Metronomic Oral Vinorelbine: An Alternative Schedule in Elderly and Patients PS2 With Local/Advanced and Metastatic NSCLC Not Oncogene-addicted.

BACKGROUND: The MILES and ELVIS studies showed that vinorelbine is one of the best options for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC). Oral vinorelbine at standard schedule (60-80 mg/m2/weekly) has good activity in terms of response rates and progression-free survival. In recent years, a metronomic schedule of oral vinorelbine (40-50 mg/m2 three times a week, continuously) has been studied in phase II trials, especially in unfit and elderly patients. In the MOVE trial metronomic oral vinorelbine had a clinical benefit [partial response (PR)+stable disease (SD) >12 weeks] in 58.1% of patients with mild toxicity. On this basis, in 2017 we started a phase II study with metronomic oral vinorelbine in elderly (over 70 years) or unfit [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG-PS) of 2] patients with locally/advanced and metastatic NSCLC. Primary aims were clinical benefit (PR+SD ≥6 months) and toxicity; secondary aims were progression-free survival and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 25 patients entered the study: 11 with local/advanced and 14 with metastatic NSCLC (five squamous and 20 adenocarcinoma). None of the patients had epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation, or programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) expression; those with squamous carcinoma did not have PDL1 expression. The median age was 79 (range=44-90) years. The PS was 0 in 12 patients (48%), 1 in four patients (16%) and 2 in nine patients (36%). Oral vinorelbine was administered at 40 mg three times a week continuously. RESULTS: Clinical benefit was achieved in eight patients (32%). Objective responses were partial response in two patients (8%), stable disease in seven (28%), progressive disease in nine (36%); seven patients were not evaluable for response (28%). Median progression-free survival was 2 months; median overall survival was 4 months but four out of eight patients with clinical benefit were still alive at 18 months. Overall survival at 1 year was 32%. Toxicity was mild: only one patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia, one grade 3 peripheral neuropathy, four grade 2 asthenia, one grade 2 mucositis, and one grade 2 diarrhoea. The dose needed to be reduced to 30 mg/m2/three times a week in three patients. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed the activity and safety of metronomic oral vinorelbine in patients with wild-type local/advanced and metastatic NSCLC unsuitable for treatment with standard i.v. chemotherapy, allowing patients a comfortable home-based therapy, thereby avoiding frequent hospital visits.

How to improve the identification of patients with cancer eligible for genetic counselling?

OBJECTIVE: International guidelines recommend genetic counselling and if indicated the genetic testing for treatment, disease prevention and follow-up for patients and their relatives. However, there is limited utilisation of genetic counselling. This study aimed to verify whether an individual semi-structured guideline-based interview improves the identification of patients eligible for genetic counselling. METHODS: Unselected patients with cancer were interviewed. A dedicated nurse provided an ad-hoc guideline-based questionnaire to assess the presence of criteria for a possible hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (Lynch syndrome). The interest of patients to undergo genetic counselling was also investigated. RESULTS: Ninety patients were enrolled in the study; 20 (22.2%) of these had already undergone genetic counselling. The interview identified 23 (32.8%) of the remaining 70 patients that were eligible for genetic counselling. Two-third of the patients (n = 59) were interested in genetic counselling irrespective of socio-demographic factors or cancer type. A logistic regression analysis for age, gender, parental status, educational level and cancer type did not reveal any independent factor that was associated with patients who had previous genetic counselling. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings suggest that a semi-structured guideline-based interview can substantially improve the identification of patients eligible for genetic counselling.

