Long-Term Adherence to Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Long-term treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is required for the majority of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) to prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolism. Adherence to therapy may impact clinical outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the potential impact of structured follow-up on long-term adherence to DOAC therapy compared to standard care. METHODS: This is a cross sectional study on the implementation phase of medication adherence to DOACs, comparing patients with AF following completion of structured follow-up of minimally 1 year with those who received standard care. All patients used DOACs for more than 2 years and completed a questionnaire on adherence. Adherence was measured with the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8) score and assessed via an online web portal. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients were included. The mean MMAS-8 score was 7.55 (SD 0.93) after structured follow-up and 7.25 (SD 1.01) for standard care; p = 0.045. Following structured follow-up 64.1% of patients had a high adherence (MMAS score of 8) compared to 50% receiving standard care; p = 0.05. Patients following structured follow-up on a once daily DOAC regime had higher MMAS-8 scores compared to those on a twice daily regime; 7.74 (SD 0.74) versus 7.00 (SD 1.22); p < 0.001. The rates of minor bleedings were 10.6% versus 21.4% respectively, p = 0.038. CONCLUSION: In patients on long-term DOAC treatment, adherence to therapy was significantly increased after receiving an initial period of structured follow-up compared to standard care. Additionally, adherence to DOAC therapy was higher with once-daily treatment regimen. Significant more minor bleedings were reported in the standard care group. These results indicate that implementation of structured follow-up of patients with AF using DOACs merits further evaluation.

Hemostasis and fibrinolysis in COVID-19 survivors 6 months after intensive care unit discharge.

BACKGROUND: The prothrombotic phenotype has been extensively described in patients with acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, potential long-term hemostatic abnormalities are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in routine hemostasis laboratory parameters and tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) 6 months after COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) discharge in patients with and without venous thromboembolism (VTE) during admission. METHODS: Patients with COVID-19 of the Maastricht Intensive Care COVID cohort with tPA ROTEM measurement at ICU and 6-month follow-up were included. TPA ROTEM is a whole blood viscoelastic assay that illustrates both clot development and fibrinolysis due to simultaneous addition of tissue factor and tPA. Analyzed ROTEM parameters include clotting time, maximum clot firmness (MCF), lysis onset time (LOT), and lysis time (LT). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with COVID-19 were included and showed extensive hemostatic abnormalities before ICU discharge. TPA ROTEM MCF (75 mm [interquartile range, 68-78]-59 mm [49-63]; P ≤ .001), LOT (3690 seconds [2963-4418]-1786 seconds [1465-2650]; P ≤ .001), and LT (7200 seconds [6144-7200]-3138 seconds [2591-4389]; P ≤ .001) normalized 6 months after ICU discharge. Of note, eight and four patients still had elevated fibrinogen and D-dimer concentrations at follow-up, respectively. In general, no difference in median hemostasis parameters at 6-month follow-up was observed between patients with (n=14) and without (n=8) VTE, although fibrinogen appeared to be lower in the VTE group (VTE-, 4.3 g/L [3.7-4.7] vs VTE+, 3.4 g/L [3.2-4.2]; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Six months after COVID-19 ICU discharge, no persisting hypercoagulable or hypofibrinolytic profile was detected by tPA ROTEM. Nevertheless, increased D-dimer and fibrinogen concentrations persist up to 6 months in some patients, warranting further exploration of the role of hemostasis in long-term morbidity after hospital discharge.

Ruling out Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with (Suspected) COVID-19-A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background Diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) have not been prospectively evaluated in COVID-19 patients. Methods Prospective, multicenter, outcome study in 707 patients with both (suspected) COVID-19 and suspected PE in 14 hospitals. Patients on chronic anticoagulant therapy were excluded. Informed consent was obtained by opt-out approach. Patients were managed by validated diagnostic strategies for suspected PE. We evaluated the safety (3-month failure rate) and efficiency (number of computed tomography pulmonary angiographies [CTPAs] avoided) of the applied strategies. Results Overall PE prevalence was 28%. YEARS was applied in 36%, Wells rule in 4.2%, and "CTPA only" in 52%; 7.4% was not tested because of hemodynamic or respiratory instability. Within YEARS, PE was considered excluded without CTPA in 29%, of which one patient developed nonfatal PE during follow-up (failure rate 1.4%, 95% CI 0.04-7.8). One-hundred seventeen patients (46%) managed according to YEARS had a negative CTPA, of whom 10 were diagnosed with nonfatal venous thromboembolism (VTE) during follow-up (failure rate 8.8%, 95% CI 4.3-16). In patients managed by CTPA only, 66% had an initial negative CTPA, of whom eight patients were diagnosed with a nonfatal VTE during follow-up (failure rate 3.6%, 95% CI 1.6-7.0). Conclusion Our results underline the applicability of YEARS in (suspected) COVID-19 patients with suspected PE. CTPA could be avoided in 29% of patients managed by YEARS, with a low failure rate. The failure rate after a negative CTPA, used as a sole test or within YEARS, was non-negligible and reflects the high thrombotic risk in these patients, warranting ongoing vigilance.

