E-nursing homes: transforming access to nurses in nursing homes in response to the staffing crisis.

The UK is facing a nationwide staffing crisis within adult social care, due to difficulties in recruiting and retaining registered nurses. Current interpretation of legislation means nursing homes must always have the physical presence of a registered nurse on duty within the home. With the shortage of registered nurses increasing, reliance on agency workers is commonplace, a practice impacting service cost and continuity of care. Lack of innovation to tackle this issue means the question of how to transform service delivery to combat staffing shortages is open for debate. The potential for technology to augment the provision of care was highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this article the authors present one possible solution focused on the provision of digital nursing care within nursing homes. Anticipated benefits include enhanced accessibility of nursing roles, reduced risk of viral spread and opportunities for upskilling staff. However, challenges include the current interpretation of legislation.

How do women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus use mHealth during and after pregnancy? Qualitative exploration of women's views and experiences.

BACKGROUND: Women experiencing gestational diabetes face challenges during and after pregnancy that could be supported with mobile health. Mobile health isn't routinely implemented and little is known regarding its use to aid information seeking, peer support and behaviour change. Understanding women's experiences of mHealth is critical to ensuring acceptance and use, particularly with relation to postpartum and interconception periods, where support is currently lacking. This study therefore aimed to explore the views and experiences of women with previous gestational diabetes, on using mHealth resources before, during and after pregnancy.Women's expectations for future mHealth were also explored. SETTING: Ten female participants from across the United Kingdom, experiencing GDM within the past five years, were convenience sampled from a group of individuals participating in a webinar. The webinar about technology to support GDM management was advertised online and all of those who registered were invited, via email, to take part. DESIGN: Women's views and experiences were explored using semi-structured telephone interviews. Audio recorded data were transcribed, coded and analysed using NVivo 12. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data, creating main and sub-themes. Data are presented in narrative form. PARTICIPANTS: Ten women living across the United Kingdom who had experienced gestational diabetes within the past five years, participated. FINDINGS: All ten women used mHealth, valuing social media for dietary information and peer support. Few mHealth resources were recommended by professionals and women discussed discontentment with the information they provided. Information found online was often valued over that provided by professionals. Some women used apps for behaviour change, but disliked certain features and poor engagement hindered their use. Women desired an app to overcome lack of motivation and prepare them for future healthy pregnancies. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Information provided to women by professionals was viewed as 'limited' and mHealth resources were rarely recommended. In response, women used social media to meet informational and emotional needs. Postpartum behaviour change is important to women and could be facilitated with tailored mHealth focused on increasing motivation. To maximise adoption and engagement future mHealth should be integrated with existing resources women value and be co-produced with professionals. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Current lack of engagement in mHealth for GDM by healthcare professionals means opportunities to influence or contest poor information are missed. We recommend increased participation by professionals to reduce opportunities for information miss-spread and reliance on peer driven information. Increasing digital confidence among professionals to support women navigate online spaces and take part in co-design is recommended.

Ethical perceptions towards real-world use of companion robots with older people and people with dementia: survey opinions among younger adults.

BACKGROUND: Use of companion robots may reduce older people's depression, loneliness and agitation. This benefit has to be contrasted against possible ethical concerns raised by philosophers in the field around issues such as deceit, infantilisation, reduced human contact and accountability. Research directly assessing prevalence of such concerns among relevant stakeholders, however, remains limited, even though their views clearly have relevance in the debate. For example, any discrepancies between ethicists and stakeholders might in itself be a relevant ethical consideration while concerns perceived by stakeholders might identify immediate barriers to successful implementation. METHODS: We surveyed 67 younger adults after they had live interactions with companion robot pets while attending an exhibition on intimacy, including the context of intimacy for older people. We asked about their perceptions of ethical issues. Participants generally had older family members, some with dementia. RESULTS: Most participants (40/67, 60%) reported having no ethical concerns towards companion robot use when surveyed with an open question. Twenty (30%) had some concern, the most common being reduced human contact (10%), followed by deception (6%). However, when choosing from a list, the issue perceived as most concerning was equality of access to devices based on socioeconomic factors (m = 4.72 on a scale 1-7), exceeding more commonly hypothesized issues such as infantilising (m = 3.45), and deception (m = 3.44). The lowest-scoring issues were potential for injury or harm (m = 2.38) and privacy concerns (m = 2.17). Over half (39/67 (58%)) would have bought a device for an older relative. Cost was a common reason for choosing not to purchase a device. CONCLUSIONS: Although a relatively small study, we demonstrated discrepancies between ethical concerns raised in the philosophical literature and those likely to make the decision to buy a companion robot. Such discrepancies, between philosophers and 'end-users' in care of older people, and in methods of ascertainment, are worthy of further empirical research and discussion. Our participants were more concerned about economic issues and equality of access, an important consideration for those involved with care of older people. On the other hand the concerns proposed by ethicists seem unlikely to be a barrier to use of companion robots.