Expectations and psychological issues before genetic counseling: analysis of distress determinant factors.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (HBOC) are the most common hereditary cancer syndromes in which a genetic test is available. Potential risks associated with testing include psychological harm, emotional distress and insurance problems. METHODS: The aim of the present study is to investigate determinants of distress in a sample of Italian subjects undergoing genetic counseling. Demographic information and psychological distress were assessed by using a self-reported questionnaire and the "Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale" (HAD), before attending the first counseling session. RESULTS: Of the all subjects referred for the first time to our Center (January 2012-June 2013), a total of 227 were eligible (female/male = 174/53) for the survey, 134 (59%) were oncologic patients and of these, 116 received genetic test (36 for HNPCC and 80 for HBOC). The remaining 93 (41%) were healthy subjects referred for suspected familiar history and of this group, 65 subjects performed predictive test in a family with a known pathogenic mutation (53 for HBOC and 12 for HNPCC). Affected subjects had a significantly higher level of anxiety (p = 0.02) and HAD global score (p = 0.01) than healthy ones. There was no difference in HAD score between individuals testing for different syndromes (p = 0.3). In the affected subgroup, there was a significant linear correlation between the HAD anxiety score and how much subjects perceived their disease as hereditary (p = 0.01). Female and younger subjects had higher levels of anxiety (p = 0.05). Also healthy single subjects show more general distress (p = 0.02) than those with a partner. CONCLUSIONS: Greater level of distress identified on females, single and younger subjects.

Correction to: Expectations and psychological issues before genetic counseling: analysis of distress determinant factors.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s13053-020-00142-1.].

A germline missense mutation in exon 3 of the MSH2 gene in a Lynch syndrome family: correlation with phenotype and localization assay.

Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations in any of the MisMatch Repair (MMR) genes. About 37% of MSH2 variants are missense variants causing single amino-acid substitutions. Whether missense variants affect the normal function of MMR proteins is crucial both to provide affected families a more accurate risk assessment and to offer predictive testing to family members. Here we report one family, fulfilling both Amsterdam I and II criteria and Bethesda guidelines, referred to our center for genetic counselling. The proband and some of her relatives have been investigated for microsatellite instability (MSI), immunohistochemical MMR protein staining, direct sequencing and Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). Also Subcellular Localization Assay and Splice site predictions analyses were used. A germline missense variant of uncertain significance (exon 3, p.Val161Asp) was found in MSH2 gene in proband and in some relatives. The variant was associated with lack of expression of MSH2 protein (DMMR) and MSI-High status in tumour tissues. The localization assay of the MSH2 protein showed an abnormal subcellular localization pattern of the corresponding protein. Finally, splice-site prediction analysis ruled out a potential role of new splice sites as the cause behind the lack of expression of MSH2 protein and we suppose a potential correlation with other forms of post-transcriptional regulation (circular RNAs). The variant here reported shows a high correlation with phenotype and is located in an evolutionary conserved domain. The localization assay also suggest a potential pathogenic role, thus supporting further research on this matter.

Personalization of regorafenib treatment in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours in real-life clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib (REG) has now been approved as the standard third-line therapy in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) patients at the recommended dose and schedule of 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. However, it has a relevant toxicity profile that mainly occurs within the first cycles of therapy, and dose and schedule adjustments are often required to reduce the frequency or severity of adverse events and to avoid early treatment discontinuation. To date, large amounts of data on the use of REG in metastatic GIST patients in daily clinical practice are not available, and we lack information about how this treatment personalization really affects the quality of life (QoL) of patients. The aim of the present retrospective study is to build a comprehensive picture of all alternative REG strategies adopted in daily clinical practice for use in metastatic GIST patients. METHODS: Metastatic GIST patients treated with dose adjustment or alternative schedules of REG at seven reference Italian centres were retrospectively included. RESULTS: For a total of 62 metastatic GIST patients, we confirmed that REG treatment adjustment is common in clinical practice and that it is very heterogeneous, with approximately 20 different strategies being adopted. Independent of which strategy is chosen, treatment personalization has led to a clinical benefit defined as complete or partial resolution of side effects in almost all patients, affecting the duration of REG treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The personalization of REG, even if it is heterogeneous, seems to be crucial to maximize the overall treatment duration.