ERS statement on standardisation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in chronic lung diseases.

The objective of this document was to standardise published cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) protocols for improved interpretation in clinical settings and multicentre research projects. This document: 1) summarises the protocols and procedures used in published studies focusing on incremental CPET in chronic lung conditions; 2) presents standard incremental protocols for CPET on a stationary cycle ergometer and a treadmill; and 3) provides patients' perspectives on CPET obtained through an online survey supported by the European Lung Foundation. We systematically reviewed published studies obtained from EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 2017. Of 7914 identified studies, 595 studies with 26 523 subjects were included. The literature supports a test protocol with a resting phase lasting at least 3 min, a 3-min unloaded phase, and an 8- to 12-min incremental phase with work rate increased linearly at least every minute, followed by a recovery phase of at least 2-3 min. Patients responding to the survey (n=295) perceived CPET as highly beneficial for their diagnostic assessment and informed the Task Force consensus. Future research should focus on the individualised estimation of optimal work rate increments across different lung diseases, and the collection of robust normative data.

Blood Eosinophil Counts, Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Risk of COPD Exacerbations and Mortality in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

Although recently introduced in the pharmacological treatment algorithm of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a need for more data supporting the use of blood eosinophil counts as a biomarker to guide inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of moderate and/or severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality in a large primary care population after withdrawal of ICS compared to continued users stratified by elevated blood eosinophil counts. In this population based cohort study, we used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in the United Kingdom. We included subjects' aged 40 years or more who had a diagnosis of COPD. We excluded subjects with a history of asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, cardiac arrhythmia and bronchiectasis, COPD exacerbations occurring within 6 weeks prior to index date, or with a myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to index date. Continuous users were subjects who received their most recent ICS prescription within 3 months before the start of an interval. ICS withdrawals were those who discontinued ICS for more than 3 months. We evaluated the risk of moderate and/or severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality among subjects with various blood eosinophil thresholds who withdrew from ICS compared to continuous ICS users with elevated blood eosinophil levels using Cox regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders. We identified 48,157 subjects diagnosed with COPD between 1 January 2005 to 31 January 2014. Withdrawal of ICS was not associated with an increased risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbations among subjects with absolute blood eosinophil counts ≥0.34 × 109 cells/L [adjusted hazard ratio (adj. HR) 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.81] or relative counts ≥ 4.0% (adj. HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.66-0.78). Similarly, withdrawal of ICS was not associated with an increased risk of severe exacerbations among subjects with absolute blood eosinophil ≥0.34 × 109 cells/L (adj. HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.61-1.10) or relative blood eosinophil counts ≥4.0% (adj. HR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.61-1.04). No increased risk of all-cause mortality was observed among subjects who withdrew from ICS irrespective of elevated absolute or relative blood eosinophil counts. In a real-world primary care population, we did not observe an increased risk of moderate and/or severe COPD exacerbations or all-cause mortality among subjects with eosinophilia who withdrew their use of ICS.

Blood eosinophilia, use of inhaled corticosteroids, and risk of COPD exacerbations and mortality.

PURPOSE: It remains unclear whether eosinophilia is useful for in guiding inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The goal of this study is to evaluate the risk of acute exacerbations, COPD-related hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits, and all-cause mortality with various levels of eosinophil counts among COPD patients using ICS. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients were aged 40+ and had COPD (n = 32 693). Current users of ICS were stratified by relative and absolute eosinophil counts to determine the risk of outcomes with blood eosiniphilia using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Among COPD patients, current use of ICS was not associated with a reduced risk of acute COPD exacerbations, COPD-related hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits, and all-cause mortality. Stratification of ICS use by absolute or relative eosinophil counts did not result in significant differences in risk of COPD exacerbations or hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits. However, all-cause mortality was reduced by 12% to 24% among patients with eosinophilia. CONCLUSIONS: COPD-related acute exacerbations or hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits were not reduced with eosinophilia among users of ICS with COPD. However, all-cause mortality was reduced by 12% to 24%. These findings are potentially important and require further evaluation in prospective studies.

Increased Small Intestinal Permeability during Severe Acute Exacerbations of COPD.

