Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Access Occlusion Using the Amplatzer Vascular Plug in Patients with Intractable Arm Edema.

OBJECTIVES: Vascular occlusion of hemodialysis arteriovenous access (AVA) using an Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP; St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) is an arising and alternative practice in selected patients; however, few reported cases can be found in the literature. Herein, we report on our experience with endovascular treatment of complicated AVA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2015 to December 2016, 3 patients at our clinic underwent an occlusion of hemodialysis AVA with 2 different Amplatzer vascular plugs: 2 patients with type II and 1 patient with type IV. Of these, 1 patient was treated for an autologous radiocephalic fistula, the second patient was treated for an autologous brachiocephalic fistula located at the elbow, and the third was, instead, treated for a radiocephalic forearm fistula. The reason for closing the AVA in all patients was due to the presence of dialysis-associated steal syndrome with critical hand ischemia and intractable ipsilateral edema. RESULTS: All AVAs were treated using an AVP. No plug migration, access revascularization, persistent ischemia, nor other complications were observed. CONCLUSION: This report suggests that the use of AVP for embolization of complicated AVA is a safe and reasonable alternative to open surgery in selected patients.

Quality of life of hemodialysis patients in Central and Southern Italy: cross-sectional comparison between Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) and Bicarbonate Hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: in hemodialysis (HD) patients, poor health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) is prevalent and associated with adverse outcomes. HR-QoL is strictly linked to nutritional status of HD patients. Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) is an alternative dialysis technique that combines diffusion, convection and absorption. It reduces burden of inflammation and malnutrition and this effect may cause beneficial effect on HR-QoL. However no data on HR-QoL in HFR is currently available. METHODS: we designed a cross-sectional multicentre study in order to compare the HR-QoL in patients treated with HFR versus Bicarbonate HD (BHD). We enrolled adult patients HFR treated for at least 6 months, with life expectancy greater than six months and without overt cognitive deficit. The recruited patients in HFR were matched for age, gender, dialytic vintage and performance in activities of daily living (Barthel index) with BHD treated patients. SF-36 questionnaire for the assessment of HR-QoL was administered. RESULTS: one hundred fourteen patients (57 HFR vs 57 BHD) were enrolled (age 65.413.5 years; dialysis vintage 5.4 (3.3-10.3) years; 53% males) from 18 dialysis non-profit centres in central and southern Italy. As result of matching, no difference in age, gender, dialytic age and Barthel index was found between HFR and BHD patients. In HFR patients we observed better values of physical component score (PCS) of SF-36 than BHD patients (P=0.048), whereas no significant difference emerged in the mental component score (P=0.698). In particular HFR patients were associated with higher Physical Functioning (P=0.045) and Role Physical (P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: HFR is associated with better physical component of HR-QoL than BHD, independently of age, gender, dialysis vintage and invalidity score. Whether these findings translate into a survival benefit must be investigated by longitudinal studies.

[Home Hemodialysis: Experience and Preliminary Results Of The First Center In Campania].

The Home Hemodialysis (HHD) is an uncommon dialytic option that can offer better clinical outcomes and a more satisfactory quality of life. The Health Plan of the Region Campania 2011-2013 states that" the system of home care for regional planning is particularly important". From August 2014 to March 2015 two patients, on standard dialysis (HD) as inpatients at Dialysis Centre of the University "Federico II" of Naples, started Short Daily Home Hemodialysis (SDHD) (4-6 dialysis treatments%week, 2.5 hours per session) using the portable cycler NxStage System One). The data collected showed that the clinical benefits described in the literature were confirmed in patients enrolled in this HHD program. Shorter and more frequent hemodialysis sessions allowed a significant reduction in interdialytic weight gain and greater intradialytic hemodynamic stability. A significant reduction in blood pressure and anti-hypertensive drugs were obtained. The control of phosphorus appeared better and hemoglobin was to target with a lower dose of weekly erythropoetin. The patients reported a greater well-being and a reduction in post-dialytic asthenia. No problem has been reported in using the vascular access (CVC and FAV) by the patient%caregiver. The dialysis adequacy and efficiency were comparable between SDHD and HD. The experience with the HHD is encouraging as the patients achieved an adequate dialysis dose without any complications reporting an improving sense of well-being and a better quality of life.

[Technical- rganizational and Welfare Aspects Of The First Home Hemodialysis Program in Campania].

