Free-Hand MIS TLIF without 3D Navigation-How to Achieve Low Radiation Exposure for Both Surgeon and Patient.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is one of the most frequently performed spinal fusion techniques, and this minimally invasive (MIS) approach has advantages over the traditional open approach. A drawback is the higher radiation exposure for the surgeon when conventional fluoroscopy (2D-fluoroscopy) is used. While computer-assisted navigation (CAN) reduce the surgeon's radiation exposure, the patient's exposure is higher. When we investigated 2D-fluoroscopically guided and 3D-navigated MIS TLIF in a randomized controlled trial, we detected low radiation doses for both the surgeon and the patient in the 2D-fluoroscopy group. Therefore, we extended the dataset, and herein, we report the radiation-sparing surgical technique of 2D-fluoroscopy-guided MIS TLIF. METHODS: Monosegmental and bisegmental MIS TLIF was performed on 24 patients in adherence to advanced radiation protection principles and a radiation-sparing surgical protocol. Dedicated dosemeters recorded patient and surgeon radiation exposure. For safety assessment, pedicle screw accuracy was graded according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. RESULTS: In total, 99 of 102 (97.1%) pedicle screws were correctly positioned (Gertzbein grade A/B). No breach caused neurological symptoms or necessitated revision surgery. The effective radiation dose to the surgeon was 41 ± 12 µSv per segment. Fluoroscopy time was 64 ± 34 s and 75 ± 43 radiographic images per segment were performed. Patient radiation doses at the neck, chest, and umbilical area were 65 ± 40, 123 ± 116, and 823 ± 862 µSv per segment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using a dedicated radiation-sparing free-hand technique, 2D-fluoroscopy-guided MIS TLIF is successfully achievable with low radiation exposure to both the surgeon and the patient. With this technique, the maximum annual radiation exposure to the surgeon will not be exceeded, even with workday use.

The Impact of Implementing a Radiation-Sparing Protocol for Percutaneous Kyphoplasty-A Prospective Dosemetric Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate a protocol for radiation-sparing kyphoplasty by assessing dosemetrically recorded radiation exposures to both patient and surgeon. METHODS: This prospective clinical study examines the radiation exposure to patient and surgeon during single-level kyphoplasty in 32 thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral body fractures (12 OF 2, 9 OF 3, 11 OF 4 types) using a radiation aware surgical protocol between May 2017 and November 2019. The radiation exposure was measured at different locations using film, eye lens and ring dosemeters. Dose values are reported under consideration of lower detection limits of each dosemeter type. RESULTS: A high proportion of dosemeter readings was below the lower detection limits, especially for the surgeon (>90%). Radiation exposure to the surgeon was highest at the unprotected thyroid gland (0.053 ± 0.047 mSv), however only slightly above the lower detection limit of dosemeters (0.044 mSv). Radiation exposure to the patient was highest at the chest (0.349 ± 0.414 mSv) and the gonad (0.186 ± 0.262 mSv). Fluoroscopy time, dose area product and number of fluoroscopic images were 46.0 ± 17.9 sec, 124 ± 109 cGy×cm2, and 35 ± 13 per kyphoplasty, respectively. Back pain significantly improved from 6.8 ± 1.6 to 2.5 ± 1.7 on the numeric rating scale on the first postoperative day (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a strict intraoperative radiation protection protocol allows for safely performed kyphoplasty with ultra-low radiation exposure for the patient and surgeon without exceeding the annual occupational dose limits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00011908, registration date 16/05/2017).

Radiation Exposure to Scrub Nurse, Assistant Surgeon, and Anesthetist in Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery Comparing 2D Conventional Fluoroscopy With 3D Fluoroscopy-based Navigation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the radiation exposure with the scrub nurse, assistant surgeon, and anesthetist during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using conventional 2-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy or 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive spinal fusion techniques are related to higher radiation exposures compared with open techniques. Especially the routinely exposed surgical staff faces the risks of increased radiation exposure. METHODS: In total, 41 patients with planned monosegmental minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion were randomized into the intraoperative imaging techniques 2D fluoroscopy or 3D navigation. Eye lens and film dosemeters were attached to defined locations of the scrub nurse, assistant surgeon, and anesthetist. Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon-matched pairs signed-rank test were used to compare dosemeter readings. This study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00004514). RESULTS: The radiation exposure per surgery was low for the scrub nurse, assistant surgeon, and anesthetist in both the 2D fluoroscopy and 3D navigation groups. The maximum average value of 0.057±0.031 mSv was measured on the unprotected chest of the assistant surgeon and was thus slightly above the lower detection limit of the dosemeters (0.044 mSv). The annual occupational dose limit would be exceeded at the earliest after 571 operations for the unprotected eye lens of the assistant surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery is possible with comparatively low radiation exposure to the assisting operating room personnel without exceeding the annual maximum occupational radiation exposure. However, there is no definite dose value below which ionizing radiation poses no risk. Consequently, radiation sparing work routines should be strictly followed.

Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Conventional Fluoroscopy and 3D Fluoroscopy-based Navigation.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the dosemetrically determined radiation exposure of surgeon and patient during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) using conventional 2D fluoroscopy (FLUORO) or 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation (NAV). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MIS TLIF was shown to exhibit higher radiation exposures compared to open techniques. In particular, the routinely exposed surgeon encounters the risks of increased radiation doses. With the additional use of intraoperative 3D navigation, major steps of the operation can be performed without exposing the operating room staff to ionizing radiation. METHODS: Forty-four patients undergoing monosegmental MIS TLIF were randomized into the two intraoperative imaging technique groups (FLUORO or NAV). The primary endpoint was the radiation exposure of the surgeon; the secondary endpoints were the radiation exposure of the patient and C-arm readings. RESULTS: After exclusion of three patients, 41 patients were analyzed. In general, the average radiation exposure of the surgeon was lower in the NAV group without being statistically significant. The radiation exposure of the patient was significantly higher in the NAV group at all dosemeter sites. The average fluoroscopy time was 63 ±â€Š36 versus 109 ±â€Š31 sec (FLUORO versus NAV group, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The additional use of intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation compared to conventional 2D fluoroscopy alone showed a nonsignificant reduction of the radiation exposure of the surgeon in monosegmental MIS TLIF, while increasing the radiation exposure of the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.

Radiation exposure of a mobile 3D C-arm with large flat-panel detector for intraoperative imaging and navigation - an experimental study using an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative 3-dimensional (3D) navigation is increasingly being used for pedicle screw placement. For this purpose, dedicated mobile 3D C-arms are capable of providing intraoperative fluoroscopy-based 3D image data sets. Modern 3D C-arms have a large field of view, which suggests a higher radiation exposure. In this experimental study we therefore investigate the radiation exposure of a new mobile 3D C-arm with large flat-panel detector to a previously reported device with regular flat-panel detector on an Alderson phantom. METHODS: We measured the radiation exposure of the Vision RFD 3D (large 30 × 30 cm detector) while creating 3D image sets as well as standard fluoroscopic images of the cervical and lumbar spine using an Alderson phantom. The dosemeter readings were then compared with the radiation exposure of the previous model Vision FD Vario 3D (smaller 20 × 20 cm detector), which had been examined identically in advance and published elsewhere. RESULTS: The larger 3D C-arm induced lower radiation exposures at all dosemeter sites in cervical 3D scans as well as at the sites of eye lenses and thyroid gland in lumbar 3D scans. At ​​male and especially female gonads in lumbar 3D scans, however, the larger 3D C-arm showed higher radiation exposures compared with the smaller 3D C-arm. In lumbar fluoroscopic images, the dosemeters near/in the radiation field measured a higher radiation exposure using the larger 3D C-arm. CONCLUSIONS: The larger 3D C-arm offers the possibility to reduce radiation exposures for specific applications despite its larger flat-panel detector with a larger field of view. However, due to the considerably higher radiation exposure of the larger 3D C-arm during lumbar 3D scans, the smaller 3D C-arm is to be recommended for short-distance instrumentations (mono- and bilevel) from a radiation protection point of view. The larger 3D C-arm with its enlarged 3D image set might be used for long instrumentations of the lumbar spine. From a radiation protection perspective, the use of the respective 3D C-arm should be based on the presented data and the respective application.

Assessing the level of radiation experienced by anesthesiologists during transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and protection by a lead cap.

OBJECTIVE: Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has become a standard therapy for patients with aortic valve stenosis. Fluoroscopic imaging is essential for TAVI with the anesthesiologist's workplace close to patient's head side. While the use of lead-caps has been shown to be useful for interventional cardiologists, data are lacking for anesthesiologists. METHODS: A protective cap with a 0.35 lead-equivalent was worn on 15 working days by one anesthesiologist. Six detectors (three outside, three inside) were analyzed to determine the reduction of radiation. Literature search was conducted between April and October 2018. RESULTS: In the observational period, 32 TAVI procedures were conducted. A maximum radiation dose of 0.55 mSv was detected by the dosimeters at the outside of the cap. The dosimeters inside the cap, in contrast, displayed a constant radiation dose of 0.08 mSv. CONCLUSION: The anesthesiologist's head is exposed to significant radiation during TAVI and it can be protected by wearing a lead-cap.