Effect of Oral Valproic Acid vs Placebo for Vision Loss in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Randomized Phase 2 Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Importance: There are no approved drug treatments for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa, a relentlessly progressive cause of adult and childhood blindness. Objectives: To evaluate the potential efficacy and assess the safety of orally administered valproic acid (VPA) in the treatment of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, phase 2, prospective, interventional, placebo-controlled, double-masked randomized clinical trial. The study took place in 6 US academic retinal degeneration centers. Individuals with genetically characterized autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa were randomly assigned to receive treatment or placebo for 12 months. Analyses were intention-to-treat. Interventions: Oral VPA 500 mg to 1000 mg daily for 12 months or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was determined prior to study initiation as the change in visual field area (assessed by the III4e isopter, semiautomated kinetic perimetry) between baseline and month 12. Results: The mean (SD) age of the 90 participants was 50.4 (11.6) years. Forty-four (48.9%) were women, 87 (96.7%) were white, and 79 (87.8%) were non-Hispanic. Seventy-nine participants (87.8%) completed the study (42 [95.5%] received placebo and 37 [80.4%] received VPA). Forty-two (46.7%) had a rhodopsin mutation. Most adverse events were mild, although 7 serious adverse events unrelated to VPA were reported. The difference between the VPA and placebo arms for mean change in the primary outcome was -150.43 degree2 (95% CI, -290.5 to -10.03; P = .035). Conclusions and Relevance: This negative value indicates that the VPA arm had worse outcomes than the placebo group. This study brings to light the key methodological considerations that should be applied to the rigorous evaluation of treatments for these conditions. This study does not provide support for the use of VPA in the treatment of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01233609.

Effects of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Two studies were conducted to investigate whether the pharmacokinetics of the atypical antipsychotic aripiprazole were altered in individuals with hepatic or renal impairment compared with those with normal hepatic or renal function. STUDY DESIGN: Two open-label, single-dose studies. STUDY SETTING: Clinical research unit. PATIENTS: Study 1: Subjects with normal hepatic function (n = 6) and subjects with hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class A [mild, n = 8], B [moderate, n = 8] or C [severe, n = 3]). Study 2: Subjects with normal renal function (creatinine clearance >80 mL/min; n = 7) and subjects with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min; n = 6). TREATMENT: Single oral dose of aripiprazole 15 mg. PHARMACOKINETIC ANALYSES: Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using plasma aripiprazole and dehydro-aripiprazole concentration-time data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Study 1 (hepatic impairment study): apparent oral clearance of unbound drug (CL/Fu) and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of aripiprazole; Study 2 (renal impairment study): CL/Fu, Cmax and renal clearance (CL(R)). Safety assessments included 12-lead ECGs, vital sign monitoring, clinical laboratory measurements and assessment of adverse events.f RESULTS: In the hepatic impairment study, the mean total Cmax of aripiprazole was significantly lower in subjects with severe hepatic impairment compared with those with normal hepatic function (p = 0.04). The fraction of aripiprazole unbound (fu) was significantly greater for subjects with mild (p = 0.02) or severe hepatic impairment (p < 0.01) but not for those with moderate hepatic impairment (p = 0.09) compared with healthy controls. There were no meaningful differences in either the Cmax of unbound aripiprazole or CL/Fu between groups. The mean CL(R) of aripiprazole was negligible (0.04 mL/h/kg in controls and 0.19 mL/h/kg in patients with severe hepatic impairment). In the renal impairment study, the mean total Cmax values were numerically higher (approximately 40%) and the area under the plasma aripiprazole concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity was lower (approximately 19%) in renally impaired subjects versus those with normal renal function; the fu was comparable between groups. Aripiprazole CL(R) was approximately 3-fold higher in renally impaired subjects, but this difference was not statistically significant. No deaths or serious adverse events were reported during either study. CONCLUSION: A single aripiprazole 15-mg dose was well tolerated. There were no meaningful differences in aripiprazole pharmacokinetics between groups of subjects with normal hepatic or renal function and those with either hepatic or renal impairment. Adjustment of the aripiprazole dose does not appear to be required in populations with hepatic or renal impairment.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between tolvaptan, a non-peptide AVP antagonist, and furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide.