Mismatch repair deficiency may affect clinical outcome through immune response activation in metastatic gastric cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The microsatellite-instable gastric cancer subtype, because of its supposed high antigenic potential, is a promising candidate for immunotherapy. We analyzed if the presence of a defective mismatch repair (MMR) system is associated with other markers of immune response and their relationship with outcome in advanced gastric cancer patients. METHODS: We analyzed the relationship between clinical outcome and MMR status, the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), lymphocytosis, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in metastatic gastric cancer patients treated with a chemotherapy doublet in the first-line setting. Other stratification factors were sex, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy, metastatic sites, and histotype. RESULTS: One hundred three patients were eligible for analysis. Defective MMR was found in 15 patients (14 %), TILs were found in 18 patients (17 %), lymphocytosis was found in 24 patients (23 %), and high NLR was found in 75 patients (72 %). Significant correlations were found between defective MMR and TIL positivity (p = 0.0004), between defective MMR and lymphocytosis (p = 0.0062), between defective MMR and low NLR (p = 0.000069), and between TIL positivity and lymphocytosis (p = 0.000147). All factors had a statistically significant impact on overall survival, although on multivariate analysis only defective MMR (p = 0.0001) and TIL positivity (p = 0.0192) maintained their independent prognostic role. Similar results were observed for progression-free survival, with defective MMR (p = 0.0001) and TIL positivity (p = 0.0195) maintaining their prognostic role on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis confirms the favorable prognosis of metastatic gastric cancer patients with a defective MMR system and suggests that expression of TILs might also be linked to better outcome. Because of the correlation between defective MMR status and measures of immune system activity, this group of patients would be the best candidates for novel immunotherapy-based therapies.

Quadruple-Negative GIST Is a Sentinel for Unrecognized Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Syndrome.

PURPOSE: The majority of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are driven by KIT, PDGFRA, or, less commonly, BRAF mutations, and SDH gene inactivation is involved in a limited fraction of gastric lesions. However, about 10% of GISTs are devoid of any of such alterations and are poorly responsive to standard treatments. This study aims to shed light on the molecular drivers of quadruple-negative GISTs. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-two sporadic quadruple-negative GISTs with no prior association with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 syndrome were molecularly profiled for a panel of genes belonging to tyrosine kinase pathways or previously implicated in GISTs. For comparison purposes, 24 GISTs carrying KIT, PDGFRA, or SDH gene mutations were also analyzed. Molecular findings were correlated to clinicopathologic features. RESULTS: Most quadruple-negative GISTs featured intestinal localization, with a female predilection. About 60% (13/22) of quadruple-negative tumors carried NF1 pathogenic mutations, often associated with biallelic inactivation. The analysis of normal tissues, available in 11 cases, indicated the constitutional nature of the NF1 mutation in 7 of 11 cases, unveiling an unrecognized Neurofibromatosis Type 1 syndromic condition. Multifocality and a multinodular pattern of growth were common findings in NF1-mutated quadruple-negative GISTs. CONCLUSIONS: NF1 gene mutations are frequent in quadruple-negative GISTs and are often constitutional, indicating that a significant fraction of patients with apparently sporadic quadruple-negative GISTs are affected by unrecognized Neurofibromatosis Type 1 syndrome. Hence, a diagnosis of quadruple-negative GIST, especially if multifocal or with a multinodular growth pattern and a nongastric location, should alert the clinician to a possible Neurofibromatosis Type 1 syndromic condition. Clin Cancer Res; 23(1); 273-82. ©2016 AACR.

Prognostic impact of mismatch repair genes germline defects in colorectal cancer patients: are all mutations equal?

BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome, caused by germline mutations in MisMatch Repair (MMR) genes, particularly in MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6. Patients with LS seem to have a more favourable prognosis than those with sporadic CRC, although the prognostic impact of different mutation types is unknown. Aim of our study is to compare survival outcomes of different types of MMR mutations in patients with LS-related CRC. METHODS: 302 CRC patients were prospectively selected on the basis of Amsterdam or Revised Bethesda criteria to undergo genetic testing: direct sequencing of DNA and MLPA were used to examine the entire MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 coding sequence. Patients were classified as mutation-positive or negative according to the genetic testing result. RESULTS: A deleterious MMR mutation was found in 38/302 patients. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in mutation-positive vs mutation-negative patients (102.6 vs 77.7 months, HR:0.63, 95%CI:0.46-0.89, p = 0.0083). Different types of mutation were significantly related with OS: missense or splicing-site mutations were associated with better OS compared with rearrangement, frameshift or non-sense mutations (132.5 vs 82.5 months, HR:0.46, 95%CI:0.16-0.82, p = 0.0153). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms improved OS for LS-patients compared with mutation-negative CRC patients. In addition, not all mutations could be considered equal: the better prognosis in CRC patients with MMR pathogenic missense or splicing site mutation could be due to different functional activity of the encoded MMR protein. This matter should be investigated by use of functional assays in the future.

Risk stratification systems for surgically treated localized primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST). Review of literature and comparison of the three prognostic criteria: MSKCC Nomogramm, NIH-Fletcher and AFIP-Miettinen.

PURPOSE: The discovery of Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec®) has revolutionized the treatment of GIST, increasing diseasefree survival (DFS) after complete surgical resection of a primary localized GIST and extending overall survival in metastatic disease. The definition of an accurate prognostic system is critical for the therapeutic decision making process. In literature, there are three main prognostic criteria F/NIH consensus, AFIP standards and modified NIH standards. In recent years were added various risk identification methods applying mathematical calculation model, including MSKCC risk nomogram, Rossi nomogram and Joensuu high Hotline Dengjun. Despite all these attempts, it seems that the recurrence risk probability still cannot be predicted accurately. The aim of our study was to assess and compare the real ability of these prognostic instruments in our single-centre clinical experience, and to define if the use of the MSKCC nomogram can bring benefits in the therapeutic decision. METHODS: All data regarding 37 GIST, who underwent surgical resection from 1996 to 2011 in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. We selected only primary GIST without metastatic disease who underwent a radical resection (R0) but no other therapy. The literature data concerning GISTs prognostication criteria were reviewed. All patients were classified according to the three prognostic criteria (NIH, AFIP and Nomogram MSKCC) and the three instruments were compared with the Kaplan-Meier method. Then we compared the three criteria for their c-index value and we assessed the performance of the nomogram with the calibration test. RESULTS: We observed 9 recurrences (24%) with an average time to relapse of 43 months; the median follow-up was 65 months. In the study selected sample occurred 5 relapses. The probability of relapsing after radical surgery was 7.9% (95% CI 0 - 17.3) at 2 years and 13.3% at 5 years (95% CI 0 - 26.4). The C-Index of the three risk assessment tools was 0.93 (95% CI 0.83-1) for the Nomogram at 5 years, 0.86 (95% CI 0.76-0.95) for the NIH risk criteria and 0.88 (95% CI 0.74-1) for the AFIP risk criteria. The calibration analysis of the nomogram showed an overestimating trend both at 2 and 5 years. CONCLUSION: MSKCC nomogram seems to perform better than NIH, NIH modified and AFIP in our sample and can be used in clinical practice to predict the risk of recurrence, being especially helpful for the therapeutic decision making since it is at the same time simple to use and accurate. As showed from calibration, MSKCC doesn't seem to neglect relapses, even though it is not impeccable in predicting the RFS. Among the 2 older criteria AFIP was more precise than NIH, but considering size in not linear way represented a limit in comparison with the MSKCC Nomogram. All the three risk assessement tools criteria con sidered are capable to predict recurrence in high-risk GISTs while they performed worse in those with lower risk. MSKCC nomogram main limit remains the not linear consideration of mitotic count.

Pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio may be a useful tool in predicting survival in early triple negative breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of evidence that immune response plays a large role in cancer outcome. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been used as a simple parameter of systemic inflammation in several tumors. The purpose was to investigate the association between pre-treatment NLR, disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients with stage I-III TNBC at our Institution from 2006 to 2012. The association between pre-treatment NLR and survival was analyzed. The difference among variables was calculated by chi-square test. DFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox analysis was performed to analyze clinical parameters for their prognostic relevance. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were eligible. There was no significant correlation among pre-treatment NLR and various clinical pathological factors. Patients with NLR higher than 3 showed significantly lower DFS (p = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.009) than patients with NLR equal or lower than 3. The Cox proportional multivariate hazard model revealed that higher pre-treatment NLR was independently correlated with poor DFS and OS, with hazard ratio 5.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-23.88, p = 0.03) and 6.16 (95% CI 1.54-24.66, p = 0.01) respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that pre-treatment NLR may be associated with DFS and OS patients with early TNBC. Further validation and a feasibility study are required before it can be considered for clinical use.

Androgen receptor expression in early triple-negative breast cancer: clinical significance and prognostic associations.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) are characterized by aggressive tumour biology resulting in a poor prognosis. Androgen receptor (AR) is one of newly emerging biomarker in TNBC. In recent years, ARs have been demonstrated to play an important role in the genesis and in the development of breast cancer, although their prognostic role is still debated. In the present study, we explored the correlation of AR expression with clinical, pathological and molecular features and its impact on prognosis in early TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ARs were considered positive in case of tumors with >10% nuclear-stained. Survival distribution was estimated by the Kaplan Meier method. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The difference among variables were calculated by chi-square test. RESULTS: 81 TNBC patients diagnosed between January 2006 and December 2011 were included in the analysis. Slides were stained immunohistochemically for estrogen and progesterone receptors, HER-2, Ki-67, ALDH1, e-cadherin and AR. Of the 81 TNBC samples, 18.8% showed positive immunostaining for AR, 23.5% and 44.4% of patients were negative for e-cadherin and ALDH1, respectively. Positive AR immunostaining was inversely correlated with a higher Ki-67 (p < 0.0001) and a lympho-vascular invasion (p = 0.01), but no other variables. Univariate survival analysis revealed that AR expression was not associated with disease-free survival (p = 0.72) or overall survival (p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The expression of AR is associated with some biological features of TNBC, such as Ki-67 and lympho-vascular invasion; nevertheless the prognostic significance of AR was not documented in our analysis. However, since ARs are expressed in a significant number of TNBC, prospective studies in order to determine the biological mechanisms and their potential role as novel treatment target.

Sub-cellular localization analysis of MSH6 missense mutations does not reveal an overt MSH6 nuclear transport impairment.

Nearly one-third of the identified MSH6 germline mutations deal with single amino acid substitutions. For an effective genetic counselling it is necessary to clearly elucidate by functional tools the specific sub-processes underlying the mismatch repair (MMR) misfunctioning in MSH6 non-truncating mutants. Since the MMR repair pathway occurs in the nucleus, we suppose the impairment of MutSα nuclear trafficking to be a possible Lynch syndrome susceptibility causative mechanism. In the present study the MMR status of the tumour, the main clinical features of mutation carriers and population data associated to the MSH6 missense variants, were complemented with computational data about tolerability predictions and amino acid substitution conservation. The selected panel of ten potentially pathogenic MSH6 mutations was analyzed in a homologous expression system for possible deleterious effects on nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling through the assessment of the sub-cellular localization of the corresponding mutated proteins. Localization analysis results do not reveal an apparent role of MSH6 missense mutations in nuclear import impairment and provide the first hint to exclude the MSH6 nuclear translocation sub-process as a possible causative mechanisms of MMR misfunctioning.

BRCA1 expression in triple negative sporadic breast cancers.

