). RESULTS: The MHI programme was developed to achieve IHI T riple AIM: improving user satisfaction; improving access of care and the health of the population; reducing health care costs per capita. By integrating mental health specialists within a multidisciplinary team headed by primary care physicians and working under the same roof with care managers and support staff, the MHI model enhances the process of the Chronic Care Model. Furthermore MHI has become the foundation for team-based care centered on the patient and theirfamily over the continuum of care by offering a global and structured evidenced-based care process. Prevention and integration of specialized care have been developed. Users and their families are co-responsible for their health. Discussion: Evaluation is systematic and based on specific indicators. The efficiency and clinical and organizational effectiveness created generate savings for health insurance as well as improved access to care and health equality.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Mental Disorders/therapy , France/epidemiology , Humans , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Models, Organizational , Organizational Case Studies , Physicians, Primary Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , Triage/methods , Triage/organization & administration , United States/epidemiology , Utah/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To administer a social handicap questionnaire associated with French DRGs (PMSI) to determine the social handicaps of a population hospitalized in a public health establishment and to measure the cost implications for the establishment due to increased length of stay (DMS). METHOD: A prospective pilot study has been carried out in the Lariboisière-Fernand Widal Hospital Group in Paris targeting users 50 or more years old hospitalized for short stays in medicine, surgery and obstetrics. Data of the PMSI and answers to the questionnaire for hospitalisations longer than 24 hours have been exploited. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two stays from 8 to 23 November 2005 have been analyzed: 140 pertained to patients aged 50-69 years (27.8%) and 82 to patients aged 70 or more years (16.3%). Three-fourths of the persons aged 50-69 and 70 or over presented a social handicap: 45% showed a strong handicap and a third an average handicap. The three indicators "renter/owner", "interior comfort" and "family relations" were the major determinants of social handicap for those aged 70 or more, 50-69 and 50 or more years. For the patients 70 years and over and those 50-69 years, with an average handicap, the indicator was "income" with the domain "patrimony." For strong handicaps, it was the indicator "scolarisation" for the 70 or more years and the indicator "income" for the 50-69 years old. When all classes and populations were pooled, the DMS was significantly lower than that of the ENC (p<0.001 for the 70 years and over; p<0.05 for the 50-69 years). With again all classes and populations pooled, patients 70 and over stayed in hospital 6.50 days less on average compared to data published by the ENC; those 50-69 years stayed 3.57 days less. Persons aged 50 and over with a social handicap remained hospitalized on average more than 2.5 days: 2.2 days for the 70 and over and 3.1 days for the 50-69 years group. In terms of hospital days that produces an increase of 18%, corresponding to a supplementary expenditure attributable to social handicap of approximately 5.9 million euros. CONCLUSION: This pilot study with a questionnaire disability social PMSI proposing specific aid, but also reducing the DMS, provides several promising information but also indicates the limits of our approach. Among these, we note in particular: (a) its regular feasibility requires constant supervision, wider and well-trained, (b) that the measurement of our tool can only be affirmed after its use in many patients, and (c) the classification of disability in social class could even be discussed again. We still wanted to explore whether through this initiative without much logistical, markers of interest had emerged, which seems to be the case.
