Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Neural Eng ; 13(5): 056012, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27578310

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: While motor-imagery based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been studied over many years by now, most of these studies have taken place in controlled lab settings. Bringing BCI technology into everyday life is still one of the main challenges in this field of research. APPROACH: This paper systematically investigates BCI performance under 6 types of distractions that mimic out-of-lab environments. MAIN RESULTS: We report results of 16 participants and show that the performance of the standard common spatial patterns (CSP) + regularized linear discriminant analysis classification pipeline drops significantly in this 'simulated' out-of-lab setting. We then investigate three methods for improving the performance: (1) artifact removal, (2) ensemble classification, and (3) a 2-step classification approach. While artifact removal does not enhance the BCI performance significantly, both ensemble classification and the 2-step classification combined with CSP significantly improve the performance compared to the standard procedure. SIGNIFICANCE: Systematically analyzing out-of-lab scenarios is crucial when bringing BCI into everyday life. Algorithms must be adapted to overcome nonstationary environments in order to tackle real-world challenges.


Subject(s)
Brain-Computer Interfaces , Imagination/physiology , Movement/physiology , Adult , Algorithms , Artifacts , Discriminant Analysis , Electroencephalography , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Female , Functional Laterality/physiology , Humans , Male , Psychomotor Performance , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
3.
J Neural Eng ; 11(3): 035013, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24836294

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: EEG artifacts of non-neural origin can be separated from neural signals by independent component analysis (ICA). It is unclear (1) how robustly recently proposed artifact classifiers transfer to novel users, novel paradigms or changed electrode setups, and (2) how artifact cleaning by a machine learning classifier impacts the performance of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). APPROACH: Addressing (1), the robustness of different strategies with respect to the transfer between paradigms and electrode setups of a recently proposed classifier is investigated on offline data from 35 users and 3 EEG paradigms, which contain 6303 expert-labeled components from two ICA and preprocessing variants. Addressing (2), the effect of artifact removal on single-trial BCI classification is estimated on BCI trials from 101 users and 3 paradigms. MAIN RESULTS: We show that (1) the proposed artifact classifier generalizes to completely different EEG paradigms. To obtain similar results under massively reduced electrode setups, a proposed novel strategy improves artifact classification. Addressing (2), ICA artifact cleaning has little influence on average BCI performance when analyzed by state-of-the-art BCI methods. When slow motor-related features are exploited, performance varies strongly between individuals, as artifacts may obstruct relevant neural activity or are inadvertently used for BCI control. SIGNIFICANCE: Robustness of the proposed strategies can be reproduced by EEG practitioners as the method is made available as an EEGLAB plug-in.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Artifacts , Brain Mapping/methods , Brain-Computer Interfaces , Brain/physiology , Electroencephalography/methods , Communication Aids for Disabled , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Humans , Principal Component Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , User-Computer Interface
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...