Increased 1-Year Revision Rates Among Left-Sided Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To compare 1-year revision rates among left-sided and right-sided intertrochanteric femur fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: 120+ contributing centers to multicentered database. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients who sustained intertrochanteric femur fracture (ITFF) and had a cephalomedullary nail (CMN) from 2015 to 2022 were identified. Patients were then stratified based on left-sided or right-sided fracture. Patients were excluded if younger than 18 years with <1-year follow-up. The intervention investigated was CMN on left or right side. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: One-year revision surgery, comparing CMN performed on left or right side for ITFFs. RESULTS: In total, 113,626 patients met inclusion criteria, with 55,295 in the right-sided cohort and 58,331 in the left-sided cohort. There was no difference between cohorts with respect to age, gender, diabetes, osteoporosis, chronic kidney disease, or congestive heart failure (P > 0.05 for all). Patients who sustained a left ITFF and treated with a CMN were more likely to have revision surgery at 1 year (Left: 1.24%, Right: 0.90%; OR: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.1.33) or develop a nonunion or malunion (Left: 1.30%, Right: 0.98%; OR: 1.31; 95% CI, 1.14-1.52). The most common revision surgery conducted for both cohorts was conversion total hip arthroplasty (Left: 70.4% and Right: 70.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who sustained a left intertrochanteric femur fracture and were treated with a CMN were more likely to undergo revision at 1 year due to nonunion. There were no differences in demographics and comorbidities between cohorts. Though left-sided versus right-sided confounding variables may exist, the difference in nonunion rate may be explained by clockwise torque of the lag screw used in most implants. Increased awareness, implant design, and improved technique during fracture reduction and fixation may help lower this disproportionate nonunion rate and its associated morbidity and financial impact. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The cumulative incidence and risk factors associated with 5-year conversion to knee arthroplasty following primary meniscus repair or primary meniscectomy.

Background: This study aimed to observe the 5-year knee arthroplasty conversion incidence rate and associated risk factors in patients who underwent meniscus procedures. Methods: Using a national database, we analyzed patients who had undergone primary meniscus repair or meniscectomy without prior knee surgeries. The cumulative knee arthroplasty conversion incidence was determined via Kaplan Meier analysis. Risk factors for conversion within 5 years were assessed using a Cox proportional hazard ratio model, with results as hazard ratios (HR). Results: 8125 patients had meniscus repair, while 240,209 had meniscectomy. 5-year conversion rates: repair 1.7%, meniscectomy 8.4%. Arthroplasty likelihood decreased as age decreased for repair (70+ [HR: 162.20]; 60-69 [HR: 81.64]; 50-59 [HR: 49.85]; 40-49 [HR: 17.79]; p < 0.001 all). Additional risk factors included male sex (HR: 0.35; p < 0.001) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (CCI1 [HR: 1.28; p = 0.012]). For meniscectomy, arthroplasty likelihood also decreased with age (70+ [HR: 99.41]; 60-69 [HR: 84.57]; 50-59 [HR: 66.60]; 40-49 [HR: 36.15]; 30-39 [HR: 10.18]; p < 0.001 all). Additional risk factors included male sex (HR: 0.68; p < 0.001), obesity (HR: 1.18; p < 0.001), smoking (HR: 0.1.12; p = 0.010), and higher CCI (CCI1 [HR: 1.25]; CCI2 [HR 1.39]; CCI3+ [HR 1.46]; p < 0.001 all). Conclusion: This study revealed the national 5-year conversion incidence following primary meniscus repair (1.7%) and meniscectomy (8.4%). It also enhanced understanding of age, sex, obesity, smoking, comorbidities (CCI), and knee arthroplasty likelihood after meniscus procedures.

Correlation Between Caregiver Reports of Physical Function and Performance-based Measures in a Cohort of Older Adults With Alzheimer Disease.

The objectives of this report are to determine the association between performance-based measures of physical function with caregiver reports of physical function in older adults with Alzheimer disease (AD) and to examine whether those associations vary by the level of patients' cognitive functioning. Subjects included 180 patient-caregiver dyads who are enrolled in a clinical trial testing the impact of an occupational therapy intervention plus guideline-level care to delay functional decline among older adults with AD. The primary caregiver-reported measure is the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Group Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL). Performance-based measures include the Short Physical Performance Battery and the Short Portable Sarcopenia Measure. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models were used to determine the associations of each physical performance measure with ADCS-ADL, adjusting for cognition function and other covariates. We found significant correlations between caregiver reports and observed performance-based measures across all levels of cognitive function, with patients in the lowest cognitive group showing the highest correlation. These findings support the use of proxy reports to assess physical function among older adults with AD.