To activate a program of home hemodialysis (HHD) and to ensure its sustainability and success, it is essential to provide a structured path with the realization of a programmatic document detailing the technological requirements and the type of organization and assistance in line with the regulations currently in force. The path must consider the following: (a) eligibility clinical criteria of the patient and the caregiver, (b) analysis of the most recent HHD literature and the reasons of the choice of the latest technology, (c) accurate information of the patient and the caregiver with their approval, (d) care coverage and hospital admission modalities (e) suitability of the rooms where the patient will perform the HHD treatment, (f) training program of the patient and the caregiver, home treatment start and patient follow-up. The implementation of this structured process has allowed us to launch a successful HHD program: this modus operandi has preventively defined the pathway care and analyzed the priorities of risk. We have analyzed the HHD process to identify the possible problems and predictable critical situations in home health care. The experience with the HHD is promising: the patients did not show any clinical problems and reported a better quality of life; this dialysis method can be considered as further treatment option to selected patients, according to the eligibility criteria.

Evidence that p-cresol and IL-6 are adsorbed by the HFR cartridge: towards a new strategy to decrease systemic inflammation in dialyzed patients?

INTRODUCTION: Hemodialysis (HD) and hemodiafiltration clear only with a low efficiency the plasma from interleukin-6 and p-cresol, two protein-bound uremic toxins associated with high cardiovascular risk in end stage renal disease. HFR Supra is a double-chamber hemodiafiltration system in which the ultrafiltrate returns to the patient after its regeneration through a resin cartridge that binds hydrophobic and protein-bound solutes. In the present study, we evaluated whether the HFR cartridge can also bind total p-cresol and IL-6 and remove them from the ultrafiltrate. METHODS: We compared the levels of IL-6 and p-cresol in ultrafiltrate samples collected at the inlet (UFin) and at the outlet (UFout) of the cartridge at the start or at the end of a 240 min HFR session in 12 inflamed chronic HD patients. The pro-inflammatory activity of the ultrafiltrate samples was also determined by evaluating the changes that they induced in IL-6 mRNA expression and protein release in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 12 healthy volunteers. IL-6 and p-cresol circulating levels were also assessed in peripheral plasma blood samples collected before and after HFR and, for comparison, a control HD. RESULTS: p-Cresol and IL-6 were lower in UFout than in UFin both at the start and at the end of the HFR session, suggesting that they were retained by the cartridge. IL-6 mRNA expression and release were lower in PBMC incubated with UFout collected at the end than with UFin collected at the start of HFR, suggesting that passage through the cartridge reduced UF pro-inflammatory activity. Plasma total p-cresol decreased by about 53% after HFR, and 37% after HD. IL-6 circulating values were unmodified by either these dialysis procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the HFR-Supra cartridge retains total p-cresol and IL-6 in the ultrafiltrate and lowers plasma total p cresol but not IL-6 levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01865773.

Pulse pressure and presence of coronary artery calcification.

BACKGROUND: Coronary calcification (CAC) is found in early stages of CKD. Pulse pressure (PP) predicts CAC in dialysis patients. This study evaluates the accuracy of PP in predicting CAC in patients not yet on dialysis (CKD patients). METHODS: CKD patients (n = 388) underwent coronary calcium score (CAC score) and abdominal x-ray (n = 128) for estimating aorta calcification (AAC). Biochemistry and PP were measured every 3 and 6 months in patients with stage 4 to 5 and 2 to 3 CKD, respectively. The accuracy of PP and AAC was assessed by receiver operating characteristics analysis. RESULTS: PP correlated with CAC score in the whole cohort and in patients with stages 2 to 3 and stages 4 to 5 CKD. PP >60 mmHg predicted CAC score >0 (OR: 2.14; P < 0.001), > or =100 (OR: 2.92; P < 0.001), > or =400 (OR: 6.17; P < 0.001) after multivariable adjustment. Area under the curve (AUC) was 0.626 for CAC score >0, 0.676 for score >100, and 0.746 for score >400. PP >60 mmHg reduced the rate of event-free survival. AAC was found in 58% of patients and correlated with CAC score. AUC was 0.628 for CAC score >0, 0.652 for score >100, 0.831 for score >400. CONCLUSION: PP may identify CKD patients with subclinical CAC who need further evaluation. Accuracy of PP and AAC is nearly similar in predicting CAC. High PP indicates vessel wall alterations leading to adverse outcome.