Pilot Implementation of Guiando Buenas Decisiones, an Evidence-Based Parenting Program for Spanish-Speaking Families, in Pediatric Primary Care in a Large, U.S. Health System: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Adolescent substance use is a significant public health problem in the United States and Hispanic youth engage in substance use services at lower rates than other groups. For this under-served group, prevention services delivered in non-stigmatized, non-specialty care settings may increase access to the services. We describe findings from a feasibility pilot of the implementation of a virtual version of Guiando Buenas Decisiones (GBD), a universal, group-based substance use prevention program for parents. It was conducted with Spanish-speaking families and delivered, virtually, in pediatric primary care in a large healthcare system in the U.S. Through qualitative interviews with pediatricians (n =7) and parents (n = 26), we explored potential barriers and facilitators of GBD enrollment and engagement. Parents and pediatricians alike noted the dearth of universal prevention programming in Spanish and that GBD could help address the need for linguistically appropriate programming. Parents liked the curriculum content, materials and videos; they felt the focus on strengthening family bonds, setting clear expectations and guidelines, the use of family meetings, and the positive tools provided for navigating family conflict were well-aligned with their cultural and family values. Feedback from parents was helpful for informing more personalized and attentive approaches to program outreach and recruitment methods, and for adaptation of recruitment fliers and letters. In this pediatric primary care context serving an underserved population, we found virtual GBD feasible to implement, acceptable and appealing to parents, and judged by pediatricians as a promising, much-needed addition to their prevention armamentarium.

Long-term recall of social relationships related to addiction and HIV risk behaviors.

BACKGROUND: Social relationships have been demonstrated as a key predictor of relapse among addicted persons and are likely to be important determinants of HIV risk behaviors also. However, the degree to which this population can reliably and consistently identify important people (IPs) in retrospect has been understudied. METHODS: Using the modified Important People and Activities questionnaire, we investigated to what degree IPs were dropped, added, or retained, and whether data about individual IPs were reported accurately on 6- and 12-month follow up periods using a sample of 50 drug or alcohol abusing participants. RESULTS: We found that IPs were largely retained, and that those retained versus dropped/added differed by their reaction to participant alcohol/drug use, as well as frequency of contact. We further found that there were differences in reliability of data describing specific IPs. While both 6- and 12-month follow up periods led to reliabilities ranging from excellent to fair, we found poorer reliability on responses to recall of "frequency of contact" and "reactions to drinking", as well as "reactions to drug use". CONCLUSION: Future investigations of reliability of social relationships recalled retrospectively should attempt to examine possible systematic biases in addition to the reliability of specific IP data. More sophisticated studies are needed on factors associated with systematic variation in reporting of aspects of social relationships that are associated with addictions or HIV risk outcomes.

Examining the reliability of alcohol/drug use and HIV-risk behaviors using Timeline Follow-Back in a pilot sample.

Research on the course of substance use disorders (SUDs) faces challenges in assessing behavior over lengthy time periods. Calendar-based methods, like the Timeline Followback (TLFB), may overcome these challenges. This study assessed the reliability of self-reported weekly alcohol use, drug use, and HIV-risk behaviors over the past 90 days using an interview TLFB. Individuals with SUD in outpatient treatment (N = 26) completed the TLFB at baseline and then a week later with separate interviewers. Weekly ratings were aggregated across 4 week intervals for each administration. Intra-class correlations were used to compare agreement between the two administrations. Reliabilities for alcohol and drug use ratings ranged from good to excellent for most drug categories (ICCs = 0.76 - 1.00), except opioid use (other than heroin) and sedative use produced sub-standard reliabilities (ICCs = 0.29 - 0.74). HIV-risk behavior reliabilities also ranged from good to excellent (ICCs = 0.70 - 0.97), but were substandard for the number of casual sex partners for some intervals (ICCs = 0.29, 0.63). Findings extend support for the use of TLFB to produce reliable assessments of many drugs and HIV-risk behaviors across longitudinal intervals.