Mu-Net a Light Architecture for Small Dataset Segmentation of Brain Organoid Bright-Field Images.

To characterize the growth of brain organoids (BOs), cultures that replicate some early physiological or pathological developments of the human brain are usually manually extracted. Due to their novelty, only small datasets of these images are available, but segmenting the organoid shape automatically with deep learning (DL) tools requires a larger number of images. Light U-Net segmentation architectures, which reduce the training time while increasing the sensitivity under small input datasets, have recently emerged. We further reduce the U-Net architecture and compare the proposed architecture (MU-Net) with U-Net and UNet-Mini on bright-field images of BOs using several data augmentation strategies. In each case, we perform leave-one-out cross-validation on 40 original and 40 synthesized images with an optimized adversarial autoencoder (AAE) or on 40 transformed images. The best results are achieved with U-Net segmentation trained on optimized augmentation. However, our novel method, MU-Net, is more robust: it achieves nearly as accurate segmentation results regardless of the dataset used for training (various AAEs or a transformation augmentation). In this study, we confirm that small datasets of BOs can be segmented with a light U-Net method almost as accurately as with the original method.

Brain organoid data synthesis and evaluation.

Introduction: Datasets containing only few images are common in the biomedical field. This poses a global challenge for the development of robust deep-learning analysis tools, which require a large number of images. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are an increasingly used solution to expand small datasets, specifically in the biomedical domain. However, the validation of synthetic images by metrics is still controversial and psychovisual evaluations are time consuming. Methods: We augment a small brain organoid bright-field database of 40 images using several GAN optimizations. We compare these synthetic images to the original dataset using similitude metrcis and we perform an psychovisual evaluation of the 240 images generated. Eight biological experts labeled the full dataset (280 images) as syntetic or natural using a custom-built software. We calculate the error rate per loss optimization as well as the hesitation time. We then compare these results to those provided by the similarity metrics. We test the psychovalidated images in a training step of a segmentation task. Results and discussion: Generated images are considered as natural as the original dataset, with no increase of the hesitation time by experts. Experts are particularly misled by perceptual and Wasserstein loss optimization. These optimizations render the most qualitative and similar images according to metrics to the original dataset. We do not observe a strong correlation but links between some metrics and psychovisual decision according to the kind of generation. Particular Blur metric combinations could maybe replace the psychovisual evaluation. Segmentation task which use the most psychovalidated images are the most accurate.

Recent Trends and Perspectives in Cerebral Organoids Imaging and Analysis.

Purpose: Since their first generation in 2013, the use of cerebral organoids has spread exponentially. Today, the amount of generated data is becoming challenging to analyze manually. This review aims to overview the current image acquisition methods and to subsequently identify the needs in image analysis tools for cerebral organoids. Methods: To address this question, we went through all recent articles published on the subject and annotated the protocols, acquisition methods, and algorithms used. Results: Over the investigated period of time, confocal microscopy and bright-field microscopy were the most used acquisition techniques. Cell counting, the most common task, is performed in 20% of the articles and area; around 12% of articles calculate morphological parameters. Image analysis on cerebral organoids is performed in majority using ImageJ software (around 52%) and Matlab language (4%). Treatments remain mostly semi-automatic. We highlight the limitations encountered in image analysis in the cerebral organoid field and suggest possible solutions and implementations to develop. Conclusions: In addition to providing an overview of cerebral organoids cultures and imaging, this work highlights the need to improve the existing image analysis methods for such images and the need for specific analysis tools. These solutions could specifically help to monitor the growth of future standardized cerebral organoids.