Pollutional and meteorological factors are closely related to complaints of non-allergic, non-infectious perennial rhinitis patients: a time series model.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies in the past have focused on meteorological conditions, pollution and pollen and their relationship with symptoms of bronchial hyper-reactivity, however, there are no epidemiological studies which examine a wide range of such factors and determine their role in nasal hyper-reactivity. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether environmental factors can influence symptomatology in non-allergic non-infectious perennial rhinitis (NANIPER) patients, who suffer primarily from nasal hyper-reactivity symptoms. METHODS: We studied 16 non-smoking NANIPER patients and seven non-smoking controls during a 218-day study period (March-October) by means of daily symptom scores and visual analogue scales for the subsets patency, secretions and sneezing, and compared them to seven primary factors which affected 'symptoms' and 10 secondary factors which affected primary factors only. RESULTS: The mean symptom scores in the NANIPER and control groups were 2.17 and 0.13, respectively. In NANIPER, the highest correlations of primary factors with symptomatology were found for symptom scores and sneezing with minimum daytime temperature (r = -0.62 and -0.45, respectively), ozone and NO concentrations. Patency and secretions were associated with minimum daytime temperature (r = -0.39 and 0.32, respectively). Time series analysis, however, correcting for several confounders such as autocorrelated symptomatology, showed that minimum daytime temperature and daytime relative humidity made an independent contribution to symptoms. In the control group, correlations were much lower, though present. Time series analysis was not possible. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in a mild climate with relatively low levels of pollution, minor pollution and meteorological disturbances result in substantial changes in nasal reactivity symptoms in NANIPER patients, but not controls, irrespective of other factors such as allergy or infection.

Forced expiration through the nose is a stimulus for NANIPER but not for controls.

OBJECTIVE: Is forced expiration through the nose a mechanical stimulus to which patients with nasal hyperreactivity react? Do parameters, such as peak nasal expiratory flow rate (PNEF), influence nasal airway resistance (NAR) in these patients? METHOD: NAR, mucus production and sneezing were measured on 2 occasions two weeks apart. Measurements were conducted before and during a period of 10 minutes after 3 repeated PNEFs in 15 non-allergic non-infectious perennial rhinitis (NANIPER) patients suffering from nasal hyperreactivity, and in 15 controls. RESULTS: In NANIPER versus controls PNEF measurements attributed to a statistically significant increase in NAR. The main effect was within the first minute after stimulus, suggesting a neuronal mechanism. Mucus secretions and sneezing were hardly present. PNEF (highest of 3) and bronchial peak expiratory flow rate (BpEFR) are lower in NANIPER than controls but are correlated. Impaired bronchial capacity is likely to influence PNEF, resulting in a lower decrease of nasal patency. CONCLUSION: PNEF depends on BpEFR and is an adequate mechanical stimulus for NANIPER patients, but not for non-rhinitic controls, resulting in a brief increase in NAR.

The effect of intranasal and inhaled corticosteroids in healthy volunteers on the number of circulating lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets.

BACKGROUND: There has been an increasing interest in the potential systemic effects of inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: The effect of locally inhaled corticosteroids in the nose and lung on blood lymphocytes was measured in two studies. In the first study, budesonide (BUD) (200 and 800 microg), fluticasone propionate (FP) (200 and 800 microg), and placebo were administered in the nose, and BUD (1600 microg) and FP (1500 microg) were inhaled into the lungs in a blinded, randomized fashion by 12 healthy volunteers. Blood samples were taken before and 4 h after the administration of the drug, and total lymphocyte count and different subpopulations were determined. In the second study, 15 healthy volunteers were randomized to BUD (1600 microg), FP (1600 microg), or placebo inhaled into the lungs. Blood samples were taken before and 4, 8, 24, 48, and 148 h (=7 days) after inhalation of the medication. RESULTS: Neither the nasal applications nor the inhalation of FP (1500 microg/1600 microg) showed significant differences in total lymphocyte count or different subpopulations between baseline and 4 h after the administration. In both studies, a significant reduction was found in the total lymphocyte count, B cells, T cells, and the CD4+ and the CD8+ fractions 4 h after application of BUD 1600 microg. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal application of BUD or FP in doses up to 800 microg do not induce lymphopenia. BUD 1600 microg inhalation in the lung reduces lymphocytes and their subfractions. Further studies have to be done to determine whether the results obtained in this study in healthy volunteers will also be found in patients with diseased mucosa and whether there is any correlation with adverse effects such as growth inhibition or osteoporosis.

Intranasal cold dry air is superior to histamine challenge in determining the presence and degree of nasal hyperreactivity in nonallergic noninfectious perennial rhinitis.

The objective of the study was to compare cold dry air (CDA) and histamine in differentiating patients with nonallergic noninfectious perennial rhinitis (NANIPER) from control subjects. Nasal reactivity (nasal patency, mucus production, and sneezing) in 16 symptomatic nonsmoking patients with NANIPER and seven nonsmoking control subjects was measured with standardized CDA and histamine provocation series in a randomized crossover study. Intranasal CDA resulted in increased mucus production and nasal blockage in a dose-dependent manner in patients with NANIPER but not in control subjects. Sneezing did not occur. The reproducibility of CDA for patency and mucus production was good. Sensitivity for CDA was 87% compared with 100% for histamine. However, specificity was 71% for CDA and 0% for histamine. It is concluded that the new standardized intranasal CDA provocation method uses a recognizable natural nonspecific stimulus and seems to be more suitable than histamine for characterizing and assessing the presence and degree of nasal reactivity in NANIPER.

The lack of effect of benzalkonium chloride on the cilia of the nasal mucosa in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a combined functional, light, scanning and transmission electron microscopy study.

BACKGROUND: Controversy still exists about the effect of 0.02% benzalkonium chloride (BKC), a preservative in many nasal sprays, on human nasal epithelium in vivo. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety of BKC by assessing its effect on the function and morphology of cilia of human nasal epithelium. METHODS: A single-centre, double-blind nasal biopsy study in 22 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis, receiving fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) containing BKC, BKC plus placebo or placebo alone for 6 weeks. Before, at two weekly intervals during treatment and 2 weeks after treatment ceased an indigocarmine saccharine transport time (ICST) was performed. RESULTS: ICST results did not significantly vary between the groups. There was no statistical relationship between the number of ciliated cells present and the treatment the patients received. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy examination showed no effects of BKC. CONCLUSION: Despite reports of its ciliostatic effects in vitro, BKC did not have such an effect when it was applied for 6 weeks (with/without fluticasone propionate) to the nasal mucosa of perennial allergic rhinitis patients in vivo.