Effect of respiratory Achromobacter spp. infection on pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis.

PURPOSE: Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients are susceptible to infection with Achromobacter spp., although its clinical significance remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of infection with Achromobacter spp. in CF patients. METHODS: CF outpatients with multiple sputum cultures and follow-up lung function tests were assigned to the case group (infected with Achromobacter spp.) or the control group (never infected with Achromobacter spp.) according to the isolation of Achromobacter spp. The Achromobacter spp. group included two subgroups, taking into consideration whether the isolation of Achromobacter spp. was intermittent or chronic. Baseline lung function tests and longitudinal behaviour were examined in relation to Achromobacter spp. status. RESULTS: A total of 190 CF patients were treated from January 2003 to December 2015 in the CF unit and 21 (11 %) had at least one positive culture for Achromobacter spp. Of these, 11/21 (52.4 %) patients were chronically infected with Achromobacter spp. An analysis of changes during follow-up showed the annual rate of FEV1 decline: -2.3±1.6 % in the Achromobacter spp. group compared to -1.1±0.9 % (P=0.02) in the control group. The chronically infected group also had a significantly greater decline in FEV1 compared to the control group (-2.9±1.9 vs -1.1±0.9; P=0.04). The mean number of annual pulmonary exacerbations during the study period was significantly higher in the case group (1.9±0.9 vs 1.1±0.8; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The Achromobacter spp. status in CF shows a trend towards more severe airflow obstruction and an association with accelerated decline in lung function parameters.

Amantadine for fatigue in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is one of the most common and disabling symptoms of people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The effective management of fatigue has an important impact on the patient's functioning, abilities, and quality of life. Although a number of strategies have been devised for reducing fatigue, treatment recommendations are based on a limited amount of scientific evidence. Many textbooks report amantadine as a first-choice drug for MS-related fatigue because of published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showing some benefit. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of amantadine in treating fatigue in people with MS. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane MS Group Trials Register (July 2006), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2006), EMBASE (January 1974 to July 2006), bibliographies of relevant articles and handsearched relevant journals. We also contacted drug companies and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised, placebo or other drugs-controlled, double-blind trials of amantadine in MS people with fatigue. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers selected studies for inclusion in the review and they extracted the data reported in the original articles. We requested missing and unclear data by correspondence with the trial's principal investigator. A meta-analysis was not performed due to the inadequacy of available data and heterogeneity of outcome measures. MAIN RESULTS: Out of 13 pertinent publications, 5 trials met the criteria for inclusion in this review: one study was a parallel arms study, and 4 were crossover trials. The number of randomised participants ranged between 10 and 115, and a total of 272 MS patients were studied. Overall the quality of the studies considered was poor and all trials were open to bias. All studies reported small and inconsistent improvements in fatigue, whereas the clinical relevance of these findings and the impact on patient's functioning and health related quality of life remained undetermined. The number of participants reporting side effects during amantadine therapy ranged from 10% to 57%. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of amantadine in reducing fatigue in people with MS is poorly documented, as well as its tolerability. It is advisable to: (1) improve knowledge on the underlying mechanisms of MS-related fatigue; (2) achieve anagreement on accurate, reliable and responsive outcome measures of fatigue; (3) perform good quality RCTs.

Limitaciones metodológicas en la realización de estudios que comparan técnicas de hemodiálisis / Methodologic limitations in studies that try to compare different modalities of hemodialysis

No disponible

Treatments for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a rapid and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an important problem both for people with the disease and for society. There is no cure, and alleviation of symptoms forms the cornerstone of care. Excessive fatigue that severely limits activity is experienced by at least two-thirds of the estimated 60,000 people with MS in the UK. OBJECTIVES: (1) To identify current treatments for fatigue in MS and their evidence-base. (2) To systematically review the evidence for those treatments that have been investigated in more than one rigorous study, in order to determine their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: The review was carried out in two stages: a formal scoping review (to assess the range of interventions used by people with MS), and a systematic review for treatments that had been identified as promising and that had been investigated in clinical trials (as identified in the scoping review). A systematic review of research on costs and cost-effectiveness of those interventions identified as promising was also performed. Electronic databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, were searched for the period 1991-June 1999 (scoping review) and 1966-December 1999 (systematic review). Reference lists from publications were also searched, and experts were contacted for any additional information not already identified. RESULTS: Interventions identified for the treatment of fatigue in MS (1) Behavioural advice. This is the main element of initial clinical management and no rigorous research of its effectiveness was identified. (2) Drugs (amantadine, pemoline, potassium-channel blockers and antidepressants). (3) Training, rehabilitation and devices (cooling vests and electromagnetic fields). (4) Alternative therapies (bee venom, cannabis, acupuncture/acupressure and yoga). Only two drugs, amantadine and pemoline, met the criteria for full systematic review. RESULTS - EFFECTIVENESS OF AMANTADINE: One parallel and three crossover trials were found, involving a total of 236 people with MS. All studies were open to bias. All studies showed a pattern in favour of amantadine compared with placebo, but there is considerable uncertainty about the validity and clinical significance of this finding. This pattern of benefit was considerably undermined when different assumptions were used in the sensitivity analysis. RESULTS - EFFECTIVENESS OF PEMOLINE: One parallel and one crossover trial were found involving a total of 126 people with MS. Both studies were open to bias. There was no overall tendency in favour of pemoline over placebo and an excess of reports of adverse effects with pemoline. RESULTS - HEALTH ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: The drug costs of amantadine and pemoline are modest (pound 200 and pound 80 per annum, respectively). No economic evaluations were identified in the systematic review, and available data were insufficient to allow modelling of cost-effectiveness in this rapid review. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to allow people with MS, clinicians or policy makers to make informed decisions on the appropriate use of the many treatments on offer. Only amantadine appears to have some proven ability to alleviate the fatigue in MS, though only a proportion of users will obtain benefit and then only some of these patients will benefit sufficiently to take the drug in the long term. CONCLUSIONS - RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RESEARCH: The frequency, severity and impact of fatigue, the poverty of available research, and the absence of any ongoing research, suggest that new research is an urgent priority. People with MS, clinicians and policy makers should work together to ensure that the evidence required is collected as quickly as possible by encouraging involvement in rigorous research. Research should not be restricted to the two drugs reviewed in depth in this report. All interventions identified in the scoping review (see above) should be considered, as should basic scientific research into the underlying mechanism of fatigue in MS.