Anthracycline cardiotoxicity in the elderly cancer patient: a SIOG expert position paper.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities and risk factors likely to complicate treatment are common in elderly cancer patients. Anthracyclines remain the cornerstone of first-line therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and metastatic and early breast cancer but can cause congestive heart failure. Elderly patients are at increased risk of this event and measures to reduce it should be considered. METHODS: A committee of experts in breast cancer and NHL met under the auspices of the International Society for Geriatric Oncology to review the literature and make recommendations, based on level of evidence, for the assessment, treatment and monitoring of elderly patients requiring anthracyclines. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy illustrates many of the dilemmas facing elderly cancer patients. Age in itself should not prevent access to potentially curative treatment or treatment that prolongs life or improves its quality. The risk of cardiotoxicity with conventional anthracyclines is increased by the following factors: an existing or history of heart failure or cardiac dysfunction; hypertension, diabetes and coronary artery disease; older age (independent of comorbidities and performance status); prior treatment with anthracyclines; higher cumulative dose of anthracyclines and short infusion duration. The fact that cumulative and irreversible cardiotoxicity is likely to be greater in this population than among younger patients calls for effective pretreatment screening for risk factors, rigorous monitoring of cardiac function and early intervention. Use of liposomal anthracycline formulations, prolonging the infusion time for conventional anthracyclines and cardioprotective measures should be considered. However, when treatment is being given with curative intent, care should be taken to ensure reduced cardiotoxicity is not achieved at the expense of efficacy.

Variations in schedules of ifosfamide administration: a better understanding of its implications on pharmacokinetics through a randomized cross-over study.

PURPOSE: The metabolism of ifosfamide is a delicate balance between a minor activation pathway (4-hydroxylation) and a mainly toxification pathway (N-dechloroethylation), and there remains uncertainty as to the optimal intravenous schedule. METHODS: This study assesses ifosfamide pharmacokinetics (PK) according to two standard schedules. Using a 1:1 randomized trial design, we prospectively evaluated ifosfamide PK on two consecutive cycles of 3 g/m2/day for 3 days (9 g/m2/cycle) given in one of two schedules either by continuous infusion (CI) or short (3 h) infusion. Highly sensitive analytical methods allowed determination of concentrations of ifosfamide and the key metabolites 4-hydroxy-ifosfamide, 2- and 3-dechloroethyl-ifosfamide. RESULTS: Extensive PK analysis was available in 12 patients and showed equivalence between both schedules (3 h versus CI) based on area under the curves (micromol/l x h) for ifosfamide, 4-hydroxy-ifosfamide, 2- and 3-dechloroethyl-ifosfamide (9,379 +/- 2,638 versus 8,307 +/- 1,995, 152 +/- 59 versus 161 +/- 77, 1,441 +/- 405 versus 1,388 +/- 393, and 2,808 +/- 508 versus 2,634 +/- 508, respectively, all P > 0.2). The classical auto-induction of metabolism over the 3 days of infusion was confirmed for both schedules. CONCLUSION: This study confirms similar PK for both active and toxic metabolites of ifosfamide in adult cancer patients when 9 g/m2 of ifosfamide is administered over 3 days by CI or daily 3-h infusions.