A combination of burn wound injury and Pseudomonas infection elicits unique gene expression that enhances bacterial pathogenicity.

Burns are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide with the most common cause of death resulting from sepsis, often from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We previously reported that a non-lethal flame burn induced an altered host immune response. Using this model, gene expression in both the murine host and P. aeruginosa was measured using a NanoString custom probe panel. We observed differing patterns of gene expression in both host and P. aeruginosa in the skin, blood, liver, and spleen of mice that were burned and/or infected, compared to mice that were neither burned nor infected (i.e., Sham). In mice that were both burned and infected (B/I), we observed changes in gene expression in both the host and P. aeruginosa that were distinct from all other treatment conditions. These data suggest that the combination of the burned state and superimposed infection affects both host and pathogen gene expression to increase infection propensity. Gene transcription significantly changed from 6 to 24 h post-B/I in each tissue. Finally, inhibiting IL-10 signaling or co-administering arginine at the time of P. aeruginosa infection prolonged or restored survival in an otherwise 100% fatal burn and infection model. These findings suggest that disease states such as burns may differentially alter innate immune response gene expression in both a host- and pathogen-specific manner.IMPORTANCEThe interaction between an underlying disease process and a specific pathogen may lead to the unique expression of genes that affect bacterial pathogenesis. These genes may not be observed during infection in the absence of, or with a different underlying process or infection during the underlying process with a different pathogen. To test this hypothesis, we used Nanostring technology to compare gene transcription in a murine-burned wound infected with P. aeruginosa. The Nanostring probeset allowed the simultaneous direct comparison of immune response gene expression in both multiple host tissues and P. aeruginosa in conditions of burn alone, infection alone, and burn with infection. While RNA-Seq is used to discover novel transcripts, NanoString could be a technique to monitor specific changes in transcriptomes between samples and bypass the additional adjustments for multispecies sample processing or the need for the additional steps of alignment and assembly required for RNASeq. Using Nanostring, we identified arginine and IL-10 as important contributors to the lethal outcome of burned mice infected with P. aeruginosa. While other examples of altered gene transcription are in the literature, our study suggests that a more systematic comparison of gene expression in various underlying diseases during infection with specific bacterial pathogens may lead to the identification of unique host-pathogen interactions and result in more precise therapeutic interventions.

Genome sequencing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain M2 illuminates traits of an opportunistic pathogen of burn wounds.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative nosocomial pathogen and one of the most prevalent organisms isolated from burn wounds worldwide. Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain M2 (O5 serotype, type B flagella) is utilized for examining the murine model associated with burns. Pseudomonas aeruginosa M2 is similar in lethality to common laboratory P. aeruginosa strains when infecting CD-1 mice. Conversely, we recently showed that, relative to these strains, P. aeruginosa M2-infected mice are more susceptible to sepsis and demonstrate a 6-log reduction in LD50 from subcutaneous infection at the infection site directly after 10% total body surface area burn. To better understand this striking phenotypic difference from other P. aeruginosa strains employed in burn models, we sequenced the P. aeruginosa M2 genome. A total of 4,136,641 read pairs were obtained, providing an average genome coverage of 97.5X; subsequent assembly yielded a draft genome with 187 contigs comprising 6,360,304 bp with a G + C content of 66.45%. Genome-based phylogeny estimation of 92 P. aeruginosa strains placed P. aeruginosa M2 with P. aeruginosa-12-4-4(59), a nonairway clinical strain isolated from the blood culture of a burn patient. Phylogenomic analyses identified genes shared between P. aeruginosa M2 and P. aeruginosa 14, another strain exhibiting increased lethality in thermal tissues, as well as P. aeruginosa M2 unique genes with diverse functions like degradation of toxic aromatic compounds, iron scavenging, swarming motility and biofilm formation, defense against invasive DNA, and host assault. Predicted lateral gene transfers illuminate proteins heretofore uncharacterized for roles in P. aeruginosa biology. Our work yields a rich resource for assessing P. aeruginosa genes required for increased lethality in burn tissue seroma.

Deployment of the 1st Area Medical Laboratory in a Split-Based Configuration During the Largest Ebola Outbreak in History.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Army 1st Area Medical Laboratory (1st AML) is currently the only deployable medical CBRNE (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives) laboratory in the Army's Forces Command. In support of the United States Agency for International Development Ebola response, the U.S. military initiated Operation United Assistance (OUA), and deployed approximately 2,500 service members to support the Government of Liberia's Ebola control efforts. Due to its unique molecular diagnostic and expeditionary capabilities, the 1st AML was ordered to deploy in October of 2014 in support of OUA via establishment of Ebola testing laboratories. To meet the unique mission requirements of OUA, the unit was re-organized to operate in a split-based configuration and sustain four separate Ebola testing laboratories. METHODS: This article is a review of the 1st AML's OUA participation in a split-based configuration. Topics highlighted include pre-deployment planning/training, operational/logistical considerations in fielding/withdrawing laboratories, laboratory testing results, disease and non-battle injuries, and lessons learned. FINDINGS: Fielding the 1st AML in a split-based configuration required careful pre-deployment planning, additional training, optimal use of personnel, and the acquisition of additional laboratory equipment. Challenges in establishing and sustaining remote laboratories in Liberia included: difficulties in transportation of equipment due to poor road infrastructure, heavy equipment unloading, and equipment damage during transit. Between November 26, 2014 and February 18, 2015 the four 1st AML labs successfully tested blood samples from patients and oral swabs collected by burial teams in rural Liberia. The most significant equipment malfunction during laboratory operations was generators powering the labs, with the same problem impacting headquarters. Generator failures delayed laboratory operations/result reporting, and put temperature sensitive reagents at risk. None of the 22 1st AML soldiers (at remote labs or headquarters) had an Ebola exposure, none were infected with malaria or other tropical diseases, and none required evacuation from the time deployed to remote sites. The primary medical condition encountered was acute gastroenteritis, and within the first week of arrival to Liberia, 19 (86%) soldiers were affected. DISCUSSION/IMPACT/RECOMMENDATIONS: With proper planning and training, the 1st AML can successfully conduct split-based operations in an outbreak setting, and this capability can be utilized in future operations. The performance of the 1st AML during the current Ebola outbreak highlights the value of this asset, and the need to continue its evolution to support U.S. military operations.