Project ECHO for Cancer Care: a Scoping Review of Provider Outcome Evaluations.

The Project ECHO model of telementoring has been used for the past 10 years to expand access to specialized cancer care. This scoping review identifies evidence for the model's ability to improve provider outcomes, synthesizing findings from existing studies within Moore et al.'s (2009) framework for continuing medical education outcomes. We search two large research databases and a collection maintained by Project ECHO staff for articles that focus on cancer ECHO programs, involve primary data collection, and were published between December 1, 2016, and November 30, 2021. We identified 25 articles for inclusion in our scoping review. Most articles reported results for outcomes related to program participation: attendance, satisfaction, and learning. Yet, just under half reported changes in provider practices. Results demonstrate widespread participation and improved learning resulting from ECHO programs focused on cancer care. There is also evidence of improved practices related to HCV vaccination and palliative care. We highlight examples of best practices as well as opportunities to improve provider outcome evaluations for cancer ECHO programs.

Evaluating a Web-based Training Curriculum for Disseminating Best Practices for the Care of Newborns with Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome in a Rural Hospital, the NOWS-NM Program.

Background: The incidence of neonatal opiate withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) in the US has grown dramatically over the past two decades. Many rural hospitals not equipped to manage these patients transfer them to hospitals in bigger cities. Methods: We created a curriculum, the NOWS-NM Program, a mobile/web-based curriculum training in best practices. To evaluate the curriculum, we conducted pre- and post-surveys of NOWS knowledge, attitudes, and care practices, plus post-curriculum interviews and focus groups. Results: Fourteen participants completed both pre- and post-curriculum surveys. They indicated an increase in knowledge and care practices. A small number of respondents expressed negative attitudes about parents of infants with NOWS at pre-test, the training curriculum appeared to have no impact on such attitudes at post-test. Sixteen participants participated in focus groups or interviews. Qualitative data reinforced the positive quantitative results and contradicted the negative survey results, respondents reported that the program did reduce stigma and improve provider/staff interactions with patients. Conclusions: This curriculum demonstrated positive impacts on NOWS knowledge and care practices. Incorporating focus on core concepts of trauma-informed care and self-regulation in future iterations of the curriculum may strengthen the opportunity to change attitudes and address the needs expressed by participants and improve care of families and babies with NOWS. Significance: This project evaluates a novel curriculum covering best practices in care of infants with neonatal opiate withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) and is oriented toward supporting care in rural NM hospitals. We evaluated the curriculum with both quantitative and qualitative methods. Results support the effectiveness of the curriculum to increase competence of rural providers in the care of patients with NOWS. The NOWS-NM Program is a novel and effective mobile training tool, especially for under-resourced, rural hospitals.

Community-dwelling older adults' acceptance of smartwatches for health and location tracking.

BACKGROUND: Despite rapid growth in the popularity of smartwatches, evidence lacks regarding older adults' acceptance of smartwatches. Since most wearable sensors are not designed specifically for older adults, there is a need to examine wearability and usability challenges of wearable sensing devices faced by older adults to facilitate the use of objective measurements of health and mobility. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine older adults' perceptions of GPS-enabled smartwatches and to identify potential barriers and facilitators of smartwatch and sensor data use. METHODS: As part of a larger feasibility study, we conducted a mixed-methods study that included a descriptive content analysis of interviews and a brief usability survey with 30 participants aged 60 years and older after they had used a smartwatch for 3 days. RESULTS: Most participants perceived wearable activity trackers including smartwatches and sensor-based data as useful for tracking health, finding activity patterns and promoting healthy behaviours. Privacy was of little concern, leading to willingness to share activity and location data with others. Participants identified barriers to usability as clumsy design, lack of aesthetic appeal, and difficulty reading the display and using the GPS tracking function. In contrast, identified facilitators of adoption included a big display, high-tech look, self-awareness and possible behaviour change. CONCLUSIONS: Smartwatches have the potential of personalised detection of health deterioration and disability prevention, based on analysis of older adults' activities in free-living environments. The usefulness of this technology for older adults can be significantly increased by addressing usability issues and providing instructions on challenging features. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: To support sustained self-monitoring behaviours through wearable sensor devices in older adults, it is critical to examine how they perceive those devices and identify factors affecting technology acceptance that can maximise adoption.