OBJECTIVE: To study how to identify patients with "triple negative" sporadic breast cancers (BCs) having BRCA1 silenced or down-regulated due to epigenetic BRCA1 inactivation. STUDY DESIGN: We selected, from our database, patients diagnosed with BC between 1995 and 2001 with tumors exhibiting the "triple negative" phenotype. "Triple positive" tumors were used as controls. BRCA1 protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and bisulfite sequencing on genomic DNA were used to assess BRCA1 promoter methylation. BRCA1 m-RNA expression analysis was conducted by real-time PCR. RESULTS: Forty-four triple negative and 68 controls (triple positive) were eligible for our analysis. BRCA1 promoter methylation was present in 31.8% of triple negative and in 20.6% of triple positive cases. BRCA1 was inactivated (absent BRCA1 m-RNA expression and lack of BRCA1 protein) in 21.4% of tumors with BRCA1 promoter methylation, as compared with 6% of non-methylated ones (p = 0.0453). CONCLUSION: BRCA1 inactivation due to promoter methylation could play an important role in some sporadic BC cases. Patients with this signature could represent the basis for prospective studies aiming to compare clinical response to different drugs.

Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of a new organizational modality for providing information and support to cancer patients.

PURPOSE: No structured modality for providing information and support to patients in oncology wards has been validated in clinical trials. METHODS: This is a pragmatic, two-arm, cluster randomized trial, with the oncology ward as random assignment unit. Centers were allocated to implement a Point of Information and Support (PIS) or to a control group. The PIS included a library for cancer patients and a specifically trained oncology nurse. End points, measured at patient level, were psychological distress and satisfaction with received information. Both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses considering clustering were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight Italian cancer centers were randomly assigned, and 6 months after PIS creation, 3,286 unselected, consecutive cancer patients were surveyed (1,654 in the experimental group and 1,632 in the control group). Three thousand one hundred ninety-seven (97%) questionnaires were collected and deemed valid. Fifty-two percent of centers (11 of 21 centers) in the experimental arm did not implement the PIS in accordance with the protocol. Overall, 34% of patients showed moderate to severe psychological distress, and only 9% declared dissatisfaction. Intent-to-treat analysis did not yield significant differences. Although the per-protocol analysis did show a reduction in psychological distress (28.9% for functioning PIS v 33.3% for no PIS) and dissatisfaction (6.4% for functioning PIS v 9.3% for no PIS), differences did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: This is the first cluster randomized trial aiming to demonstrate that a structured modality of providing information reduces psychological distress. We did not find this, but we believe results should be interpreted cautiously, particularly because of the low compliance with PIS implementation. Context analysis preceding such interventions is essential.

MSH2 missense mutations and HNPCC syndrome: pathogenicity assessment in a human expression system.

Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) is associated with germline mutations in one of several MisMatch Repair (MMR) genes. An increasing proportion (20-25%) of the reported MSH2 variants consists of single amino-acid substitution with uncertain disease-causing significance. The present study was undertaken to functionally characterize 3 MSH2 nontruncating variants: p.Gly162Arg (c.484G>C), p.Asp167His (c.499G>C) and p.Arg359Ser (c.1077A>T). Missense alterations, were assessed in a human system for expression/stability and for the ability to heterodimerize with MSH6 and correctly localize into the nucleus. Functional assays results were correlated with clinical and genetic features indicative of HNPCC as MicroSatellite-Instability (MSI), abnormalities of MMR gene expression in tumour tissue (IHC) and familial history. p.Gly162Arg and p.Arg359Ser variants showed a clearly decreased expression level of the MutSá complex and were associated with an abnormal subcellular localization pattern, which can be suggestive of an incorrect MSH2/MSH6 heterodimerization. Functional analysis results were supported by MSI and IHC data and by familial cancer history. The subcellular localization assay, performed in a human expression system, classifies as pathogenetic two MSH2 nontruncating alterations providing a useful tool in genetic testing programs.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected gastric cancer: a randomized phase III trial conducted by GOIRC.

