Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AJPM Focus ; 3(3): 100199, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545124

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In anticipation of institutional and community-wide COVID-19 immunization clinics, an educational program for the administration of COVID-19 vaccines was developed, collaborating with the Virginia Department of Health to train doctor of medicine and physician assistant students to serve as vaccinators. Faculty and students also worked with state legislatures to propose and enact a bill that would enable such students to vaccinate patients. Methods: Between January 2021 and August 2022, 263 student volunteers completed 3,685 person-hours, administering 48,279 doses. On the basis of community need, the majority of vaccines were administered at mass vaccination clinics in Chesapeake (47%) and Norfolk (22%) in Virginia. One year after the first COVID-19 immunization clinic, the authors surveyed students who assisted with clinics, utilizing a Likert scale and free-text responses to elicit feedback about the training and volunteer experience. Results: Volunteers ranked the vaccination clinics among the top third of established volunteer experiences offered at Eastern Virginia Medical School, and 75% of respondents believed that this training should be a permanent part of their program curriculum. Conclusions: This paper presents a strategy for preparing students to serve as vaccinators during public health emergencies and show how other institutions of medical education can prepare for and engage student participation in vaccination campaigns and emergent health initiatives.

2.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 33(5): 765-773, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32989071

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To understand patient attitudes, access toward video calling to enhance efficiency of after-hours triage calls. METHODS: We surveyed patients aged 18 to 89 years. Questions included demographics, preferences, access to video calling devices, and perceived advantages and disadvantages of this technology. Answers were entered into Qualtrics database and analyzed using JMP 11 (SAS, Cary, NC). RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-eight patients agreed to participate. Mean age was 47.9 years; 71.6% were female; and 75.1% had access to video calling device. Device proficiency was inversely related to age and greatest in 18-to-32-years group (χ2 = 71.18, P < .0001). Seventy-one percent of patients enjoyed video communication, directly proportional to education (trend test Z = 2.78, P < .005). Adjusted for both age and education, respondents with college education or above were 3 times more likely to self identify as "good' with video (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.48-6.64); those under age 48 had even higher proficiency (Odds ratio (OR), 13.9; 95% CI, 4.79-59.34). Patients with prior video experience were 3 times more likely to prefer video calling (Relative risk (RR) = 3.46; 95% CI, 1.95-6.11). Patients calling their doctor 5 or more times annually preferred video calling significantly more than calling by telephone (RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.31-1.97). Faster contact with the primary care provider (19.8%) was the most perceived advantage. Loss of in-person interaction with doctor (37.1%) was the greatest perceived disadvantage. CONCLUSIONS: Patients seem to have access and interest in video communication for after-hours calls. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether addition of video component to after-hours triage calls will help reduce unnecessary emergency department visits.


Subject(s)
After-Hours Care , Patient Preference , Telemedicine , Videoconferencing , Adolescent , Adult , After-Hours Care/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Triage/methods , Videoconferencing/organization & administration , Young Adult
3.
Vaccine ; 23(25): 3256-63, 2005 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15837230

ABSTRACT

Since 1996, the scientific community has become aware of 14 reports of yellow fever vaccine (YEL)-associated viscerotropic disease (YEL-AVD) cases and four reports of YEL-associated neurotropic disease (YEL-AND) worldwide, changing our understanding of the risks of the vaccine. Based on 722 adverse event reports after YEL submitted to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System in 1990-2002, we updated the estimates of the age-adjusted reporting rates of serious adverse events, YEL-AVD and YEL-AND. We found that the reporting rates of serious adverse events were significantly higher among vaccinees aged > or =60 years than among those 19-29 years of age (reporting rate ratio = 5.9, 95% CI 1.6-22.2). Yellow fever is a serious and potentially fatal disease. For elderly travelers, the risk for severe illness and death due to yellow fever infection should be balanced against the risk of a serious adverse event due to YEL.


Subject(s)
Yellow Fever Vaccine/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hepatitis A Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Infant , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Military Personnel , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , Travel , Typhoid-Paratyphoid Vaccines/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...