Use of a Benchmark Tracking Assessment to Support Expansion of Buprenorphine for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care.

INTRODUCTION: Barriers to the expansion of opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment in primary care using buprenorphine are well documented. Providers require support along a continuum. A systematic tracking framework to enhance provider progress along this continuum is lacking. METHODS: We developed a benchmark tracking assessment (BTA) as part of data collection in a 5-year study to examine the impact of provider participation in an online intervention to support expansion of buprenorphine treatment for OUD in rural primary care. Providers were contacted via phone every 3 months for up to 2 years to track their advancement along the 5 identified key benchmarks and were offered support for any barriers encountered. RESULTS: Forty-one providers enrolled in the study. Almost half (49%) did not experience a barrier that prevented them from accomplishing their next benchmark. Of the remaining 51% of providers, the majority (75%) experienced barriers early in the training and licensure phases, with most citing lack of time as the main reason. CONCLUSION: The BTA offers a feasible approach to identifying challenges along the training to prescription continuum and facilitated targeted support to address barriers. This framework has the potential, with locally contextual adaptations, to guide medication-assisted treatment implementation and training efforts.

Enhancing Collaborative Learning for Quality Improvement: Evidence from the Improving Clinical Flow Project, a Breakthrough Series Collaborative with Project ECHO.

BACKGROUND: This project engaged teams from Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in a quality improvement (QI) collaborative to improve clinical flow (increase quality and efficiency of operations), using a novel combination of Breakthrough Series Collaborative tools with Project ECHO's telementoring model. This mixed methods study describes the collaborative and evaluates its success in generating improvement and developing QI capacity at participating FQHCs. METHODS: The 18-month collaborative used three in-person/virtual learning session workshops and weekly telementoring sessions with brief lectures and case-based learning. Participants engaged in QI work (for example, PDSAs [Plan-Do-Study-Act]) and tracked data for 10 care system measures to evaluate progress. These data were averaged across consistently reporting sites for standard run chart analysis. Semistructured interviews assessed the effectiveness and value of the approach for participants. RESULTS: Fifteen sites across the United States participated for one year (Cohort 1); 10 sites continued to 18 months (Cohort 2). Cohort 2 evidenced improvement for 6 measures: Patient/Family Experience, Patient Time Valued, Empanelment, Cycle Time, Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate, and Third Next Available Appointment. Progress varied across sites and measures. Participant interviews indicated value from both in-person and virtual activities, increased QI knowledge, and professional growth, as well as challenges when participants lacked time, engagement, leadership support, and consistent and committed staff. CONCLUSION: This novel collaborative structure is promising. Evidence indicates progress in building QI capacity and improving processes and patient experience across participating FQHCs. Future iterations should address barriers to improvement identified here. Additional work is needed to compare the efficacy of this approach to other collaborative modes.

Engagement With Project ECHO to Increase Medication-Assisted Treatment in Rural Primary Care.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to understand the barriers and facilitators that affect engagement with Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) to implement medication-assisted treatment (MAT) in primary care settings. METHODS: A 12-session weekly curriculum was delivered to participating primary care providers and clinic staff (N=24 participants from 13 clinics). Participants completed attendance logs and a qualitative interview in order to identify factors that influence engagement in the ECHO sessions and the potential integration of MAT. RESULTS: Primary care providers and staff valued the ECHO sessions, but overall attendance was low and variable. Participants generally valued the didactic and interactive nature of the sessions but identified system-level constraints that limited engagement. Major barriers to participation included competing demands in patient care and the low degree of endorsement by clinic leadership. CONCLUSIONS: This brief report identifies key systematic challenges that may directly limit primary care providers' engagement in telementoring models such as Project ECHO.