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between tolvaptan and furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were determined in a single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, 3-period crossover study conducted in healthy white (Caucasian) men. A total of 12 subjects were enrolled in the study, with 6 subjects assigned to each of two treatment arms. Subjects in Arm 1 received 30 mg of tolvaptan, 80 mg of furosemide, and 30 mg of tolvaptan + 80 mg of furosemide. Subjects in Arm 2 received 30 mg of tolvaptan, 100 mg of HCTZ, and 30 mg pf tolvaptan + 100 mg of HCTZ. Doses were separated by a 48-hour washout. Blood and urine samples were collected at scheduled timepoints during the 24 hours after administration of study drug for the determination of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. No clinically significant changes were noted in the pharmacokinetic profiles of tolvaptan and furosemide or tolvaptan and HCTZ when coadministered. Free water clearance, 24-hour urine volume, plasma sodium and argentine vasopressin concentrations, and plasma osmolality were higher, and urine osmolality was lower when tolvaptan was administered either alone or in combination with furosemide or HCTZ, compared with furosemide or HCTZ administered alone. At 24 hours postdose, plasma renin activity was increased after furosemide or HCTZ administered alone or with tolvaptan, but it was unchanged after tolvaptan alone. Tolvaptan did not significantly affect the natriuretic activity of furosemide or HCTZ. Furosemide and HCTZ did not significantly affect the aquaretic activity of tolvaptan. Tolvaptan administered alone or in combination with furosemide or HCTZ was safe and well tolerated at the given doses.

Tolvaptan administration does not affect steady state amiodarone concentrations in patients with cardiac arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Tolvaptan, a nonpeptide selective vasopressin receptor (V2) antagonist, is in development for the treatment of congestive heart failure and hyponatremia. Tolvaptan is primarily metabolized via CYP3A4. This study was conducted to determine the extent of the pharmacokinetic interaction between tolvaptan and steady state amiodarone, an antiarrhythmic drug commonly prescribed for patients with congestive heart failure and a known inhibitor of other drugs metabolized by CYP3A4. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, 1-arm, 3-period, sequential treatment study conducted in 11 men (10) and women aged 49 to 80 years. They were primarily Caucasian (20) subjects, with a history of cardiac arrhythmias who were otherwise healthy. Subjects were to have been on oral amiodarone maintenance therapy of 200 mg/day for at least 10 months. All subjects took 200 mg amiodarone once daily on each study day; on days 3 and 4, they were also coadministered 30 and 90 mg of tolvaptan, respectively. The plasma concentrations of amiodarone and its metabolite desethylamiodarone were determined for 24 hours postdose on days 2, 3, and 4, tolvaptan concentrations were determined for 24 hours postdose on days 3 and 4. RESULTS: As determined by the ratio of the geometric means and 90% confidence intervals (0.5 to 2.0) for the maximal plasma concentration and the area under the curve during the dosing interval for both amiodarone and desethylamiodarone, tolvaptan coadministration had no effect on either amiodarone and desethylamiodarone disposition, as all the geometric mean ratios (amiodarone + tolvaptan [30 or 90 mg] vs amiodarone alone) were approximately 1. CONCLUSION: Tolvaptan coadministration does not alter steady-state amiodarone or desethylamiodarone concentrations. Tolvaptan concentrations did not appear to be different from historical controls. The most frequently reported adverse event was polyuria (15 of 21 subjects for amiodarone + 30 mg tolvaptan); an expected outcome due to the known potent aquaretic action of tolvaptan. The combination of amiodarone and tolvaptan was well tolerated.

Comparison of two doses and dosing regimens of tolvaptan in congestive heart failure.

Fluid retention and extracellular volume expansion are frequently encountered complications of congestive heart failure (HF) that can cause morbidity and mortality. Tolvaptan (Otsuka) is an orally administered nonpeptide vasopressin (VP) V2 receptor antagonist that inhibits water reabsorption in the kidney by competitively blocking VP binding, resulting in water diuresis without significantly changing total electrolyte excretion. In the 24-hour period following a 30-mg dose of tolvaptan, urine excretion rate increases and declines as plasma concentrations rise and fall; this uneven effect results in 80% of daily urine output in the first 12 hours. Therefore, the current study was designed to assess the pharmacodynamic effects, pharmacokinetics, and clinical safety of tolvaptan 30 mg QD plus placebo versus 15 mg BID over 7 days in patients with NYHA Class II/III heart failure and persistent fluid overload, SBP > or = 90 mm Hg, and a serum creatinine < or = 3.0 mg/dL. Patients were withdrawn from diuretics for 48 hours before randomization. Statistics were performed with ANCOVA for continuous variables and Mantel-Haenszel mean score test stratified by center for categorical variables. Thirty-nine of 40 patients completed days 1 and 7. There were no significant clinical, pharmacokinetic, or pharmacodynamic differences between the dosing regimens over time. Based on these findings, tolvaptan 30 mg was chosen as the comparator for placebo in a large phase 3 survival trial.

Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of aripiprazole following multiple oral dosing in normal healthy volunteers.

