ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Progressive disease in patients with high-grade glioma may be reflected in cognitive decline. However, the cognitive functions most sensitive to progression may differ between patients. We investigated whether decline on a personalized selection of tests predicted progressive disease according to RANO criteria in high-grade glioma patients. METHODS: Starting one day before surgery, patients underwent neuropsychological assessment every three months during standard treatment and clinical follow-up. We first made a personalized selection of three tests that showed the highest Reliable Change Index (RCI) values, i.e., most positive change, at the first post-surgical assessment for each patient. In subsequent follow up, a decline of RCI ≤ - 1 on at least two of the three tests in the selection was considered cognitive decline. We performed a discrete Cox proportional hazards model including a time-dependent coefficient cognitive decline (vs. stability) and covariate age to predict progressive disease. RESULTS: Twenty five patients were included. Cognitive decline on the personalized test selection preceded or had occurred by the time progression was established in 9/15 patients with RANO confirmed progressive disease (60%). Decline was absent in 8/10 patients (80%) with stable disease during participation. The independent hazard ratio for progression in case of cognitive decline was 5.05 (p < 0.01) compared to stable performance. CONCLUSIONS: Using only three patient-specific neuropsychological tests, we found a fivefold increased chance of disease progression in case of cognitive decline as compared to stable performance. Brief, patient-tailored cognitive assessment may be a noninvasive addition to disease monitoring without overburdening patients and clinical care.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Glioma/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Precision Medicine , Risk Assessment/methods , Adult , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/psychology , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glioma/pathology , Glioma/psychology , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Pain has been studied more intensely as a symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) in recent years. However, studies on the characteristics and prevalence of pain in PD have yielded conflicting results, prompting us to do a systematic review of the literature. A systematic review of the literature was conducted, using different databases. The last inclusion date was March 15, 2011. The modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool was used, which is especially designed for judging prevalence studies on their methodological quality. Only articles that met the predefined criteria were used in this review. We found 18 articles, of which only 8 met the methodological criteria. Prevalence frequency ranges from 40% to 85% with a mean of 67.6%. Pain is most frequently located in the lower limbs, with almost one-half of all PD patients complaining about musculoskeletal pain (46.4%). The pain fluctuates with on-off periods. Surprisingly, only 52.4% of PD patients with pain used analgesics, most often nonopioids. PD patients seem to be predisposed to develop pain and physicians should be aware of pain as a common feature of PD. As many as one-half of PD patients with pain may be missing out on a potentially useful treatment, and proper treatment could increase quality of life in PD patients.