BACKGROUND: Disturbances of intestinal integrity, manifested by increased gastro-intestinal (GI) permeability, have been found in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients during physical activity, often associated with intermittent hypoxic periods. Evidence about extrapulmonary organ disturbances, especially of the GI tract, during hospitalised acute exacerbation of COPD (AE-COPD) with hypoxaemic respiratory failure (RF) is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess changes in GI permeability in patients with AE-COPD and during recovery 4 weeks later. METHODS: All patients admitted to our hospital with AE-COPD accompanied by hypoxaemia at admission (PaO2 <8.7 kPa or O2 saturation <93%) were screened between October 2013 and February 2014. Patients with a history of GI or renal disease, chronic heart failure, or use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the 48 h before the test were excluded. GI permeability was assessed by evaluating urinary excretion ratios of the orally ingested sugars lactulose/L-rhamnose (L/R ratio), sucrose/L-rhamnose (Su/R ratio) and sucralose/erythritol (S/E ratio). RESULTS: Seventeen patients with severe to very severe COPD completed the study. L/R ratio (×103) at admission of AE-COPD was significantly higher than in the recovery condition (40.9 [29.4-49.6] vs. 27.3 [19.5-47.7], p = 0.039), indicating increased small intestinal permeability. There were no significant differences in the individual sugar levels in urine nor in the 0- to 5-h urinary S/E and Su/R ratios between the 2 visits. CONCLUSION: This is the first study showing increased GI permeability during hospitalised AE-COPD accompanied by hypoxaemic RF. Therefore, GI integrity in COPD patients is an attractive target for future research and for the development of interventions to alleviate the consequences of AE-COPD.

Impact of exacerbations on adherence and outcomes of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Dropout or lack of response is an important issue in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), which underlines the need to identify predictors of dropout and response. Acute exacerbations (AEs) of COPD may influence dropout rates and PR response. We aimed to assess differences in dropout and outcomes of PR between COPD with and without AEs. METHODS: Clinically stable patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD (age: 64.1 ± 9.1 years, 55.6% males, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ): 48.6 ± 20.0% predicted) were assessed during PR (inpatient and outpatient). Mild-to-moderate AEs were defined as 'the prescription of systemic glucocorticosteroids and/or antibiotics, following an acute increase in respiratory symptoms'. Severe AEs were defined as 'a hospital admission due to an AE'. Health status was measured by COPD Assessment Test (CAT), COPD-specific version of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C) and Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ). Symptoms of anxiety and depression were measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Exercise capacity was measured with the 6-min walking test (6MWT) and constant work rate test (CWRT). RESULTS: A total of 518 patients were assessed during a pre-rehabilitation assessment. Four hundred and seventy-six patients started PR, of whom 419 (88.0%) completed it. A larger proportion of patients who dropped out had a severe AE during PR (20.0% vs 3.5%, P < 0.001). Completers with severe AE showed a deterioration in 6MWT, while completers without AE and with mild-to-moderate AE improved (-24.8 (95% CI: -94.0 to 44.5) vs 24.2 (95% CI: 16.0 to 32.5) vs 25.1 (95% CI: 14.0 to 36.3) metres, P = 0.042). No other significant differences were observed in outcomes comparing completers with and without AE during PR. CONCLUSION: Mild-to-moderate AEs do not affect dropout or response of PR, although severe AEs are associated with dropout. AEs should not lead to discontinuation of PR, as response is in general not affected.

Increased Severity and Mortality of CAP in COPD: Results from the German Competence Network, CAPNETZ.

Background:Mortality of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains high despite significant research efforts. Knowledge about comorbidities including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) might help to improve management and ultimately, survival. The impact of COPD on CAP severity and mortality remains a point of discussion. Objectives:Assess the prevalence and clinical characteristics of COPD in the observational German Competence Network for CAP, CAPNETZ, and to study the impact of COPD on CAP severity and mortality. Methods:1307 consecutive patients with CAP (57.0% males, age 59.0±18.5), classified as CAP-only (n=1043; 78.0%) and CAP-COPD (n=264; 20.2%) were followed up for 180 days. Associations between CAP, COPD and mortality were evaluated by univariate/multivariate and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Results:CAP-COPD patients were older, more often males, current/former smokers, with higher confusion-urea-respiratory rate-blood pressure, (CURB) scores. Length of hospital stay, urea, glucose and leucocytes plasma levels, and arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) were significantly increased in CAP-COPD. Thirty, 90- and 180-day mortality rates were significantly increased in CAP-COPD (p=0.046, odds ratio [OR]=2.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.015-6.037; p=0.003, OR=2.80, 95%CI 1.430-5.468; p=0.001, OR=2.57, 95%CI 1.462-4.498; respectively). Intensive care unit (ICU)-admission and age, but not COPD, were identified as independent predictors of short- and long-term mortality. Conclusion:Severity as well as mortality was significantly higher in COPD patients with CAP. To improve CAP management with the aim to decrease its still-too-high mortality, underlying comorbidities, particularly COPD, need to be assessed.