ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this prospective study was the evaluation of ambulatory (less than 12h) prostate photoselective vaporisation (PVP) with GreenLight laser XPS. MATERIEL AND METHODS: One hundred and fifteen consecutive patients eligible for ambulatory procedure according to selective criteria (age less than 80, no anticoagulation treatment, no diabetes, patient not alone at home) who underwent ambulatory PVP from 1st May 2012 to 30th June 2013 have been evaluated. The principal criterion was the success rate of ambulatory. Secondary criteria were 3 months functional results and complication rate and satisfaction rate on ambulatory procedure. RESULTS: Around 93.1% patients were successfully treated in ambulatory procedure. The main reason of failure was organizational. There were 2 conversions in monopolar resection and one operative complication. At 3 months, there were 11.5% grade 2 complications with 3.48% rehospitalizations and no reintervention. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of ambulatory PVP. This procedure should be proposed to selected patients.
Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Seminal vesicle biopsies (SVB) in the staging of prostate cancer are controversial. Our main objective was to assess their contribution before radiation therapy or brachytherapy. Our secondary objective was to compare pathologic findings of the SVB to the magnetic resonance imaging's (MRI) results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2000 to 2008, 135 men (median age: 70 years) with prostate cancer (cT1a to cT3) underwent SVB right and left. The median PSA was 12 ng/ml. The median Gleason score was 7. Forty-one patients had an endorectal MRI. The median follow-up was 47 months. RESULTS: Seminal vesicle involvement was found in 10% of patients. In 9.2% of cases, the biopsy was not contributive. The risk of invasion was significantly associated with the stage T3, the Gleason score up to 7 and the percentage of prostate positive biopsies. A MRI was performed in 41 cases: the correlation between MRI and SVB for the invasion of seminal vesicle was significant but moderate (kappa=0.38). The complications rate of SVB was 10%. CONCLUSION: SVB were a simple and profitable method. They have provided supplementary information that could improve the staging and that could lead to the make use of an appropriate treatment. This information was comparable to the information provided by MRI. Further studies should establish their role in relation to MRI and in particular confirm the best specificity of the SVB.
Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Seminal Vesicles/pathology , Aged , Biopsy, Needle , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To identify the risk factors for ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation and to evaluate their impact on both graft and patient survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 789 kidney transplants among 782 patients performed at our institution between 1995 and 2007. The parameters studied included the characteristics of the donor, recipient and transplant, the surgical variables, the elements of the monitoring process and a graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The ureteral stenosis rate after renal transplantation was found to be 6.5%, and the ureterovesical junction was the most common location (68%). A univariate analysis showed that this complication was significantly associated with a higher donor age (P=0.01), abnormal graft revascularisation (P=0.032) and DGF (Delay Graft Function) (P=0.05). In multivariate analysis, only donor age (P=0.001) and abnormal graft revascularisation (P=0.035) were independent risk factors for ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation. When ureteral stenosis was treated, an analysis of the survival curves according to the Kaplan-Meier method did not reveal significant differences either in graft survival (P=0.518) or overall survival of the patients (P=0.614) as compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, donor age and abnormal graft revascularisation were independent risk factors for ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation. This result is a strong argument for an ischemic component in the genesis of ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation, which should help to identify patients at risk.