Two 14-day, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies evaluated the fasting pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of aripiprazole, a new antipsychotic, in healthy male subjects. In Study 1, 37 subjects were randomized to aripiprazole 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, or placebo once daily. In Study 2, 11 subjects were randomized to aripiprazole, titrated from 10 to 30 mg/day, or placebo. Aripiprazole had linear pharmacokinetics over 5 to 30 mg/day, which were described by a two-compartment open model, with first-order absorption. In Study 1, mean elimination half-life ranged from 47 to 68 hours with aripiprazole, with apparent systemic clearance (CL/F) of approximately 3.45 L/h. In Study 2, mean elimination half-life was 59 hours (CL/F approximately 4.0 L/h). Adverse events were generally mild to moderate, were transient in nature, and commonly occurred within the first 3 days of dosing. Clinical laboratory assessments, electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram, and prolactin levels showed no clinically significant changes during the studies.

Extended application of an LC-MS/MS method for the analysis of vesnarinone and its metabolites in human urine and dialysate fluid.

Vesnarinone, a positive inotropic drug developed for congestive heart failure, and its metabolites (OPC-8230, OPC-18136, OPC-18137) were analyzed in human dialysate and urine (plus an additional metabolite: OPC-18692 in urine) samples using a modification to a previously published LC-MS/MS assay for the analysis of human plasma and urine samples. OPC-8192, a structural analogue of vesnarinone, was used as the internal standard. The analytes of interest were extracted from human dialysate or urine by a solid phase extraction method using a pre-conditioned C-18 extraction column. The analytes were then resolved by a 7 min gradient elution on a reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic column. Vesnarinone and metabolites were detected on a PE/Sciex API III+Biomolecular Mass analyzer in MS/MS mode using a Turbo IonSpray interface. The linear range of quantitation in dialysate was 2.00-100.00 ng/ml for vesnarinone and 0.50-25.00 ng/ml for each metabolite. In urine, the linear range was of 0.50-25.00 microg/ml for vesnarinone and 0.10-5.00 microg/ml for the metabolites. This method was used to support the analysis of urine and dialysate samples from renally impaired patients who are on vesnarinone treatment.

Clinical considerations in study designs that use cotinine as a biomarker.

Subjects enrolled in studies are not always screened for routine habits such as smoking. Personal history is not always reliable and therefore an objective biomarker is necessary to screen for smokers. The objectives of this article were to review the metabolism of nicotine and other metabolic considerations associated with smoking; to review some of the routine methods used to assess exposure to nicotine-containing products; to revisit cotinine breakpoints utilized to distinguish smokers from non-smokers during screening for clinical trials; to assess the utility of screening questions regarding smoking practices; and to recommend standards for clinical pharmacology studies. The results indicated that cotinine levels serve as a useful biomarker of tobacco exposure; racial issues may be clinically relevant in determining smoking status; cessation of smoking should occur at least 14 days prior to the start of the study; adverse effects from nicotine withdrawal such as craving, hunger and weight gain may persist for more than 6 months; potential metabolic interactions via cytochrome P2A6 and P1A2 need to be considered when designing a study; and the use of a single calibrator as a breakpoint is acceptable if a categorical outcome such as 'smoker' versus 'non-smoker' is desired. Nicotine from food products is not expected to impact assay sensitivity or to be clinically relevant; a serum cotinine concentration of 10 ng ml(-1) be employed as a breakpoint for non-smokers versus smokers; other non-invasive alternatives are collection of urine, saliva, or hair (with suggested breakpoints of 200 ng ml(-1), 5 ng ml(-1) and 0.3 ng mg(-1), respectively; screening questions be accompanied by testing for cotinine; and the inclusion of smokers in studies should be considered once the impact of smoking on the targeted population is understood.

The pharmacokinetics of toborinone in subjects with congestive heart failure and concomitant renal impairment and/or concomitant hepatic impairment.

The pharmacokinetics of toborinone was studied in subjects with congestive heart failure (CHF) and concomitant renal and/or hepatic disease. At the time of admission, subjects were grouped based on estimated creatinine clearance and serum bilirubin. Glomerular filtration rate was assessed using iothalamate clearance. Hepatic function was assessed using the caffeine metabolism test and indocyanine green clearance. No significant differences were observed in mean toborinone pharmacokinetic parameters among the four study groups. Positive correlations were observed between toborinone clearance and the measured indices of renal and hepatic function: creatinine clearance, iothalamate renal clearance, paraxanthine/caffeine ratio, and indocyanine green clearance. Toborinone clearance decreased with decreasing creatinine clearance, decreasing glomerular filtration rate, decreasing demethylation metabolic activity, and decreasing hepatic bloodflow, although no significant differences were observed in any mean toborinone pharmacokinetic parameters evaluated among the four study groups.

A sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for the determination of dextromethorphan and metabolites in human urine--application for drug interaction studies assessing potential CYP3A and CYP2D6 inhibition.

The commonly used antitussive dextromethorphan can be used to simultaneously assess potential cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and CYP2D6 inhibition during drug development. The metabolism of dextromethorphan to dextrorphan and subsequently to 3-hydroxymorphinan are via the 2D6 pathway, while the metabolism of dextromethorphan to 3-methoxymorphinan is via the 3A pathway. A sensitive and specific LC-MS/MS assay has been developed to determine the human urine concentrations of dextromethorphan and three metabolites (dextrorphan, 3-methoxymorphinan and 3-hydroxymorphinan) in support of drug interaction studies. Urine samples (0.5 ml), after enzymatic hydrolysis of the conjugates and containing 3-ethylmorphine as an internal standard, were extracted with chloroform under basic conditions. Following concentration and reconstitution, the samples were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The assay was linear over the range of 5.00-500 ng/ml for dextromethorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan; and 200-3000 ng/ml for dextrorphan and 3-hydroxymorphinan using a Perkin-Elmer Sciex triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (API 300). The intra- and inter-day relative standard deviation (RSD) across three validation runs over the entire concentration range for all analytes was less than 15%. Accuracy determined at three or four concentrations (9.00, 200, and 400 ng/ml for dextromethorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan; 250, 400, 1300 and 2500 ng/ml for dextrorphan and 3-hydroxymorphinan) ranged between 96.3 and 113.8%. The stability of analytes in urine was demonstrated for 9 months at -20 degrees C, 24 h under ambient conditions and for up to three freeze/thaw cycles. The method described herein is suitable for the rapid and efficient measurement of dextromethorphan and different metabolites to estimate potential CYP3A inhibition by drug candidates and for screening of extensive and poor metabolizers of CYP2D6 in the heterogeneous population. The method has subsequently been validated on a Sciex API 3000 with lower limit of quantitation; 1.00 ng/ml for dextromethorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan; 60.0 ng/ml for dextrorphan and 100 ng/ml for 3-hydroxymorphinan.

Dopamine D2 and D3 receptor occupancy in normal humans treated with the antipsychotic drug aripiprazole (OPC 14597): a study using positron emission tomography and [11C]raclopride.

Aripiprazole (OPC 14597) is an antipsychotic drug that has high affinity for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors and the dopamine autoreceptor. It is being developed for treatment of patients with schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a dose response following graduated doses of aripiprazole could be quantified and correlated with its occupancy of the D2 and D3 dopamine receptors in the brain of living humans. Dopamine D2 and D3 receptor occupancy in fifteen normal male human brains was measured using positron emission tomography (PET) with [11C]raclopride. PET studies were performed before and after two weeks of administration of aripiprazole. The dopamine D2 receptor occupancy was quantified with two kinetic modeling methods without using a blood input function. Administration of aripiprazole for 14 days resulted in a dose-dependent receptor occupancy between 40 - 95% after the administration of 0.5mg, 1 mg, 2 mg, 10 mg, and 30 mg per day. These results suggest that an adequate occupancy can be obtained, and this may be useful to predict an appropriate therapeutic dose for an individual patient. Interestingly, even at striatal D2 receptor occupancy values above 90%, which occurred with the higher doses, extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) were not observed. This underlines aripiprazole's unique mechanism of action as a partial dopamine receptor agonist, which might become a novel principle in the treatment of schizophrenia.

The effects of concomitant administration of theophylline and toborinone on the pharmacokinetics of both compounds in poor and extensive metabolizers via CYP2D6.

This study investigated the effects of the concomitant administration of theophylline and toborinone on the pharmacokinetics of both compounds in poor and extensive metabolizers via CYP2D6. In period 1, a single dose of 3.5 mg/kg theophylline was administered orally. In period 2, a single dose of 1.0 microg/kg/min toborinone was infused over 6 hours. In period 3, 3.5 mg/kg theophylline was coadministered with 1.0 microg/kg/min toborinone. Serial blood and pooled urine samples were collected before and after toborinone administration for the quantification of toborinone and its metabolites in plasma and urine. Serial blood samples were collected before and after theophylline administration for the quantification of theophylline and its metabolites in plasma. No significant differences were observed in toborinone pharmacokinetics between poor and extensive metabolizers via CYP2D6. Toborinone coadministration with theophylline did not result in a substantive effect on the disposition of theophylline and vice versa.