BACKGROUND: Complete surgical resection of gastric cancer is potentially curative, but long-term survival is poor. METHODS: Patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach of stages IB, II, IIIA and B, or IV (T4N2M0) and treated with potentially curative surgery were randomly assigned to follow-up alone or to intravenous treatment with four cycles (repeated every 21 days) of PELF (cisplatin [40 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 5], epirubicin [30 mg/m(2), days 1 and 5], L-leucovorin [100 mg/m(2), days 1-4], and 5-fluorouracil [300 mg/m(2), days 1-4] in a hospital setting. Frequencies and severity of adverse events were determined. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between the treatment arms using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards regression model. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: From January 1995 through September 2000, 258 patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy (n = 130) or surgery alone (n = 128). Patient characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. Among those who received chemotherapy, grade 3 or 4 toxic effects including vomiting, mucositis, and diarrhea were experienced by 21.1%, 8.4%, and 11.8% of patients, respectively. Leucopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia of grade 3 or 4 were experienced by 20.3%, 3.3%, and 4.2% of patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 72.8 months, 128 patients (49.6%) experienced recurrence and 139 (53.9%) deaths were observed, one toxicity-related. Relative to treatment with surgery alone, adjuvant chemotherapy did not increase disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] of recurrence = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66 to 1.27) or overall survival (HR of death = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.64 to 1.26). CONCLUSIONS: Our results failed to provide proof of an effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with PELF on overall survival or disease-free survival. The estimated effect of chemotherapy (10% reduction in the hazard of death or relapse) is modest and consistent with the results of meta-analyses of adjuvant chemotherapy without platinum agents.

A missense germline mutation in exon 7 of the MSH2 gene in a HNPCC family from center-Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease predisposing to the development of colorectal cancers and several other malignancies (endometrium, ovaries, stomach, small bowel, hepatobiliary and urinary tract). HNPCC is caused by germline mutations in any of the MisMatch Repair (MMR) genes. Mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 account for almost 90% of all identified ones. About 15% of mutations identified in MSH2 are missense ones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied one family, fulfilling Amsterdam II criteria, referred to our Center for genetic counselling. The proband, and some of her relatives, have been investigated for microsatellite instability (MSI), immunohistochemical MMR protein staining and by direct sequencing and Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). RESULTS: All patients carried the same novel MSH2 germline missense mutation (R359S) in exon 7, which determines the substitution of an Arginine, which is a basic amino acid, with a polar Serine residue (R359S). The mutation was associated with lack of expression of MSH2 protein and high microsatellite instability in tumour tissues. The same mutation has been detected in one healthy relative. CONCLUSIONS: The mutation here reported shows a high correlation with phenotype. The mutation is located in an evolutionary conserved domain. Taken together, our findings suggest evidence that the amino acid substitution can be interpreted as pathogenetic.

Assessing the pathogenicity of MLH1 missense mutations in patients with suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: correlation with clinical, genetic and functional features.

Assessing the pathogenicity of missense mutations of MLH1 and MSH2 is critical to counsel patients with suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Approximately 32% of all MLH1 mutations and 18% of MSH2 mutations are missense variants which often have an uncertain genetic significance. To assess the pathogenicity of four MLH1 missense mutations which were found in five patients with suspected HNPCC, P648S (CCC --> TCC), L559R (CTG --> CGG), K618A (AAG --> GCG), Y646C (TAT --> TGT), we studied their ability to disrupt MLH1 protein function and their relationship with all those clinical, genetic and pathological features which are typical of this syndrome. Our results indicated that the P648S and L559R mutations were probably pathogenic because they disrupted MLH1 protein interaction with its partner PMS2 in vitro and abolished MLH1 expression in HCT116 cells. In addition these variants were associated with features often found in HNPCC patients: in particular high microsatellite instability, occurrence of high grade tumours and, in one case, strong family history. The pathogenicity of the K618A and Y646C mutations was questionable as their correlation with features typical of HNPCC was low and the outcome of the functional analysis was ambiguous. These observations suggested that a clinically usable assessment of the pathogenicity of MLH missense variants can be achieved through the analysis of multiple mutation characteristics among which loss of protein function, occurrence of microsatellite instability and family history seemed to have a predominant role.